White Rose resistance Against Hitler Early stages

Members of white rose

Granite memorial

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Rose

These youth had tremendous courage and were heroes as was the Mormon youth I first posted about. All were beheaded literally. They distributed 6 leaflets calling for active opposition to the Nazi regime.They were influenced by the German Youth movement. They were from the University of Munich and advocated non violent resistance. Further posts will follow.

• Christoph Probst was a member. Hans Scholl was a member of the Hitler Youth until 1937, and Sophie was a member of the Bund Deutscher Mädel. Membership of both groups was compulsory for young Germans, although many such as Willi Graf, Otl Aicher, and Heinz Brenner never joined. QUOTED FROM BELOW
  
  

This article is about the German resistance movement. For other uses, see White Rose
(disambiguation).
Also see Weiße Rose
(opera) and Sophie
Scholl – Die letzten Tage

Monument to the "Weiße Rose" in front of the Ludwig
Maximilian University of Munich
The White Rose (German: die Weiße Rose)
was a non-violent resistance group in Nazi
Germany, consisting of a number of students from the University
of Munich and their philosophy professor. The group became known for an
anonymous leaflet campaign, lasting from June 1942 until February 1943, that
called for active opposition to German dictator Adolf Hitler's
regime.
The six core members of the group were arrested by the Gestapo and executed by beheading in 1943. The text of
their sixth leaflet was smuggled out of Germany through Scandinavia to the UK,
and in July 1943 copies of it were dropped over Germany by Allied planes,
retitled "The Manifesto of the Students of Munich."[1]
Today, the
members of the White Rose are honoured in Germany as amongst its greatest
heroes, since they opposed the Third Reich in the face of almost certain
death.

Between June 1942 and February 1943, they prepared and distributed six
leaflets, in which they called for the active opposition of the German people to
Nazi oppression and tyranny. Huber wrote the final leaflet. A draft of a seventh
leaflet, designed by Christoph Probst, was found in the possession of Hans
Scholl at the time of his arrest by the Gestapo. While Sophie Scholl hid
incriminating evidence on her person before being taken into custody, Hans did
not do the same with Probst's leaflet draft or cigarette coupons given him by
Geyer, an act that cost Christoph his life and nearly undid Geyer.
The White
Rose was influenced by the German Youth
Movement, of which Christoph Probst was a member. Hans Scholl was a member
of the Hitler Youth until 1937,
and Sophie was a member of the Bund Deutscher
Mädel. Membership of both groups was compulsory for young Germans, although
many such as Willi Graf, Otl Aicher, and Heinz
Brenner never joined. The ideas of Deutsche
Jungenschaft vom 1.11.1929 (dj 1.11.) had strong influence on Hans Scholl
and his colleagues. d.j.1.11 was a youth group of the German Youth Movement,
founded by Eberhard Koebel in 1929.
Willi Graf was a member of Neudeutschland,
a Catholic
youth association, and the Grauer
Orden.

The core of the White Rose comprised students from the university in
Munich—Sophie Scholl, her brother Hans
Scholl, Alex Schmorell, Willi
Graf, Christoph Probst, Traute
Lafrenz, Katharina
Schueddekopf, Lieselotte
(Lilo) Berndl, and Falk
Harnack. Most were in their early twenties. A professor of philosophy
and musicology, Kurt
Huber, also associated with their cause. Additionally, Wilhelm
Geyer, Manfred
Eickemeyer, Josef
Soehngen, and Harald
Dohrn participated in their debates. Geyer taught Alexander Schmorell how to
make the tin templates used in the graffiti campaign. Eugen
Grimminger of Stuttgart funded their
operations. Grimminger's secretary Tilly
Hahn contributed her own funds to the cause, and acted as go-between between
Grimminger and the group in Munich. She frequently carried supplies such as
envelopes, paper, and an additional duplicating machine from Stuttgart to
Munich.
The White Rose was influenced by the German Youth Movement, of which Christoph Probst was a member. Hans Scholl was a member of the Hitler Youth until 1937, and Sophie was a member of the Bund Deutscher Mädel. Membership of both groups was compulsory for young Germans, although many such as Willi Graf, Otl Aicher, and Heinz Brenner never joined. The ideas of Deutsche Jungenschaft vom 1.11.1929 (dj 1.11.) had strong influence on Hans Scholl and his colleagues. d.j.1.11 was a youth group of the German Youth Movement, founded by Eberhard Koebel in 1929. Willi Graf was a member of Neudeutschland, a Catholic youth association, and the Grauer Orden.
The group was motivated by ethical and moral considerations. They came from various religious backgrounds. Willi and Katharina were devout Catholics. The Scholls, Lilo, and Falk were just as devoutly Lutheran. Traute adhered to the concepts of anthroposophy, while Eugen Grimminger considered himself Buddhist. Christoph Probst was baptized a Catholic shortly before his execution. Earlier he had followed his father's theistic beliefs.
Some had witnessed atrocities of the war on the battlefield and against the civilian population in the East. Willi Graf saw the Warsaw and Lodz Ghettos, and could not get the images of brutality out of his mind. By February 1943, the young friends sensed the reversal of fortune that the Wehrmacht suffered at Stalingrad would eventually lead to Germany's defeat. They rejected fascism and militarism and believed in a federated Europe that adhered to principles of tolerance and justice.

Another cause of WWII Japanese invasion of Manchuria

http://www.5min.com/Video/Japanese-Invasion-of-Manchuria-1354515 VIDEO

The entrance of the Japanese to Mukden

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Japanese_invasion_of_Manchuria#Resistance_to_the_Japanese_invasion

http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/manchuria_1931.htm

This scenario presented a familiar pattern to the world. Western weakness and ineffective sanctions and moral protests with a powerless League of nations to prevent the invasion whereby the Japanese civilian government could no longer control her own military and their aggression. The same old argument of the hunger for resources which Manchuria afforded and the need for more space to relocate her overflowing population (Lebensraum) were the same arguments Germany used to justify her aggression and "secret " rearmament of the Ruhr. Japan andf Germany regarded ceratin races as inferior,also. The west as usual lost mopral nerve and equivocated with their pious morality only in talk, and the weak League could not enforce it sanctions. This scenario would be repeated ad nauseum in giving Hitler the green light to puverlize Europe.

Manchuria, on China’s eastern seaboard, was attacked by Japan in 1931. The League
effectively did nothing.
What was the background behind this attack and the League’s
response ?
Just one week before Japan invaded Manchuria, Viscount Cecil,
Britain’s chief representative at the League of
Nations, said in a speech to the League :
"I do not think there is the
slightest prospect of any war."
Japan, the League’s
strongest member in the Far East, proved him wrong.
Why did Japan
invade Manchuria ?
Japan was becoming increasingly crowded due to its
limited size as a nation and its rapidly increasing population. Manchuria
offered nearly 200,000 square kilometres which, as part of a Japanese empire,
would easily accommodate any over-spilling population. The Japanese people had a
very low opinion of the Chinese - a Japanese form of "untermenschen" - and,
therefore, would have given no thought to the Manchurian people whatsoever. It
was also believed in Japan that Manchuria was rich in minerals, forestry and
rich agricultural land. With the problems that Japan was experiencing at home,
Manchuria seemed an obvious solution to these problems.
By 1931, Japan had
invested vast sums of money into the economy of Manchuria effectively controlled
by the South Manchuria Railway Company. To guard all of its investments, Japan
kept a large army in southern Manchuria.
The 1929 Depression hit Japan hard.
The civilian government found that it had no solutions to the problems presented
by the world-wide depression and to the army the civilian government looked
weak. Many people admired the more robust response of the army. The unemployed
of Japan looked to the strength of the army to assist their plight rather than
to what weak politicians were doing. The voices of senior army generals were
heard and they argued for a campaign to win new colonies abroad so that the
industries there could be exploited for Japan. The most obvious target was a
full-scale invasion of Manchuria.
An explosion on a section of the South
Manchuria Railway, gave the army the excuse it needed to blame the local
population of sabotage and to occupy the nearest Manchurian town of Shenyang.
The League at
China’s request immediately ordered the Japanese army to withdraw. Japan’s
delegates at the League’s
headquarters in Geneva, agreed to this demand and blamed the event on army
"hot-heads".
The Japanese government in Tokyo also agreed to this
demand. However, the army did not listen and it launched a full-scale invasion
of Manchuria and by the end of 1931, it had occupied the whole of the province.
The civilian government had clearly lost control of the army, and the League’s
position was that it would deal with the government of the aggressor nation. But
how could this succeed when the government had no control over the army which
was the cause of the problem ?
The League could
introduce three sanctions. Verbal warnings clearly did not work. However, the
impact of the Depression meant that those nations that traded with Japan did not
want to risk losing this trade. If a nation did give up trading with Japan, as
Britain pointed out, their place would quickly be taken by another country
willing to get trade started with the Far East’s most powerful
nation.
Britain was also concerned about her colonies in the Far East,
particularly Hong Kong and Singapore. Would Japan attack them if Britain sided
with those who wanted to carry out economic sanctions on Japan ?
How did the League
deal with this problem of aggression ?
It established a Commission of Enquiry
lead by Lord Lytton of Great Britain. This Commission, after a lengthy visit to
the Far East including Manchuria, reported in October 1932. Lytton concluded
that Japan should leave Manchuria but that Manchuria itself should be run as a
semi-independent country instead of returning to Chinese rule. The report was
accepted and approved by the League in
1933. In response to the report and the League
accepting it, Japan resigned from the League and
occupied a region around Manchuria called Jehol, which it claimed gave the
Japanese army the ability to defend Manchuria.
What did this affair prove
?The League could
not enforce its authority. A major power could get away with using force An
issue so far from Europe was not likely to attract the whole-hearted support of
the major European powers in the League - Britain and France. The affair had
indicated that Britain was more concerned with her territories in the Far East
than in the maintenance of law and order. Other powers would almost certainly
see this episode as a sign that they too could get away with the use of force
The League also
lost its most powerful member in the Far East and ultimately Japan was to unite
with the two other nations that broke League rules - Germany and Italy.

Chambers of the Deep Project continued

http://www.galactic.to/rune/pyrmyst.html

The unknown secret entrance was found in 36 and entered 40 years later in 76.They are enormous underground recesses under Giza and documented by 1000's of microfilms. Are these films available for perusal? Are they kept secret and only now are "leaking" out by bits? These films prove ET visitations. I do believe the powers that be would "do all" to stop or hide these findings, for they are stakeholders of the status quo. Maybe it was intended that these discoveries not be brought to light at this time.ET visitations have been numerous yet unreleased (link the disclosure project ) which will come in later posts.Churches and western religions are expected to oppose widespread knowledge of these. More on this topic and on the rest of the article read as on above link.What is this spiritual controlplane alluded to?

MYSTERIES OF THE PYRAMID
Of David H. Lewis - from New Jersey, USA, who has
spent countless years studying ancient transcripts, hieroglyphics,
etc
Preface: the author here claims that a unknown, secret entrance to the
great pyramid was at last found on the basis of instructions and "intricate
codes" - found in a type of underearth tomb in 1936. These code-findings were
east of Athena but the "statements" was not correct decoded until many years
later he claims. Yes - it was not before june-76 that a small group was able to
enter these enormous underground chambers lying deep under the pyramids on Giza.
They claim to have taken thousands of microfilms of what they found - things
that proves far distant ET-visitations, underground civilizations and far
developed societies on earth. It may seem as a fantastic claim or a big bluff -
but remember that if this should be true - the conservative scientific society
and the might-powers in position - would do all to hide or stop these things.
This is not groundless claims - because the now released reports from "the disclosure project" - shows
very clear what the men in power has so well covered and denied ET-visitations
and similar the last 60 years or more. Another might that try to prevent these
discoveries to come forth, is the mighty churches and the western religions -
and the author was also strong influenced of this - as most of the Americans
seems to be in many ways. He was a son of a priest (Rev..) Their might would
weaken a lot - if proven discoveries would show that "god" did not make/create
earth - and human as said literally in the bible, some few millenniums
ago. Another thing to remark as some spiritual sources says - is that so-called
evidence - that is too convincing - is not allowed to come forth from the
spiritual "controlplane" - BECAUSE EVIDENCE IS SOMETHING THE RIPE SEEKER MUST
AND WILL RECOGNIZE INSIDE HIM/HERSELF. Therefore it may be so that it was
not yet intended that this things should come forth - until time was right.