http://meekscutoff.com/film/
The year is 1845, the earliest days of the Oregon Trail, and a wagon team of three families has hired the mountain man Stephen Meek to guide them over the Cascade Mountains. Claiming to know a short cut, Meek leads the group on an unmarked path across the high plain desert, only to become lost in the dry rock and sage. Over the coming days, the emigrants must face the scourges of hunger, thirst and their own lack of faith in each other’s instincts for survival. When a Native American wanderer crosses their path, the emigrants are torn between their trust in a guide who has proven himself unreliable and a man who has always been seen as the natural enemy.
Michelle Williams is “Emily Tetherow”
MEEK’S CUTOFF is Michelle Williams’ second collaboration with Kelly Reichardt. Her moving and evocative performance as “Wendy” in Reichardt’s critically acclaimed film WENDY AND LUCY garnered her a Toronto Film Critics Award for Best Actress in 2009 and her third Independent Spirit Award Nomination.
Williams’ riveting performance in Ang Lee’s BROKEBACK MOUNTAIN earned her a Broadcast Film Critics Association Award as well as Best Supporting Actress nominations from SAG, Golden Globe, BAFTA and ultimately an Academy Award nomination.
In 2004, Williams shared a Screen Actors Guild Award nomination with her fellow actors from Thomas McCarthy’s THE STATION AGENT for Outstanding Performance by a Cast in a Motion Picture. In 2005, Williams was honored by the Motion Picture Club as Female Star of Tomorrow. Williams was nominated for a 2007 Independent Spirit Award for Best Actress for her performance in Wim Wenders’ LAND OF PLENTY.
She will next be seen in Derek Cianfrance’s BLUE VALENTINE opposite Ryan Gosling. The film premiered at the 2010 Sundance Film Festival and also screened at the 2010 Cannes Film Festival. It will be released by The Weinstein Company on December 31, 2010. Williams is currently in production in Sarah Polley’s TAKE THIS WALTZ starring opposite Seth Rogen and she begins production on MY WEEK WITH MARILYN in the fall.
Williams’ other film credits include Sharon Maguire’s INCENDIARY, Charlie Kaufman’s SYNECDOCHE, NEW YORK, Todd Haynes’ I’M NOT THERE, Dan Harris’ IMAGINARY HEROES, Richard Ledes’ A HOLE IN ONE, Ethan Hawke’s THE HOTTEST STATE, Julian Goldberger’s THE HAWK IS DYING, Sandra Goldbacher’s ME WITHOUT YOU and Andrew Fleming’s DICK. Williams was last seen in Martin Scorsese’s SHUTTER ISLAND, opposite Leonardo DiCaprio.
On television, Williams starred opposite Chloë Sevigny in Martha Coolidge’s critically acclaimed HBO movie IF THESE WALLS COULD TALK 2. She also had a six-year run as “Jen Lindley” on the WB’s hit television series DAWSON’S CREEK. The series premiered in 1998 and remained one of the WB’s top-rated shows throughout its run.
On stage, Williams received glowing reviews for her portrayal of Varya in Chekhov’s THE CHERRY ORCHARD at the Williamstown Theatre Festival. She also achieved critical acclaim for her run in Mike Leigh’s SMELLING A RAT at the Samuel Beckett Theatre and her off-Broadway debut in KILLER JOE.
Kelly Reichardt – Director and Editor
American landscapes, and narratives of the road are themes that run throughout Kelly Reichardt’s work. MEEK’S CUTOFF, shot on the dry plains of Oregon’s high desert, offers a vision of the earliest days of American frontier culture. WENDY AND LUCY, filmed along the railroad tracks that surround an Oregon suburb, reveals the limits and depths of people’s duty to each other in tough times. Reichardt’s film OLD JOY is an exploration of contemporary liberal masculinity, set in the tamed wilderness of the Pacific Northwest. ODE, a super-8 retelling of the Legend of Billy Joe McAllister, is set around the creeks and underpasses of the rural south. Her first feature, RIVER OF GRASS, was shot in her hometown of Dade County, Florida. Sun-drenched highways, bus stations and dilapidated motels were the denatured setting for this lovers-on-the-run story. Reichardt is the recipient of a John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation Fellowship and teaches at Bard College.
Anish Savjani – Producer
In November 2005, Anish Savjani formed filmscience, an independent film production company. Since its inception, filmscience has produced ten feature films: Kelly Reichardt’s MEEK’S CUTOFF, WENDY AND LUCY and OLD JOY; Joe Swanberg’s ALEXANDER THE LAST, NIGHTS AND WEEKENDS and HANNAH TAKES THE STAIRS; Geoff Marslett’s MARS; Bob Byington’s HARMONY AND ME; Spencer Parsons’ I’LL COME RUNNING; and Steve Collins’ GRETCHEN. These films have been nominated by Film Independent for three Spirit Awards. filmscience currently has a number of projects by emerging and established independent filmmakers in production and development, including a new documentary from Michael Palmieri and Donal Mosher.
“Reichardt crafts a highly textured narrative that both invokes the mythology of the American frontier and cleverly transcends it.”
- Eric Kohn, Indiewire
“Kelly Reichardt’s most powerful film yet. She immerses us in a mesmerizing world.”
- Christy Lemire, Associated Press
http://www.amazon.com/Meeks-Cutoff-Michelle-Williams/dp/B0057IAPBO
Avant-Garde Western That's Actually Really Good November 20, 2011
By Jessica Winney
Format:DVDThis is a really interesting film. I'm glad that I read about it before I watched it so that I would know what to expect. If you do that, you will probably have a more enjoyable experience because you will be expecting it to be weird. While I agree that the film was slow and that the dialogue was difficult to hear (I, too, had to turn on the subtitles to understand what was being said), there are some really cool things about this film that I really liked. This is probably one of the most realistic films I have ever seen in terms of reflecting what life was really like for settlers during the time period depicted.I loved the beauty and sparseness of the scenery and I thought that the long periods of silence actually helped allow the viewer to experience the visual aspect of the film without having to constantly listen to people talk. I liked the conversations in complete darkness, I thought they were a really neat touch that added to the realism. Without the use of electric lights, complete darkness is what the characters would have experienced in real life and I like the way that was brought to the screen. It cut through the artificiality typically present in film by not making special allowances for the film viewers, like having lighting when it would normally be pitch black.
In addition, the justification for the full frame aspect ratio is one of the most creative that I have ever heard. I read somewhere, either in an interview or perhaps in the notes written on the DVD packaging, that Kelly Reichardt purposely did not use a widescreen format because she was trying to replicate for the viewer the vision restrictions imposed on the female characters in the film by the bonnets they had to wear. The bonnets restrict the wearer's vision from side to side and create a more box-like picture, so the full frame ratio is supposed to, literally, give the viewer the impression that they are seeing the world while wearing one of those bonnets. I also loved the ending, I love how it just ended abruptly and left the story completely unresolved. We never find out if the characters ever find water or if their Indian guide really knows where he is going or whether he is just as lost as they are. I love the final shot of Michelle Williams' face looking through the tree branches as she watches the Indian guide walk off into the distance, seemingly propelled by some otherworldly quality of which the other characters are ignorant. The culture/language clash between the white settlers and the Indian guide is also very well depicted - the Indian guide does not speak English and does not appear to make very many attempts to purposefully communicate with the settlers. He seems more interested in his own internal world than with anything the settlers are doing. Is he crazy and/or lost or is his unusual behavior only able to be understood in the context of his Native American culture, a culture of which the settlers and likely many viewers are largely ignorant? Interesting question to ponder.
This film is definitely not your conventional western nor conventional example of any other genre, for that matter. "Avant-garde" is pretty much the word here. If you can forgive some of its flaws and embrace the full-on realism and accuracy that the director appears to be going for, you might just enjoy this film. It starts out as a mystery, it remains a mystery throughout, and it ends as a mystery. Definitely one to leave you thinking for a long time afterward.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meek_Cutoff
HistoryIn 1845 there were rumors circulating among the emigrants on the Oregon Trail that the Walla Walla and Cayuse Indians might possibly attack the settlers in the Blue Mountains of Oregon or along the Columbia River. Reports of threats came in conjunction with the murder of two Frenchmen in the area.[1] Stephen Meek, the older brother of Joe Meek, was an experienced fur trapper and explorer who made his living as a wagon train guide. Meek was unemployed at the time but was considered to be someone who was familiar with eastern Oregon. When he offered the emigrants an alternate route to avoid the Blue Mountains many decided to follow him.[2] Some 200 wagons and 1,000 people turned off the primary Oregon Trail at Vale and followed Meek into the Oregon desert where no wagons had traveled before
Blazing a new trail
Meek led the wagon train southwest through the Malheur Mountains. They followed the Malheur River for the first two days but were then forced into the hill country. As they progressed the road became stonier. It was so hard on the oxen that several died each day.[3]
Some of the emigrants were not doing well, especially those who were already sick when the train took the cutoff. Just west of Castle Rock and along the North Fork of the Malheur River, a young mother of two small children was losing the battle to stay alive. “Rowland Chambers’ wife Sarah, the Captain’s daughter, had contracted camp fever earlier in the journey and was now critical. Everything possible was done to ease her distress as she lay in the wagon hovering between life and death but alas, to no avail. Sarah breathed her last breath at this camp and was laid to rest beneath the sagebrush.”[4] The next day the grieving husband was left behind with a horse as the train continued to journey on. He went down to the river and found a native stone that he smoothed, then he carved this inscription: “Mrs. S Chambers, Sep 3rd 1845.” It remains one of the few Oregon Trail gravestones in existence.
In 1849, Betsy Bayley recalled this event in a letter written to her sister in Ohio:
We camped at a spring which we gave the name of “The Lost Hollow” because there was very little water there. We had men out in every direction in search of water. They traveled 40 or 50 miles in search of water but found none. You cannot imagine how we all felt. Go back, we could not and we knew not what was before us. Our provisions were failing us. There was sorrow and dismay depicted on every countenance. We were like mariners lost at sea and in this mountainous wilderness we had to remain for five days. At last we concluded to take a Northwesterly direction . . . . After we got in the right direction, people began to get sick.[10]
The search for water ended when Meek climbed Glass Butte and from there he could see Buck Creek 25 miles due north. The emigrants immediately left for Buck Creek but from this point on they were no longer following Meek.[11]
During this period of the journey - while emigrants were driving their livestock throughout the night to water – the John Herren family reportedly found some gold nuggets, which led to the legend of the Lost Blue Bucket Mine. The name came from the story later circulated by some of the emigrants. The Herrens reported that if they had remained at their campsite they could have filled a blue bucket with gold nuggets. This place has never been found, but if it exists it is thought by some to be between Wagontire Mountain and the south fork of the Crooked River.[12]
The train splitsWhen the train reached the springs at the south fork one group turned west while the other continued north. The larger group followed Samuel Parker up to Steen’s Ridge where wagon ruts can still be seen today. Their goal was to follow the Crooked River. The smaller group with Samuel Teatherow continued west along the north side of Hampton Butte and then followed Bear Creek. Meek traveled with this smaller company. With the help of a Native American who guided the group to water for a blanket, they reached the Deschutes River where Bend, Oregon is today, and then followed the Deschutes north. This group suffered more for lack of supplies, so they sent a relief party ahead to The Dalles. The relief party thought it would be a two day journey, but it took them ten days. When they arrived at The Dalles they were in a starving condition and so weak that some of the men needed help dismounting their horses.[13]
[edit] The train reunitesOn September 26, 1845, both groups arrived on the same day at Sagebrush Springs near present-day Gateway, Oregon. They had all traveled a long distance without water, and the whole train stopped to rest on the 27th. On that day Samuel Parker entered in his diary:
"May codent get to water and water was taken to them, 32 in number. Heare we beried 6 persons."
Parker later added these remarks:
"Tuck what is called Meeks cutoff - a bad cutoff for all that tuck it."[14]
Meek continued on ahead of the company, and when he reached Sherars Falls on the Deschutes River he was warned that a father who lost two sons along the trail intended to kill him, so with the help of Native Americans a rope was sent across the swift river, and both Meek and his wife were guided through the water with ropes tied around them. They hurried to the Mission at The Dalles where they convinced Black Harris, a mountain man, to return to the falls with a crew and equipment to help the emigrants cross. In this way Meek made his escape, and the crew sent to help the pioneers arrived in time to help the over 1,000 people cross with their wagons. The wagons were taken completely apart to facilitate the dangerous crossing. Some of the emigrants crossed from the low banks, using their wagon box as a boat and guided by ropes over the swift current. Others used a rope and pulley system above the high walls of the narrows about two miles downstream. It took nearly two weeks to cross everyone in the wagon train. The starving and exhausted emigrants finally reached The Dalles beginning around the 2nd week of October, having suffered 23 known deaths and probably many more.
It is estimated that another 25 of the exhausted emigrants died after reaching The Dalles.[15] The deaths and other circumstances created resentment towards Meek and led to the often used phrase “Meek deserted them in the desert.”[16] But Meek did stay with his emigrants throughout most of the journey.[17]
The Meek Cutoff is one of sixteen historic trails recognized by the State of Oregon.[18] The blazing of the Meek Cutoff led to later wagon roads and the settlement of the eastern and central regions of Oregon.[19]
References
1.^ Keith Clark and Lowell Tiller. Terrible Trail: The Meek Cutoff, 1845, (Bend, OR: Maverick Publications Inc., 1966), 14-19.
2.^ Clark and Tiller. Terrible Trail, p. xvii-xx, 8-12.
3.^ Clark and Tiller. Terrible Trail, p. 25-28.
4.^ Donna Wojcik Montgomery, The Brazen Overlanders of 1845. Bowie Maryland: Heritage Books, Inc., 1992 (Revised Edition), First publication was in 1976 by Donna Wojcik, p.255.
5.^ Robert G. Boyd, Wandering Wagons: Meek’s Lost Emigrants of 1845 (Bend, OR: The High Desert Museum), p. 37.
6.^ Montgomery, The Brazen Overlanders of 1845, p.260.
7.^ James Field Jr. Journal. 1845, “Crossing the Plains,” Willamette Farmer, Portland, Oregon, beginning with issue dated April 18, 1879, and ending with the issue dated August 1, 1879.
8.^ Clark and Tiller.Terrible Trail, p.48.
9.^ Field, Journal. “Crossing the Plains”
10.^ Betsy Bayley, Letter to Mrs. Lucy P. Griffith, 1849 (Portland, OR: MSS 1508, Oregon Historical Society).
11.^ Clark and Tiller. Terrible Trail, p. 54-55.
12.^ Clark and Tiller. Terrible Trail, p. 91-101.
13.^ Clark and Tiller. Terrible Trail, p. 62-89.
14.^ Samuel Parker, Diary, 1845 (Portland, OR: MSS 1508, Oregon Historical Society).
15.^ Clark and Tiller. Terrible Trail, p. 115-119.
16.^ Clark and Tiller. Terrible Trail, p. 138.
17.^ Clark and Tiller. Terrible Trail, p. 138-143.
18.^ ORS 358.057 http://www.leg.state.or.us/ors/358.html
19.^ "Oregon House Joint Memorial 6". 1995. http://www.leg.state.or.us/95reg/measures/hjm1.dir/hjm0006.en.html. Retrieved 2008-11-26.
___________________________________________________________________________________
http://www.oregonhistorictrailsfund.org/trails/showtrail.php?id=7
Significance
The Meek Cutoff is perhaps the most infamous of all Oregon Trail branches. Seeking a more direct middle route across OregonÕs High Desert and central Cascade Range, Stephen Meek, an experienced mountain man, led 200 wagons across the arid plains west of Vale, Oregon toward the eastern slopes of the Cascades. Unable to find water on its intended route west, the train turned north and, after a difficult search, found water at Buck Creek and the South Fork of the Crooked River. By the time MeekÕs wagon train arrived in The Dalles, at least 23 persons had died.
In later years, rumors of a gold discovery -- one bright aspect of the Meek debacle -- inspired many eager prospectors back onto MeekÕs trail. Although gold was never discovered along the Meek Cutoff, per se, hopeful emigrants pushed eastward into the Powder River and Baker Valleys where, in the 1860s, gold veins were indeed located. Establishing the mines and the community services necessary to support them were the first step toward permanent emigrant settlements in eastern Oregon.
Historical context
Tuck what is called Meek's Cutoff...a bad cutoff for all that tuck it. ...I will just say, pen and tong will both fall short when they gow to tell of the suffering the company went through
Samuel Parker, 1845
Stephen Hall Meek was born in Virginia in 1807 to James and Spicy Meek. While in his late teens, Meek's mother died and his father remarried quickly. Meek's new mother, a widow with children of her own, was happy to care for the Widower Meek's family, and in so doing, imposed a new rigor into daily life. High time, the teenage Stephen Meek thought, to branch into a new life and head west. By 1828, Meek joined the fur trade and, with William Sublette, ventured into the Rocky Mountains.
Over the next seventeen years, Meek followed wildlife trails, Indian trading trails, and Hudson's Bay Company trails over much of the west. He joined the great trappers rendezvous and wintered with the Flatheads and "Napercies." He traveled many of the West's significant rivers: the Platte, Salmon, Snake, American, Greybull, Yellowstone, Humboldt, the John Day, Malheur, Owyhee, Columbia, Klamath, and Shasta. He traveled in the company of the great mountain men and explorers of the American West including Jim Bridger, Captain Benjamin Bonneville, and the Hudson's Bay Company's Tom McKay.
In 1842, the fur trade was in its closing years, and Meek found himself in Independence, Missouri. Alone, and with no particular direction to follow, Meek joined an emigrant wagon train bound for the Oregon Country. Under his guidance, the few emigrants who crossed overland that year arrived at Willamette Falls early in October.
At Oregon City, Meek and several of his associates were employed by Dr. John McLoughlin surveying and selling lots along the Willamette and Clackamas rivers. Never one to settle for long, Meek was traveling again the following spring. Subsidized by McLoughlin and the Hudson's Bay Company, Meek and his friend, Loren W. Hastings, lead a party of fifty-three men, women, and children from the Willamette River to Sutter's Fort on the American River in California. Although a number of those who were California-bound turned back midway, Meek saw the remaining travelers to Sutter's Fort and then continued alone to Monterey. After a brief stay in Monterey, Meek continued north to Bodega Bay. There he boarded a ship with intentions to travel the world, but only got as far as New York, via Panama, before a change of heart took him home to Virginia.
By May, 1845, Meek was back in Independence, Missouri, where an unprecedented group of Americans was gathering together to travel to the Oregon Country. Stephen Meek's experience (and perhaps his low bid for services) inspired his companions to select him as guide for the train of nearly 500 wagons.
The Wagon Train of 1845
When the wagons rumbled west from Independence, Meek was accompanied by his new bride Elizabeth. Travel was tedious and difficult. At Fort Hall, promoters encouraged emigrants to travel south to California, taking advantage of Captain Sutter's offer of free land.
While Sutter's promoters encouraged the emigrants, others warned them of the potential of Indian attack along the main stem of the Oregon Trail and of the dangers of crossing the Blue Mountains. Elijah White, returning to Washington DC from the Willamette Valley encouraged the emigrants to try a "new" route. Several turned south toward California, the rest continued west to Oregon.
During this time [after crossing the Snake near Fort Boise] a man whose name was Steven Meeks came along with a company of [Parkers] for Oregon; he said he had traveled the country between his point and Oregon many times and was quite familiar with the route; and that he would pilot us a near way that would save us a number of days' travel, provided that we would pay him for this service five dollars for each wagon on out trail. We consulted with the Manager [Mr. Craigie] at Fort Boise, in relation to this and he informed us that Mr. Meeks had passed the Fort three times to his knowledge, and also that he knew that there was a pack trail, through the country that Mr. Meeks designed going, so the most of us decided to follow him; after going down the river for a few miles we turned up a creek, leaving the old road that was traveled by the trappers.
Samuel Hancock, emigrant of 1845
Nathaniel Olney, a merchant from The Dalles who originally traveled the Trail in 1843 and was among those gathered at Fort Hall, also tried to convince the emigrants of the dangers on the old road. Meek and Olney devised a plan that would save time and bypass the dangers ahead. By traveling directly west from the Oregon Trail's junction with the Malheur River, Meek, Olney and others were convinced that they could connect a route through central Oregon, over the Cascades and into the Willamette Valley. Meek made a rough map of the routes he had taken when he crossed over the Malheur, Owyhee, and the John Day Rivers in 1834 with Bonneville. It was enough to convince about 40% of the emigrants to break from the main wagon train.
While others continued on the main stem of the Oregon Trail, Meek -- with between 750 and 1000 emigrants, 200 or so wagons, and thousands of head of livestock -- set out across the Malheur River, convinced that this was indeed a safer and shorter route for all concerned.
September 3, 1845...At this place are two trails; the fork is in the bottom above the crossing of the creek, and there is a possibility of emigrants pursuing the wrong route. I do not deem it amiss to give some particulars in relation to this road. Mr. Meek, who had been previously engaged as our pilot, but had previously went in advance of the companies who had employed him, and who after reaching Fort Hall fitted up a party to pilot through to Oregon, informed the emigrants that he could, by taking up this stream to near its source, and then striking across the plains, so as to intersect the old road near to the mouth of Deschutes or Falls river, save about one hundred and fifty miles travel; also that he was perfectly familiar with the country through which the proposed route lay, as he had traveled it; that no difficulty or danger attended its travel. He succeeded in inducing about two hundred families to pursue this route; they accordingly directed their course to the left, up this creek, about ten days previous to our arrival at the forks.
Joel Palmer, 1845
Monday, May 7, 2012
obscuring and concealment of the divine light
http://sn111w.snt111.mail.live.com/default.aspx#!/mail/InboxLight.aspx?n=812862866!n=1672552535&fid=1&fav=1&mid=a9bac364-9803-11e1-a0e2-00215ad801da&fv=1
Lessons In Tanya Dedicate an email
Iyar 15, 5772 · May 7, 2012Today's Tanya Lesson
Likutei Amarim, middle of Chapter 48
Listen Online
MP3 Download
והנה, פרטיות הצמצומים איך ומה, אין כאן מקום ביאורם
Now, as for the intricate details of the “contractions”, how they achieve their effect and what they actually are, — this is not the place for their explanation.
אך דרך כלל הן הם בחינת הסתר והעלם המשכת האור והחיות
But in general they are something in the nature of an obscuring and concealment of the flow of light and vitality,
שלא יאיר ויומשך לתחתונים בבחינת גילוי, להתלבש ולהשפיע בהן ולהחיותם להיות יש מאין
so that [the light and vitality] should illumine and reach the lower creatures in a revealed manner, pervading them and acting in them and animating them in such a way that they exist ex nihilo
כי אם מעט מזעיר אור וחיות, בכדי שיהיו בבחינת גבול ותכלית
in only an extremely minute measure, so that they be in a state of finitude and limitation.
Were their life-force to be revealed within them they would be infinite. “Contraction” ensures that the light and vitality which is their life-force remains concealed from them; all that is revealed is but a minute degree of light and vitality.
שהיא הארה מועטת מאד, וממש כלא חשיבי לגבי בחינת הארה בלי גבול ותכלית, ואין ביניהם ערך ויחס כלל
This light and vitality that is revealed within them after the “contraction” constitutes an infinitesimal illumination, and is truly considered as naught when compared with the quality of the limitless and infinite illumination, and there is no reference or relationship between them,
I.e., they are not quantitatively different, not even immensely different in quantity, but of a wholly different and incomparable quality.
כנודע פירוש מלת ערך במספרים, שאחד במספר יש לו ערך לגבי מספר אלף אלפים, שהוא חלק אחד מני אלף אלפים
as the term “reference” is understood in number values, where the number one has a relevancy to the number one million, for it is a one-millionth part of it;
The sum of one million is merely the sum of one million ones; subtract but one and the million ceases to exist — a clear demonstration of the relation that subsists between one and a million.
אבל לגבי דבר שהוא בבחינת בלי גבול ומספר כלל, אין כנגדו שום ערך במספרים
but as regards a thing which transcends finitude and numeration, there is no number — however great — that can be relative to it,
שאפילו אלף אלפי אלפים ורבוא רבבות אינן אפילו כערך מספר אחד לגבי אלף אלפי אלפים ורבוא רבבות
for a billion and a trillion1 when compared to infinity do not even attain the relevancy of the value of one in comparison with a billion or a trillion,
אלא כלא ממש חשיבי
For the sum of one retains some degree of relevance even when compared to a trillion — it is, in fact, one trillionth of it — while even a sum as large a trillion has no relevance at all when compared to the realm of the infinite, but is veritably accounted as nothing.
וככה ממש היא בחינת ההארה מועטת זו, המתלבשת בעולמות עליונים ותחתונים, להשפיע בהם להחיותם
So, indeed, is the utterly insignificant quality of this minute illumination — after the “contraction” — which clothes itself in the higher and lower worlds in order to provide them with sustenance and life,
לגבי אור הגנוז ונעלם, שהוא בבחינת אין סוף
when compared with the quality of the hidden and concealed light that is of an infinite order,
ואינו מתלבש ומשפיע בעולמות בבחינת גילוי להחיותם, אלא מקיף עליהם מלמעלה, ונקרא סובב כל עלמין
and does not clothe itself or exercise its influence in the worlds in a revealed manner, providing them with life, but encompasses them from above — i.e., it exerts its influence while remaining on its own level — and is called sovev kol almin (lit., “encompassing all worlds”).
Unlike the light that pervades all worlds (memale kol almin), which permeates and vests itself within them (just as the soul vests itself in the body), the encompassing light remains aloof from the worlds.
ואין הפירוש סובב ומקיף מלמעלה בבחינת מקום, חס ושלום, כי לא שייך כלל בחינת מקום ברוחניות
The meaning of this is not that it encircles and encompasses from above spatially, G‑d forbid, for in spiritual matters the category of space is in no way applicable,
Physical objects are spatial; they may be said to be found in one place or the other. Spirituality, however, is non-spatial; the terms “encompassing” and “encircling” are never to be understood in their literal, physical sense,
אלא רוצה לומר: סובב ומקיף מלמעלה לענין בחינת גילוי השפעה
but the meaning is that it “encircles and encompasses from above” insofar as the revelation of this influence is concerned,
כי ההשפעה שהיא בבחינת גילוי בעולמות נקראת בשם הלבשה, שמתלבשת בעולמות, כי הם מלבישים ומשיגים ההשפעה שמקבלים
for influence which is in the category of “revelation” in the worlds is referred to as “investiture”, being “clothed” within the worlds, for the influence that they receive is clothed and comprehended by them, i.e., they are able to comprehend and internalize it,
מה שאין כן ההשפעה שאינה בבחינת גילוי אלא בהסתר והעלם, ואין העולמות משיגים אותה, אינה נקראת מתלבשת, אלא מקפת וסובבת
whereas the influence which does not come within the category of “revelation”, but remains obscured and concealed, and is not apprehended by the worlds, is not described as being “invested” in them but as “encircling and encompassing” [them].
הלכך, מאחר שהעולמות הם בבחינת גבול ותכלית, נמצא שאין השפעת אור אין סוף מתלבשת ומתגלה בהם בבחינת גילוי, רק מעט מזער הארה מועטת מצומצמת מאד מאד
Therefore, since the worlds belong in the order of the finite and limited, it follows that only an extremely minute and contracted reflection of the flow of the [infinite] light of the blessed Ein Sof clothes and manifests itself in them in a revealed form,
והיא רק כדי להחיותם בבחינת גבול ותכלית
and this, only to animate them in a finite and revealed state.
In order for creation to come about there must necessarily be at least some glimmer of G‑dly illumination, albeit in an extremely limited form, for this enables creation to be finite and bounded.
אבל עיקר האור בלי צמצום כל כך נקרא מקיף וסובב, מאחר שאין השפעתו מתגלית בתוכם, מאחר שהם בבחינת גבול ותכלית
But the principal light that is without contraction to such an extent is called makkif (“encircler”) and sovev (“encompasser”), since its influence is not revealed within [the worlds], inasmuch as they belong in the order of the finite and the limited.
FOOTNOTES
1. “Text of Nishmat; Sifrei, beginning of Parshat Vaetchanan.” (— Note of the Rebbe.)
It would seem that the Rebbe here explains why the Alter Rebbe specifically chose to mention these two numbers: they are cited in the prayer beginning “Nishmat...,” in accordance with the passage in Sifrei indicated above.
Lessons In Tanya Dedicate an email
Iyar 15, 5772 · May 7, 2012Today's Tanya Lesson
Likutei Amarim, middle of Chapter 48
Listen Online
MP3 Download
והנה, פרטיות הצמצומים איך ומה, אין כאן מקום ביאורם
Now, as for the intricate details of the “contractions”, how they achieve their effect and what they actually are, — this is not the place for their explanation.
אך דרך כלל הן הם בחינת הסתר והעלם המשכת האור והחיות
But in general they are something in the nature of an obscuring and concealment of the flow of light and vitality,
שלא יאיר ויומשך לתחתונים בבחינת גילוי, להתלבש ולהשפיע בהן ולהחיותם להיות יש מאין
so that [the light and vitality] should illumine and reach the lower creatures in a revealed manner, pervading them and acting in them and animating them in such a way that they exist ex nihilo
כי אם מעט מזעיר אור וחיות, בכדי שיהיו בבחינת גבול ותכלית
in only an extremely minute measure, so that they be in a state of finitude and limitation.
Were their life-force to be revealed within them they would be infinite. “Contraction” ensures that the light and vitality which is their life-force remains concealed from them; all that is revealed is but a minute degree of light and vitality.
שהיא הארה מועטת מאד, וממש כלא חשיבי לגבי בחינת הארה בלי גבול ותכלית, ואין ביניהם ערך ויחס כלל
This light and vitality that is revealed within them after the “contraction” constitutes an infinitesimal illumination, and is truly considered as naught when compared with the quality of the limitless and infinite illumination, and there is no reference or relationship between them,
I.e., they are not quantitatively different, not even immensely different in quantity, but of a wholly different and incomparable quality.
כנודע פירוש מלת ערך במספרים, שאחד במספר יש לו ערך לגבי מספר אלף אלפים, שהוא חלק אחד מני אלף אלפים
as the term “reference” is understood in number values, where the number one has a relevancy to the number one million, for it is a one-millionth part of it;
The sum of one million is merely the sum of one million ones; subtract but one and the million ceases to exist — a clear demonstration of the relation that subsists between one and a million.
אבל לגבי דבר שהוא בבחינת בלי גבול ומספר כלל, אין כנגדו שום ערך במספרים
but as regards a thing which transcends finitude and numeration, there is no number — however great — that can be relative to it,
שאפילו אלף אלפי אלפים ורבוא רבבות אינן אפילו כערך מספר אחד לגבי אלף אלפי אלפים ורבוא רבבות
for a billion and a trillion1 when compared to infinity do not even attain the relevancy of the value of one in comparison with a billion or a trillion,
אלא כלא ממש חשיבי
For the sum of one retains some degree of relevance even when compared to a trillion — it is, in fact, one trillionth of it — while even a sum as large a trillion has no relevance at all when compared to the realm of the infinite, but is veritably accounted as nothing.
וככה ממש היא בחינת ההארה מועטת זו, המתלבשת בעולמות עליונים ותחתונים, להשפיע בהם להחיותם
So, indeed, is the utterly insignificant quality of this minute illumination — after the “contraction” — which clothes itself in the higher and lower worlds in order to provide them with sustenance and life,
לגבי אור הגנוז ונעלם, שהוא בבחינת אין סוף
when compared with the quality of the hidden and concealed light that is of an infinite order,
ואינו מתלבש ומשפיע בעולמות בבחינת גילוי להחיותם, אלא מקיף עליהם מלמעלה, ונקרא סובב כל עלמין
and does not clothe itself or exercise its influence in the worlds in a revealed manner, providing them with life, but encompasses them from above — i.e., it exerts its influence while remaining on its own level — and is called sovev kol almin (lit., “encompassing all worlds”).
Unlike the light that pervades all worlds (memale kol almin), which permeates and vests itself within them (just as the soul vests itself in the body), the encompassing light remains aloof from the worlds.
ואין הפירוש סובב ומקיף מלמעלה בבחינת מקום, חס ושלום, כי לא שייך כלל בחינת מקום ברוחניות
The meaning of this is not that it encircles and encompasses from above spatially, G‑d forbid, for in spiritual matters the category of space is in no way applicable,
Physical objects are spatial; they may be said to be found in one place or the other. Spirituality, however, is non-spatial; the terms “encompassing” and “encircling” are never to be understood in their literal, physical sense,
אלא רוצה לומר: סובב ומקיף מלמעלה לענין בחינת גילוי השפעה
but the meaning is that it “encircles and encompasses from above” insofar as the revelation of this influence is concerned,
כי ההשפעה שהיא בבחינת גילוי בעולמות נקראת בשם הלבשה, שמתלבשת בעולמות, כי הם מלבישים ומשיגים ההשפעה שמקבלים
for influence which is in the category of “revelation” in the worlds is referred to as “investiture”, being “clothed” within the worlds, for the influence that they receive is clothed and comprehended by them, i.e., they are able to comprehend and internalize it,
מה שאין כן ההשפעה שאינה בבחינת גילוי אלא בהסתר והעלם, ואין העולמות משיגים אותה, אינה נקראת מתלבשת, אלא מקפת וסובבת
whereas the influence which does not come within the category of “revelation”, but remains obscured and concealed, and is not apprehended by the worlds, is not described as being “invested” in them but as “encircling and encompassing” [them].
הלכך, מאחר שהעולמות הם בבחינת גבול ותכלית, נמצא שאין השפעת אור אין סוף מתלבשת ומתגלה בהם בבחינת גילוי, רק מעט מזער הארה מועטת מצומצמת מאד מאד
Therefore, since the worlds belong in the order of the finite and limited, it follows that only an extremely minute and contracted reflection of the flow of the [infinite] light of the blessed Ein Sof clothes and manifests itself in them in a revealed form,
והיא רק כדי להחיותם בבחינת גבול ותכלית
and this, only to animate them in a finite and revealed state.
In order for creation to come about there must necessarily be at least some glimmer of G‑dly illumination, albeit in an extremely limited form, for this enables creation to be finite and bounded.
אבל עיקר האור בלי צמצום כל כך נקרא מקיף וסובב, מאחר שאין השפעתו מתגלית בתוכם, מאחר שהם בבחינת גבול ותכלית
But the principal light that is without contraction to such an extent is called makkif (“encircler”) and sovev (“encompasser”), since its influence is not revealed within [the worlds], inasmuch as they belong in the order of the finite and the limited.
FOOTNOTES
1. “Text of Nishmat; Sifrei, beginning of Parshat Vaetchanan.” (— Note of the Rebbe.)
It would seem that the Rebbe here explains why the Alter Rebbe specifically chose to mention these two numbers: they are cited in the prayer beginning “Nishmat...,” in accordance with the passage in Sifrei indicated above.
Sunday, May 6, 2012
THE IASI POGROM and yet more holocaust stories
http://www.aish.com/ho/p/The_Iasi_Pogrom.html
The Iasi Pogrom
My father was the chief rabbi where one of the most violent pogroms in Jewish history took place.
by Rabbi Dr. Eliyahu Safran
My late father (z”l) was a special man – scholarly, pious, wise. A man whose eyes spoke of understandings unfathomable to me when I was young and whose strength and full impressiveness only come into clearest focus as I myself have gotten older.
Parents are always something of a mystery to their children. Those parents who lived during the horrors of the Shoah often remained an ever deeper mystery to their children, as if the pain of that time rendered parts of them unreachable. It wasn’t until a few very short months before my father passed away that I began to truly unlock that awful past in his life.
As I was going through his briefcase where he kept his most important and closely-held papers, I found a document written in Romanian, a language that I knew to be part of my family history but which I could neither read nor understand.
I turned to my sister, Miriam, for help. Miriam, ten years my senior, had been born in Iasi. Romanian had been her first language.
When I handed the document to her, she studied it closely. Her expression began to change. Her hand began to tremble. She dropped the document to the floor as her face became a mask of grief and tears sprang to her eyes.
“Miriam, what is it?” I asked, troubled by her reaction.
Click here to receive Aish.com's free weekly email.
It was several minutes before she could speak. “Now I understand,” she whispered, bending down and picking up the document I had given her, “now I understand everything…”
“Everything?”
My sister had suffered throughout her life, tormented by unimaginable nightmares that robbed her of sleep and sanctuary. The document I had given her described her nightmares perfectly – skeletons tossed haphazardly to the side of the road, bodies hanging from lampposts, Jews driven to their knees, shamed in the public square.
My sister's “nightmare” had been real.The document recorded the testimony of a survivor of the Iasi pogrom.
It was not the fantasy of a nightmare she read in that document. It was cold, harsh truth.
Miriam had been just three years old when the pogrom occurred but the images that the witness documented had been seared into her young imagination, returning in nightmares to torment her anew throughout her life.
The “nightmare” had been real.
Iasi was not the first, nor the last, of the pogroms visited upon Jewish communities throughout Europe during those horrible years. But Iasi was the community where my father was the Chief Rabbi. Iasi was his community and the community which, after three days of horror during which he was shot in the leg, his leadership was called upon as never before.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Jews had been in Iasi for over 400 years in June of 1941. Established in the 16th century, the community was highly developed religiously and culturally, as comfortable with its Chassidism, and its Zionism, as it was with its Yiddish theater.
Between 1930 and 1940, the Jewish population grew from approximately 30,000 to over 50,000. On the one hand, it was a perfect, inviting Jewish community. However, on the other, Iasi was anything but inviting. It was well known for its virulent anti-Semitism. Romanian fascists and anti-Semitic students had visited pogroms on the Jewish community in the past, in 1899 and 1923.
The Romanian government never honored their obligation of the 1919 Versailles Conference to grant Jews citizenship.
Jews were never safe there. However, for all the pain and hardship that the community had endured, nothing prepared it for what was to come on June 28, 1941. It was then, as the Axis prepared for war against the Soviets, the horror began.
There had been rumors circulating for days, weeks, and months. False rumors promulgated by the authorities, lies that sought to deflect blame from the authorities and place it on the Jews for the difficulties of the war. Outlandish lies so preposterous as to be unimaginable. Lies built upon more lies. Lies that accused Jews of helping the Soviets in their bombardment of the city. Lies that were accepted and embraced in the non-Jewish community.
Christians protected themselves from the inevitable violence by displaying signs on their homes: “Here live Christians, NOT Jydani!”Like the electricity in a perfectly blue sky when a thunder storm approaches, there was no doubt what was coming. Christians protected themselves from the inevitable violence by displaying signs on their homes reading, “Here live Christians, NOT Jydani!”
It was coming. It seemed that all of Iasi held its breath, awaiting its arrival. And arrive it did. With a vengeance.
The facts:
A rocket was launched to signal the start. The rocket’s flare had not faded before death and destruction was visited upon every Jewish district in the city. The attacks had been timed to coincide with the movement of Romanian and German troops toward the Russian front.
“The Jews are firing on the Romanian Army!”
The troops, which had been moving silently forward, suddenly started firing at the houses from which they believed they were being attacked. Panic broke out.
A “thorough” investigation into the event was ordered into the shooting of the troops. Though not a single soldier was found to have been killed or wounded, throughout the night Jews were randomly arrested and taken to a number of collection centers, most to the Police Headquarters.
Throughout the night, Jews were dragged from their homes, from their beds, from their families, and brought to the courtyard of the Police Headquarters. By dawn on that Sabbath morning, more than two thousand Jews had been rounded up. By noon, the number was six thousand.
June 29, 1941. Duminica Aceia (That Sunday).
That Sunday. The bloodiest day in the history of the Jews of Romania. With the mass of Jews corralled into the courtyard of Police Headquarters, soldiers opened fire, killing several hundred even as other soldiers beat individual Jews to death.
Did the screams and wails of these defenseless victims bring about mercy in the hearts of these good Christian soldiers? No. Their hearts were deaf to the defenseless cries of the innocents.
The community had exploded in a vile expression of hatred and evil.Not just the soldiers. The community had exploded in a vile expression of hatred and evil. Even as the massacre was taking place at Police Headquarters, the pogrom raged like a wildfire throughout the city, striking terror in every Jewish home.
12,000 Jews were arrested and shot outside Police Headquarters. 4,300 more were stuffed into closed cargo vans and cattle cars on trains. 2,650 died of thirst or suffocation. There are those who might argue that those who perished were the “lucky” ones. The survivors suffered excessive physical and mental trauma that, as it did my parents and sister, would torment them throughout their lives.
So began the Romanian chapter of Hitler’s Final Solution.
I.C. Butnaru, in “The Silent Holocaust,” records that during a cabinet session on July 8, 1941, Antonescu proclaimed that his government’s policy regarding the Jews did not trouble him. “It makes no different to me that ‘we’ll go down in history as barbarians’. The Roman Empire performed a series of acts of barbarism according to our present standards, and nevertheless it was the most magnificent political establishment. There has not existed a more favorable moment in our history. If it is needed, shoot all of them with machineguns.”
The savagery was so brutal that even Hans Frank, the German governor general of Poland, seemed to view the Iasi massacre with some distaste. “Has anyone ever seen a massacre of Jews in the streets of a German town? We use the art of surgery, not of butchery!”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What does the spiritual leader of a community so horribly violated do? What does he say? What is the response to an attack so vicious that even a monster like Hans Frank refers to it as “butchery”?
Only the pure flame of God’s truth could burn true in the face of such horror.
Only God’s strength could remain unbowed.
They said that when my father spoke, taught and lectured, flames of fire spewed forth his energy and dynamism. Many who had heard my father teach told me, “Whether there were three students in class or five hundred in a lecture hall, when your father taught, it was the same revelation at Sinai, as if sitting at the feet of a prophet” – nurtured and developed in the fires of destruction that came upon his community.
My father, elected Chief Rabbi of Iasi at the young age of 27, had looked upon the fires of Hell burn his people.My father, elected Chief Rabbi of Iasi at the young age of 27, had looked upon the fires of Hell burn his people. How could he rehabilitate his own life, let alone the life of his community? How does the leader of a community see its own destruction wrought in such brutal, unspeakable ways and go on? How does he lead? How does he even dream of renewal…?
In his “Masa Hamavet”, Dr. Manfred Reifer writes about Iasi, “the community's leadership, headed by its president, Yosef Jakob, and Chief Rabbi, Dr. Joseph Safran, soon turned its focus to heal its community's wounds which was so severely hit with the slaughter of its sons. First and foremost was the need to establish social aid and support that would extend assistance to over twenty thousand widows and orphans. Even more difficult was the crisis of Jewish schooling.”
My father, in his three-volume work, "Studies in the History of Jewish Education," noted that with such fear and trembling surrounding the community, the leaders of the community nevertheless – with the last of their strength – turned from siege and suffocation to rays of redemption. The past was pain. The future, as difficult as it was to see, held hope.
“There was a need for great focus in the midst of orphaned solitude and overwhelming loneliness to think of revival ...There was a need for all in the community to erect a dam in front of the storm that engulfed our very existence. The saga of endless pain and suffering which equally devastated young and old - also manifested great spiritual strength and fortitude.
In Torah, there is rejuvenation and rebirth.“The inescapable question confronting us was: in these horrific circumstances, how will we maintain our ancient and sacred heritage, our Torah and its practice? And the answer: We will renew the flames of hope in our hearts and rejuvenate our faith, through education, teaching and learning in schools and renewed prayer.
“And so it came to pass. Jewish schools and synagogues in Iasi were reopened anew. With glances of strength and encouragement teachers and educators turned to their students, attempting to instill consolation within them and to pat them lovingly. An everlasting warm love trembles in my heart remembering those teachers and their students, during those terrible days, trying days for the collective and individual, alike.”
The lesson of Iasi? To continue to teach. To teach, to teach, to teach.
In Torah, there is rejuvenation and rebirth. In the soul of the Jew is great strength. My father was one of the very first scholars to research, study and publish about halachic issues and responsa during the Holocaust.
As my father wrote, “We remain faithful to our past and learn from it in order to sanctify the future. There remains an everlasting and immutable bond between past, present and future in understanding our people.”
This article originally appeared on Ou.org's Shabbat Shalom site
The Iasi Pogrom
My father was the chief rabbi where one of the most violent pogroms in Jewish history took place.
by Rabbi Dr. Eliyahu Safran
My late father (z”l) was a special man – scholarly, pious, wise. A man whose eyes spoke of understandings unfathomable to me when I was young and whose strength and full impressiveness only come into clearest focus as I myself have gotten older.
Parents are always something of a mystery to their children. Those parents who lived during the horrors of the Shoah often remained an ever deeper mystery to their children, as if the pain of that time rendered parts of them unreachable. It wasn’t until a few very short months before my father passed away that I began to truly unlock that awful past in his life.
As I was going through his briefcase where he kept his most important and closely-held papers, I found a document written in Romanian, a language that I knew to be part of my family history but which I could neither read nor understand.
I turned to my sister, Miriam, for help. Miriam, ten years my senior, had been born in Iasi. Romanian had been her first language.
When I handed the document to her, she studied it closely. Her expression began to change. Her hand began to tremble. She dropped the document to the floor as her face became a mask of grief and tears sprang to her eyes.
“Miriam, what is it?” I asked, troubled by her reaction.
Click here to receive Aish.com's free weekly email.
It was several minutes before she could speak. “Now I understand,” she whispered, bending down and picking up the document I had given her, “now I understand everything…”
“Everything?”
My sister had suffered throughout her life, tormented by unimaginable nightmares that robbed her of sleep and sanctuary. The document I had given her described her nightmares perfectly – skeletons tossed haphazardly to the side of the road, bodies hanging from lampposts, Jews driven to their knees, shamed in the public square.
My sister's “nightmare” had been real.The document recorded the testimony of a survivor of the Iasi pogrom.
It was not the fantasy of a nightmare she read in that document. It was cold, harsh truth.
Miriam had been just three years old when the pogrom occurred but the images that the witness documented had been seared into her young imagination, returning in nightmares to torment her anew throughout her life.
The “nightmare” had been real.
Iasi was not the first, nor the last, of the pogroms visited upon Jewish communities throughout Europe during those horrible years. But Iasi was the community where my father was the Chief Rabbi. Iasi was his community and the community which, after three days of horror during which he was shot in the leg, his leadership was called upon as never before.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Jews had been in Iasi for over 400 years in June of 1941. Established in the 16th century, the community was highly developed religiously and culturally, as comfortable with its Chassidism, and its Zionism, as it was with its Yiddish theater.
Between 1930 and 1940, the Jewish population grew from approximately 30,000 to over 50,000. On the one hand, it was a perfect, inviting Jewish community. However, on the other, Iasi was anything but inviting. It was well known for its virulent anti-Semitism. Romanian fascists and anti-Semitic students had visited pogroms on the Jewish community in the past, in 1899 and 1923.
The Romanian government never honored their obligation of the 1919 Versailles Conference to grant Jews citizenship.
Jews were never safe there. However, for all the pain and hardship that the community had endured, nothing prepared it for what was to come on June 28, 1941. It was then, as the Axis prepared for war against the Soviets, the horror began.
There had been rumors circulating for days, weeks, and months. False rumors promulgated by the authorities, lies that sought to deflect blame from the authorities and place it on the Jews for the difficulties of the war. Outlandish lies so preposterous as to be unimaginable. Lies built upon more lies. Lies that accused Jews of helping the Soviets in their bombardment of the city. Lies that were accepted and embraced in the non-Jewish community.
Christians protected themselves from the inevitable violence by displaying signs on their homes: “Here live Christians, NOT Jydani!”Like the electricity in a perfectly blue sky when a thunder storm approaches, there was no doubt what was coming. Christians protected themselves from the inevitable violence by displaying signs on their homes reading, “Here live Christians, NOT Jydani!”
It was coming. It seemed that all of Iasi held its breath, awaiting its arrival. And arrive it did. With a vengeance.
The facts:
A rocket was launched to signal the start. The rocket’s flare had not faded before death and destruction was visited upon every Jewish district in the city. The attacks had been timed to coincide with the movement of Romanian and German troops toward the Russian front.
“The Jews are firing on the Romanian Army!”
The troops, which had been moving silently forward, suddenly started firing at the houses from which they believed they were being attacked. Panic broke out.
A “thorough” investigation into the event was ordered into the shooting of the troops. Though not a single soldier was found to have been killed or wounded, throughout the night Jews were randomly arrested and taken to a number of collection centers, most to the Police Headquarters.
Throughout the night, Jews were dragged from their homes, from their beds, from their families, and brought to the courtyard of the Police Headquarters. By dawn on that Sabbath morning, more than two thousand Jews had been rounded up. By noon, the number was six thousand.
June 29, 1941. Duminica Aceia (That Sunday).
That Sunday. The bloodiest day in the history of the Jews of Romania. With the mass of Jews corralled into the courtyard of Police Headquarters, soldiers opened fire, killing several hundred even as other soldiers beat individual Jews to death.
Did the screams and wails of these defenseless victims bring about mercy in the hearts of these good Christian soldiers? No. Their hearts were deaf to the defenseless cries of the innocents.
The community had exploded in a vile expression of hatred and evil.Not just the soldiers. The community had exploded in a vile expression of hatred and evil. Even as the massacre was taking place at Police Headquarters, the pogrom raged like a wildfire throughout the city, striking terror in every Jewish home.
12,000 Jews were arrested and shot outside Police Headquarters. 4,300 more were stuffed into closed cargo vans and cattle cars on trains. 2,650 died of thirst or suffocation. There are those who might argue that those who perished were the “lucky” ones. The survivors suffered excessive physical and mental trauma that, as it did my parents and sister, would torment them throughout their lives.
So began the Romanian chapter of Hitler’s Final Solution.
I.C. Butnaru, in “The Silent Holocaust,” records that during a cabinet session on July 8, 1941, Antonescu proclaimed that his government’s policy regarding the Jews did not trouble him. “It makes no different to me that ‘we’ll go down in history as barbarians’. The Roman Empire performed a series of acts of barbarism according to our present standards, and nevertheless it was the most magnificent political establishment. There has not existed a more favorable moment in our history. If it is needed, shoot all of them with machineguns.”
The savagery was so brutal that even Hans Frank, the German governor general of Poland, seemed to view the Iasi massacre with some distaste. “Has anyone ever seen a massacre of Jews in the streets of a German town? We use the art of surgery, not of butchery!”
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What does the spiritual leader of a community so horribly violated do? What does he say? What is the response to an attack so vicious that even a monster like Hans Frank refers to it as “butchery”?
Only the pure flame of God’s truth could burn true in the face of such horror.
Only God’s strength could remain unbowed.
They said that when my father spoke, taught and lectured, flames of fire spewed forth his energy and dynamism. Many who had heard my father teach told me, “Whether there were three students in class or five hundred in a lecture hall, when your father taught, it was the same revelation at Sinai, as if sitting at the feet of a prophet” – nurtured and developed in the fires of destruction that came upon his community.
My father, elected Chief Rabbi of Iasi at the young age of 27, had looked upon the fires of Hell burn his people.My father, elected Chief Rabbi of Iasi at the young age of 27, had looked upon the fires of Hell burn his people. How could he rehabilitate his own life, let alone the life of his community? How does the leader of a community see its own destruction wrought in such brutal, unspeakable ways and go on? How does he lead? How does he even dream of renewal…?
In his “Masa Hamavet”, Dr. Manfred Reifer writes about Iasi, “the community's leadership, headed by its president, Yosef Jakob, and Chief Rabbi, Dr. Joseph Safran, soon turned its focus to heal its community's wounds which was so severely hit with the slaughter of its sons. First and foremost was the need to establish social aid and support that would extend assistance to over twenty thousand widows and orphans. Even more difficult was the crisis of Jewish schooling.”
My father, in his three-volume work, "Studies in the History of Jewish Education," noted that with such fear and trembling surrounding the community, the leaders of the community nevertheless – with the last of their strength – turned from siege and suffocation to rays of redemption. The past was pain. The future, as difficult as it was to see, held hope.
“There was a need for great focus in the midst of orphaned solitude and overwhelming loneliness to think of revival ...There was a need for all in the community to erect a dam in front of the storm that engulfed our very existence. The saga of endless pain and suffering which equally devastated young and old - also manifested great spiritual strength and fortitude.
In Torah, there is rejuvenation and rebirth.“The inescapable question confronting us was: in these horrific circumstances, how will we maintain our ancient and sacred heritage, our Torah and its practice? And the answer: We will renew the flames of hope in our hearts and rejuvenate our faith, through education, teaching and learning in schools and renewed prayer.
“And so it came to pass. Jewish schools and synagogues in Iasi were reopened anew. With glances of strength and encouragement teachers and educators turned to their students, attempting to instill consolation within them and to pat them lovingly. An everlasting warm love trembles in my heart remembering those teachers and their students, during those terrible days, trying days for the collective and individual, alike.”
The lesson of Iasi? To continue to teach. To teach, to teach, to teach.
In Torah, there is rejuvenation and rebirth. In the soul of the Jew is great strength. My father was one of the very first scholars to research, study and publish about halachic issues and responsa during the Holocaust.
As my father wrote, “We remain faithful to our past and learn from it in order to sanctify the future. There remains an everlasting and immutable bond between past, present and future in understanding our people.”
This article originally appeared on Ou.org's Shabbat Shalom site
_________________________________________________________________________
Further holocaust stories forthcoming
Saturday, May 5, 2012
Secret of the Incas
http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/Secret_of_the_Incas/70153771?trkid=496624
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_of_the_Incas
PlotAn Incan legend states that the Inca Empire was destroyed by the gods when a gold and jeweled starburst was stolen from the Temple of the Sun centuries ago, and that the ancient civilization will be reborn once the treasure is returned. Harry Steele (Charlton Heston), an American adventurer, is seeking the artifact, as is his nemesis Ed Morgan (Thomas Mitchell), along with Elena Antonescu (Nicole Maurey), an Iron Curtain refugee.
ProductionSecret of the Incas was filmed by Paramount Pictures on location in Peru at Cuzco and Machu Picchu, the first time that a major Hollywood studio filmed at this archeological site. Five hundred native Indians were used as extras in the film.[1] The film also featured the Peruvian singer Yma Sumac as Kori-Tica. The film caused a surge in tourism to Peru in 1954.
Influence on Raiders of the Lost Ark
Charlton Heston and Nicole MaureyThe film is often cited by film buffs as a direct inspiration for the Indiana Jones franchise of films, with many of the scenes in Secret of the Incas bearing a striking resemblance in tone and structure to scenes in Raiders of the Lost Ark. Throughout Secret of the Incas, the main character, Harry Steele, can be seen wearing the "Indiana Jones" outfit - brown leather jacket, fedora, tan pants, an over-the-shoulder bag, and revolver.[2] The character also sometimes wears a light beard, unusual for films of its time, and there is a tomb scene involving a revelatory shaft of light similar to the "Map Room" sequence in Raiders.
Raiders' costume designer Deborah Nadoolman Landis noted that the inspiration for Indiana's costume was Charlton Heston's Harry Steele in Secret of the Incas: "We did watch this film together as a crew several times, and I always thought it strange that the filmmakers did not credit it later as the inspiration for the series" and quipped that the film is "almost a shot for shot Raiders of the Lost Ark."[3]
Secret of the Incas
19541hr 41mNRYou rated this movie: 5 Rate 5 starsRate 4 starsRate 3 starsRate 2 starsRate 1 starNot InterestedClearSaving.....Edward's rating:
5 stars.Average of 18,796 ratings:
3.2 stars ..Rugged American adventurer Harry Steele (Charlton Heston), who works as a tour guide in Peru, possesses part of a map leading to an invaluable Inca artifact and is racing to locate it before it's found by archaeologist Stanley Moorehead (Robert Young) or con man Ed Morgan (Thomas Mitchell). Using an airplane stolen with the help of a Romanian refugee (Nicole Maurey), Harry continues his quest at the stunning and treacherous Machu Picchu.
Some say this movie was the inspiration for elements of the Indiana Jones movies, and you can see that in this highly entertaining Charlton Heston adventure. Heston is an American living in Peru who makes a living giving tours to American tourists while trying to uncover the secret location of the Sunburst - an enormous jewel encrusted gold object created by the Incans that has been lost for hundreds of years. He teams up with a pretty Romanian, steals a plane, outwits the evil Ed Morgan, and eventually does the right thing. One thing that makes this movie compelling is that it is shot on location in Peru. Its just a really fun movie to watch and until recently has been hard to find.
Gee, do you think George Lucas and Stevie Spielberg may have seen this movie when they were kids? Charlton Heston edges out even Harrison Ford in the "Indiana Jones" role. All that's lacking is the bullwhip. The villain is deliciously creepy, right through to his final death-scream (more like a hoar...read morese croak), and the subtle artistic touches - like the ever-present stain on his vest, are from an earlier age of movie-making. Yet, as repugnant and devoid of scruples as he is, the film-makers also manage to create some compassion for him in the end. Very well-paced movie from an earlier age when audiences were more patient, and allowed for some actual character and plot development before getting to the good stuff. And the good stuff is indeed very good - and worth the wait. Robert Young is also fun in the kindly doctor role, presaging his later stint as Marcus Welby, M.D. Find out where Raiders of the Lost Ark really came from.
http://www.t-g.com/blogs/brianmosely/entry/17975/
Charlton Heston as Harry Steele in the 1954 film "Secret of the Incas," who has more than a few things in common with a popular film icon that will be returning to a theater near you next month.The recent passing of film legend Charlton Heston has had many a movie enthusiast mourning this loss. From the parting of the Red Sea, to chariot races, to finding the ruins of the Statue of Liberty, Heston played a wide variety of classic cinematic roles.
Including Indiana Jones.
Wait. Harrison Ford is returning next month to the classic role, right? Well, yes he is, but way before that, before Heston told Yul Brenner to let his people go, there was the1954 Paramount film entitled "Secret of the Incas," which has more than a few similarities to "Raiders of the Lost Ark."
In fact, after watching the unknown film for the first time this weekend, I believe George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have a bit of explaining to do when it comes to fully attributing the inspiration of the Indiana Jones character.
The film stars Heston, who plays square-jawed Harry Steele, a womanizing con artist getting by as a tour guide in the historic areas of Peru, that is, when he's not treasure hunting. He's been looking for the legendary diamond encrusted, solid gold Sunburst hidden in the ruins of Machu Picchu for years, but has had no success, until events begin to go his way.
So why do I say that Spielberg and Lucas lifted the character from this forgotten low budget film and turned him into the daring archaeologist we all know?
Because Steele looks exactly like Indiana Jones. And I mean an absolute spitting image of the film icon.
In fact, according to Wikipedia, the costume designer for "Raiders" said that the inspiration for Jones was Harry Steele.
"We did watch this film together as a crew several times, and I always thought it strange that the filmmakers did not credit it later as the inspiration for the series."
So do I.
Not only that, he's the only one possessing the crucial piece needed to find the location of the priceless Inca Sunburst. And for a swindling ladies man, he certainly knows quite a bit about South American archeology. The similarities to Indiana Jones doesn't end there. To figure out the location of the sacred artifact, he uses the old reflecting light trick seen in "Raiders" when Indiana is looking for the Well of Lost Souls, to find the treasure.
The film was released by Paramount and I find it quite interesting that this movie isn't available from the studio that released the Indiana Jones series, or for that matter, through your regular on-line retail outlets like Amazon. Or anywhere else. In fact, the copy I just got, which is a fine print of this lost film, is an obviously homemade DVD, and it took a while for this film buff to track down.
If I were a raving conspiracy theorist, I'd suggest that Lucas and Spielberg had the studio bury this vintage film so that movie buffs would never know where they got the idea for the adventure-seeking archaeologist that made them millions.
But that's just silly. They wouldn't do that. It's just a bunch of coincidences, right? That would be like saying "Star Wars" and its style was really based on a samurai film from the 1950's. What was I thinking...
In any case, I'm looking forward to watching the latest Indiana Jones film in May. But, I'm going to be checking the credits for a special thanks to Charlton, too. I hope I see it.
Let's give credit where credit is due.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments
Showing comments in chronological order
[Show most recent comments first]
Amen.
We owe a lot to the old pulp characters.
Often,we create new riffs on ancient stories without realizing that the conventions and cliches we love were once original and fresh when introduced years ago.
If not for remakes,revivals and pastiches,a younger generation might never know of the plots,the characters or the people who brought them to life.
Frank Reade,Jack Armstrong,Johhny Brainerd,Bulldog Drummond and others of their eras gave birth to Tom Swift and Johnny Quest as surely as Horatio Hornblower begat James Tiberius Kirk and Modesty Blaise gave birth to Sidney Bristow.
Whether we enjoy Henry Jones' baby boy,that Bond fellow,Emma Peel,the Maverick Brothers or Jessica Fletcher,we need to thank Steele (and Heston),Miss Marple,Raffles,Honey West and all the others who started those genres.
-- Posted by quantumcat on Sun, Apr 27, 2008, at 6:06 PM
Charlton Heston was indeed the definitive Indiana Jones prototype in SECRET OF THE INCAS. I saw this wonderful adventure movie as a kid and it inspired me to travel to Peru last year to explore all the locations shown in the movie, like Machu Picchu and Cuzco. I had the greatest two weeks of my life in Peru ... thanks to SECRET OF THE INCAS. Charlton Heston was also amazingly similar to Indiana Jones in the terrific circus epic THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH, coincidently Spielberg's favourite movie as a child. I have devoted a site to SECRET OF THE INCAS, where you can compare Heston's Harry Steele to Spielberg's Indiana Jones.
http://incas.mysite.orange.co.uk
-- Posted by James Byrne on Tue, Apr 29, 2008, at 4:19 AM
I just watched Willow (another George Lucas movie) again for the first time since I was a kid, and it seemed to be a copy of the Hobbit series. I love all of the Lucas movies, but he is seeming to come across a little unoriginal.
-- Posted by greasemonkey on Wed, Apr 30, 2008, at 8:12 PM
The link to my site on SECRET OF THE INCAS has changed. You can now view my site on this great precursor to Indiana Jones at :
www.secretoftheincas.co.uk
-- Posted by James Byrne on Tue, Sep 9, 2008, at 4:54 AM
From Kirkus Reviews
http://www.amazon.com/The-Secret-Incas-Astronomy-Against/dp/0517888513
The Secret of the Incas: Myth, Astronomy, and the War Against Time [Paperback]
William Sullivan
A sometimes murky, frequently meandering excursion into the meaning of ancient Andean beliefs, arguing that in a series of sophisticated myths Incan soothsayers foretold their own civilization's doom at the hands of Pizarro and his conquistadors in 1532. Sullivan, a scholar of Native American cultures, begins with a question that has perplexed historians of the Spanish conquest: How could the vast Inca Empire, with its millions of subjects, have been conquered overnight by a band of 170 Spanish adventurers? Sullivan digs into the history and mythology of Andean civilization to find what he feels is the answer: For hundreds of years the sages of the Andes had believed that astronomical transitions presaged earthly cataclysms; reading changes in the night skies in the 1400s, Incan priest-astronomers foretold the imminent destruction of their own recently founded empire. Sullivan argues, in a sometimes hyperbolic first-person account (``In that moment I had, I believed, touched for an instant the terrible burden and tragic urgency of the Inca vision''), that the Incas followed the planets, recorded precessional events in their myths, and equated social and celestial changes. He further asserts that elements in Incan culture preceding Pizarro's arrival--constant warfare and the Incan ritual of human sacrifice--represented an attempt to halt the march of time and prevent the apocalyptic events foreshadowed by changes in the night sky. The Incas assumed that the arrival of Pizarro represented the culmination of the prophecy and the failure of their own efforts to prevent its occurrence. The thread of the author's argument can be hard to follow. Still, Sullivan's deep feeling for Andean folk materials, and the originality of his observations about Andean astronomy, make his text worthwhile for those interested in the history of South American civilization and for those who, in the wake of Joseph Campbell's works, seek enduring meaning in ancient mythology. (History Book Club and One Spirit Book Club alternate selections) -- Copyright ©1996, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
William Sullivan decodes the myths of the Incas.
Secrets of the Incas chronicles how Dr Sullivan first learned to decode ancient Andean myths. These myths - which were recorded by the Spanish at the time of their conquest of the Incas - are, according to Dr Sullivan, a 'message in a bottle' from the Incas to future generations. Dr Sullivan describes how he decoded the myths and how this led him to certain important dates in Andean prehistory and history. A glossary defines and explains various Andean mythological and historical terms, and a timeline shows what Dr Sullivan believes to be the correspondence between mythological, astronomical and archaeological events in the high Andes - how, in effect, what was happening in the heavens was mirrored by what was happening on Earth
On the evening of 15 November 1532, a band of 175 hardened Spanish adventurers crossed a pass in the high Andes. Looking down upon a broad, fertile valley in northern Peru, they became the first Europeans to make contact with the Incas, whose highly developed empire stretched 3,000 miles from Chile to Colombia and had a population of six million. On the following day, in what ranks as one of the strangest events in all recorded history, the Spaniards managed to seize the Inca king Atahuallpa and, in the ensuing panic, used the advantage of their 120 warhorses to kill and wound 10,000 Inca warriors. From that day onward, through luck and guile, and with reinforcements soon pouring in from Panama, the Spaniards - who came in search of gold and glory, in the name of the Roman Catholic Church - never relinquished the edge they seized in that first fateful encounter.
What the Spaniards never knew, and what history does not record, was the reason for the apparently inexplicable collapse of the greatest land empire on the face of the Earth
SECRET OF THE INCAS
Harry Steele is a tough young American soldier of fortune, eking out a living as a tour guide in Cuzco, Peru. He has heard the legend of the Inca treasure, a fabulous golden Sunburst which has been missing for centuries, and his intention, when he can get hold of a private plane, is to head for the long lost Inca city of Machu Picchu.
There is a legend among the Quechua Indians that the Inca Empire will be restored when the Sunburst is found. It is believed to be hidden in the tomb of Manco, last of the Inca chiefs. Harry has come into the possession of a fragment of an ancient stone map which points to the secret location of the treasure.
Steele is bored with his tour guide work and supplements his tedious job with a bit of gigolo work in his spare time. Bored tourists, like the middle-aged Mrs Winston, keep him busy with this extra occupation. Treacherous wheeler-dealer Ed Morgan occasionally does business with Harry, even though they mistrust and despise each other. Morgan knows that Harry has the stone map, and after being rebuked on a partnership deal, sends a sniper after Harry to ‘frighten’ him. Obviously shocked by the near miss from the gunman, Steele threatens the old guy and only calms down when he’s told that Morgan has lined up a little deal for him.
Morgan tells Harry that a Romanian refugee is coming to Cuzco by truck from La Paz and she needs help to get to Mexico. The Romanian Consul, Anton Marcu, has pursued her to Peru to take her back behind The Iron Curtain.
Harry meets the beautiful Elena in Cuzco Hotel, but when he finds out that she is short of cash, he isn’t interested in helping her escape. Only when Elena tells him that the Rumanian Consul has persued her to Peru in a private plane is Harry willing to help her. Having telephoned the consul giving him Elena’s whereabouts, Harry strikes a deal with Elena, knowing that she’s now helpless to refuse.
SECRET OF THE INCAS
Harry Steele is a tough young American soldier of fortune, eking out a living as a tour guide in Cuzco, Peru. He has heard the legend of the Inca treasure, a fabulous golden Sunburst which has been missing for centuries, and his intention, when he can get hold of a private plane, is to head for the long lost Inca city of Machu Picchu.
There is a legend among the Quechua Indians that the Inca Empire will be restored when the Sunburst is found. It is believed to be hidden in the tomb of Manco, last of the Inca chiefs. Harry has come into the possession of a fragment of an ancient stone map which points to the secret location of the treasure.
Steele is bored with his tour guide work and supplements his tedious job with a bit of gigolo work in his spare time. Bored tourists, like the middle-aged Mrs Winston, keep him busy with this extra occupation. Treacherous wheeler-dealer Ed Morgan occasionally does business with Harry, even though they mistrust and despise each other. Morgan knows that Harry has the stone map, and after being rebuked on a partnership deal, sends a sniper after Harry to ‘frighten’ him. Obviously shocked by the near miss from the gunman, Steele threatens the old guy and only calms down when he’s told that Morgan has lined up a little deal for him.
Morgan tells Harry that a Romanian refugee is coming to Cuzco by truck from La Paz and she needs help to get to Mexico. The Romanian Consul, Anton Marcu, has pursued her to Peru to take her back behind The Iron Curtain.
Harry meets the beautiful Elena in Cuzco Hotel, but when he finds out that she is short of cash, he isn’t interested in helping her escape. Only when Elena tells him that the Rumanian Consul has persued her to Peru in a private plane is Harry willing to help her. Having telephoned the consul giving him Elena’s whereabouts, Harry strikes a deal with Elena, knowing that she’s now helpless to refuse.
He asks her to steal the plane keys from Anton Marcu and they fly to the mystical village in the Andes, Machu Picchu. Having to land ten miles outside the Inca village, they set off on an arduous trek through the jungles of Peru. When they arrive at the ruins of Machu Picchu, they see that an archaeological expedition, headed by Dr Stanley Moorehead, is encamped on the spot. Pachacutec, the leader of the local Quechuan community, and his sister, Kori-Tica, both mistrust the pair, but the others in the expedition give them a warm welcome. Harry explains their presence by saying they were forced down when their plane ran out of gas.
In the evening while watching a sacred Inca ritual ceremony performed by Kori-Tica in the ruins, Dr Moorehead expresses his love for the beautiful refugee Elena. Ed Morgan arrives at the camp, and forces Steele to hand over the stone map, but is forced to go fifty-fifty with Harry because he doesn’t know how to read it. Dr Moorehead proposes marriage to Elena at the Intihuantana but she is more attracted to the rough, tough Harry Steele, but his lying, scheming nature prove to be a barrier.
The archaeological expedition mistakenly think they have finally discovered the long lost Sunburst, but it is only a stone replica. While Ed Morgan is asleep, Harry retrieves the stone map and enters the tomb discovering the real jewel encrusted golden Sunburst. Morgan follows him and shoots at Harry, making off with the Sunburst. The noise wakens the whole camp and they chase Morgan to the top of Machu Picchu.
Steele takes a short cut and is waiting for Morgan, after a brief scuffle Morgan falls to his death and Steele returns the Sunburst to the Quechuan community. He and Elena then head off to make a new life together
It’s true, if it wasn’t for SECRET OF THE INCAS, we wouldn’t have had the most exciting, extraordinary experience of our married life, a totally unique action-packed holiday that was worth all the worry and the planning, the expense, the yellow fever jabs, the anti-malaria tablets, the stomach upsets and the horrendous 15 hour flight (thank God for Bill Bryson). Peru is a land of intrigue, where tales of lost cities, fabulous treasures and sun-worshipping natives vanquished by ruthless conquistadors abound. This is a land of colourful people, exotic birds, great lakes and remote forests. As a kid, my imagination was stirred by watching Hollywood movies about American tough guys hunting for lost cities in the darkest jungles of South America, and SECRET OF THE INCAS was, without a shadow of a doubt, the best of these.
____________________________________________________________________
http://www.secretoftheincas.co.uk/page28.html
FRASER HESTON in conversation with JAMES BYRNE.
(6-12 May 2008)
JAMES BYRNE: I love a movie you wrote and produced, Mother Lode, in which your father also directed and starred in. The plot – about a group of adventurers searching for the Mother Lode in a secret cavern – has slight elements of the Secret of the Incas plot. My children pointed out to me that the beginning of Mother Lode, the tough guy hero in the aeroplane flying over the terrific scenery, resembled Harry Steele flying over the Andes. Fraser, did watching any of your father’s old adventure movies from the 1950’s influence you at all when writing Mother Lode?
FRASER HESTON: Thanks James, much appreciated. I’m sure there are some unintentional similarities – Mother Lode’s a treasure hunt film after all, but I made no conscious effort to emulate anything from Incas – more like a homage to another great treasure hunt film (the greatest ever): Treasure of the Sierra Madre.
JAMES BYRNE: I agree with you Fraser, Treasure of the SierraMadre is the greatest treasure hunt movie of ‘em all. Here’s an interesting little titbit I noticed when watching the Bogey classic. Fred C. Dobbs’ final words are “Burro, burro,” coincidently the first words spoken by Chuck Heston in Secret of the Incas, and the sunburst seekers in Incas are very similar to the Sierra Madre treasure hunters. Maybe the Incas scriptwriters were slightly influenced by the Bogey movie, who knows? As a scriptwriter, producer and director, Fraser, do you think it’s tempting to ‘pop in’ little homages to old classics as part of the plot of your own movie?
FRASER HESTON: I don’t think this happens as much as film critics allege – homages (or rip-offs as they are more often called) probably happen inadvertently as often as not, or subconsciously, thinking “Wouldn’t it be cool if this happened …” but forgetting you saw it in some other film first! Obviously there are exceptions, obvious homages and spoofs, but mostly we’re desperately working away, trying to come up with something original!
JAMES BYRNE: Most people who venture to Peru go on the ‘Inca Trail’, but I was slightly different, I went on the ‘Harry Steele Trail’, and made a point of touring all the locations seen in Secret of the Incas. Did you visit any of the places in Cuzco that Harry Steele hung out in the movie when you visited Peru, Fraser?
FRASER HESTON: Yes. I visited Cuzco, Sacsayhuaman, and Machu Picchu. I also travelled up the Amazon, by plane, river steamer (think Fitzcarraldo), motorized canoe and a dugout from Belem at the mouth up to Iquitos, and then eventually aways up the Ucayali, and then came to the Urubamba (below Machu Picchu) by train. Had a blast.
JAMES BYRNE: Sounds terrific Fraser. You also climbed Huayma Picchu at Machu Picchu, it sure looked a daunting prospect to me as I stood at the foot of it … was it as dangerous as it looked?
FRASER HESTON: I didn’t think it was all that dangerous, but there is certainly some exposure when you climb through a little cave, and pop out onto an airy little traverse overlooking the Urubamba valley about a thousand feet below. Nothing of any technical difficulty however and well worth the effort. I also got locked into the ruins after hours when I lost track of time in the fog. Security guard found me and turfed me out. Very cool experience.
JAMES BYRNE: Wow! The son of Harry Steele lost in the ruins of Machu Picchu! Fraser, your mother is an accomplished photographer and often went on location with her husband, and took some terrific shots. Has she ever considered writing a book … and using all those great behind-the-scenes location photos she took over the years?
FRASER HESTON: I have often been asked, “Your life was like Indiana Jones – one adventure after another – was it your father who inspired your adventures?” In fact, I say, it was my mother who was Indiana Jones, who dragged us up all those pyramids from Sacarra to Chichen Itza, ruin-running from Hadrian’s Wall to the Acropolis, museum marching from the British Museum to the Met. She’s published a couple of books, several photo shows and retrospectives, and is still going strong, at 84.
JAMES BYRNE: She’s a great lady, Fraser. For many years now, fans of Secret of the Incas have been literally begging for its release onto video and dvd. Have you any idea why Paramount won’t release this wonderful movie?
FRASER HESTON: I agree! I’m not sure Paramount is resisting releasing that, per se, but they’ve got a lot of old films (thousands in fact!) and I suppose eventually they’ll get around to releasing all of them. Let’s hope Incas is sooner than later!
JAMES BYRNE: I would like to congratulate you on your marvellous version of Treasure Island. It must have been a daunting prospect bringing a different variation on an oft-filmed classic. I notice that your adaptation is more realistic than the other movies, in particular the Disney version. Any thoughts on the making of this film?
FRASER HESTON: Thanks – another treasure hunt movie if there ever was one: and the best pirate story ever. And my favourite book – my dad read it to me dozens of times from the age of five! We tried to make this the most faithful to the book, and the most real, gritty version, with authentic sea faring stuff (we used the H.M.S. Bounty, provided by Ted Turner who got it from MGM) and pirates who would sooner cut your throat than look at you. Did we succeed?
JAMES BYRNE: Yes Fraser, you more than succeeded in making the pirates in Treasure Island look far more realistic than in the earlier versions. You got great performances from your father as Long John Silver and Oliver Reed as Billy Bones. In fact, all the cast really did look like gin-soaked nasty sea-dogs, particularly Reed and Pete Postlethwait. Ollie Reed had a bit of a reputation over here in England as being ‘very thirsty’. Did Ollie behave himself on the set … was he easy to work with?
FRASER HESTON: Thanks for the compliment. I loved directing Treasure Island with dad – a childhood fantasy come true. Oliver, in the event, though we were concerned at first, behaved himself very well, and delivered a stunning performance in my opinion. Though he could booze with the best of them, and eventually and tragically drank himself to death, as I understand it, he was professional with us at all times. We had a great cast in that film, including Christian Bale (who came all the way across America just to attend my father’s memorial) Christopher Lee, Julian Glover, Pete Postlethwait and of course Ollie, and not to mention Charlton Heston. It was a director’s dream come true and I was like a kid in the candy store with all those wonderful English actors. It’d be honoured to work with any of ‘em again in a heartbeat.
JAMES BYRNE: Yes, Treasure Island was a great movie, Fraser. What is your favourite Charlton Heston movie … and why?
FRASER HESTON: Two of them: Ben-Hur because it’s an amazing film, and stands up very well today. Just incredible. And Will Penny – a little western dad made up in the High Sierra, where I will spread some of his ashes in a few weeks, because it’s a hell of a movie and one of my dad’s personal favourites.
JAMES BYRNE: Fraser, you appeared as the infant Moses in The Ten Commandments, which is one of my family’s favourite movies. Obviously, you won’t be able to remember a single thing about making the movie, but did you ever meet any of the stars of the movie when you were older … and if so, what did they say to you?
FRASER HESTON: I’m sure I must have met Yul Brynner when I was very young, but don’t recall what he said. I did meet Cecil B. De Mille later (I’m the youngest actor in his last film as a director, and therefore, I am probably the last actor to ever work with C. B. DeMille). Here’s a photo for you – the inscription reads:
“To a fine young actor in a gripping situation. From his director, - C. B. DeMille. All three of us made the Ten Commandments.”
JAMES BYRNE: Great photo, Fraser. Thanks for your time and co-operation, and good luck to you in the future.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
http://www.secretoftheincas.co.uk/page33.html
YMA SUMAC – the real secret of the Incas
Yma Sumac is the real secret of the incas; a bewitching, tantalizing, outrageous, magnificent, uniquely talented singer who has succeeded in remaining an enigma to her fans for over half a century. Her life is shrouded in exotic mystery, made even more complicated and confusing by the ludicrous publicity machine that dreamt up and pored forth sensational biographies of unimagined silliness in the early 1950’s which condemned her to be known forever as the “Queen of kitsch”. Strange as it may seem, I actually enjoy all those absurd and fantastic legends that were concocted to sell her LP records and discs. When you hear her voice for the first time and discover the miraculous musical madams 4 octave range, which instantly transport you to another world, but only really exists in your own imagination, you can forgive those publicity guys for inventing such surreal biographies.
I didn’t have a clue who Yma Sumac was when my father took me to see Secret Of The Incas in May1963, when I was ten years old. In the foyer of the cinema was an impressive display of glossy publicity stills showing a beautiful, exotic-looking woman, heavily made up and posing in some very fancy attire. I thought she was the most gorgeous lady I had ever seen. “That’s Yma Sumac, son” dad told me, “She has a wonderful untrained voice, and about ten years ago she was all the rage”. Looking at those publicity photos again, I thought to myself “She’s all the rage to me now”, and this was before I had encountered her voice!
The Yma Sumac story reads like one of the plots of those Hollywood music biographies of the 40’s, like The Jolson Story or The Great Caruso. A teenage sensation at a music festival on the outskirts of Lima, Peru, she went to America and became an overnight phenomenon, her album Voice of the Xtabay even knocked Bing Crosby off the number one spot in the charts. Her records featured exciting, colourful covers with exaggerated biographies on the back sleeve which at first were thought to be true,but later became a thorn in her side, inducing laughter in many cases. Paramount jumped aboard the publicity bandwagon and a role was specially written for her in Secret Of The Incas as the archaeological assisstant to Robert Young. Yma Sumac’s appearance in this colourful precursor to the Indiana Jones saga had a great effect on me as a ten year old boy in 1963. She reminded me of Judith Anderson as Mrs. Danvers in the Hitchcock classic Rebecca, but nowhere as sinister. Madame Sumac moved with grace and poise, and looked a real class act. Her training in music and ballet by Gamaiel Concha Vargas, from Cuzco, was evident in a couple of scenes. Look at the way she glides with effortless ease as she carries the water to fill Nicole Maurey’s bath in the temple at Machu Picchu. Yma Sumac has been criticized in print for her supposedly poor lip-synching during a couple of the music numbers in Secret Of The Incas. The first time I saw her perform “Virgin of the Sun” and “Earthquake” in the film had a tremendous effect on me. To this day I have never seen anything so bizarre and totally outrageous in a B-movie adventure flick. I never forgot her performing those “Inca folk songs” in that way and longed to see and hear her voice again. I had to wait three years for Secret Of The Incas to be shown on television, and alas, the black and white television recording paled next to the memory of her in glorious technicolor on the cinema screen. You should only experience Secret Of The Incas at a movie theatre.
My biggest regret is not booking my trip to Peru a year earlier. I was there in May 2007 and had the greatest experience of my life. Exactly a year before Yma Sumac made her final trip to Peru to receive The Order of the Sun for her outstanding contribution to the arts, which is the highest honour a Peruvian can be awarded. Previous recipients were presidents and royalty. She even recreated the final reel of Secret Of The Incas by singing at the Temple of the Sun to a small, but very priveliged, audience of onlookers. It sickens me that I missed the living legend Yma Sumac actually displaying that amazing voice at the top of Machu Picchu. I later wrote to Madam Sumac and tried to explain the nature of her appeal to me, and how fascinating, exhilarating and utterly miraculous her voice is. To my great joy I received a reply and the wonderful lady even sent me some signed photos from Secret Of The Incas that I will treasure forever.
______________________________________________________________________
http://www.secretoftheincas.co.uk/page14.html
CHARLTON HESTON
Supreme Cinematic Hero of All-Time
Charlton Heston and his wife Lydia Clarke were touring in the play “Love Letters” at selected British theatres in August 1997. Oxford, Norwich, Newcastle and my home town Lincoln were the lucky cities chosen to showcase this two-character play, which was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize for Drama. All four venues sold out almost immediately, testament to the Star Quality of Charlton Heston. Even though I had previously met Heston in London in 1985, this was something very special, and I could hardly contain my excitement when the local newspaper, Lincolnshire Echo, proudly proclaimed on the front page “Behold, Moses cometh to the city”. After their performance at the Theatre Royal, the Heston’s received a four-minute standing ovation, but I don’t think the rapturous reception was for their “Love Letters” performance, excellent as it was. The cheering, stomping multitude were really giving thanks to Heston for all his magnificent performances as Moses, Ben-Hur and El Cid. Bouquets were presented to them, prompting Mr. Heston to step forward and give a speech, extolling the virtues of the good people of Lincoln and how impressed he was with the beauty and history of my home town. Another standing ovation, and then hundreds lined up to get their copies of “In the Arena” signed. When he had signed hundreds of those, everybody queued up to get their programmes autographed.
The next day, the Heston’s were taken on a tour of the historic sites of Lincoln in the Mayor’s limousine. At the Guildhall he was photographed with the Richard III sword, presented to the city in 1386. After receiving a civic gift from the Mayor, Heston explained to the council chamber that he had nothing to give in return, so he just stood up and performed Prospero’s farewell speech from Shakespeare’s “The Tempest”. After that he was driven up Lindum Hill so he could have a look at our splendid Cathedral, the third largest in England after York Minister and St. Paul’s. I met Mr. Heston outside the Cathedral just as he was getting out of the limo, and was pleasantly surprised when he told me he remembered me from the theatre the night before, when we had a chat about his movies. I walked around the Cathedral with the Heston’s and he was very interested to learn that Buffalo Bill, Henry VIII and Sir Thomas More had also visited Lincoln Cathedral. Chuck had portrayed those great historical figures. I had to marvel at the graciousness of Charlton Heston and the kindness he showed to complete strangers. Excited fans kept stopping him, asking for autographs and saying the same things he must have heard at least a million times before. I lost count of the number of times people said “Loved you as Moses and Ben-Hur,” etc. and Mr. Heston reacted as if it was the first time he had heard the compliment. “Great guy”, I thought to myself, and realised what a genuinely nice person he really was, treating everyone he met with respect. Before he left the Cathedral, he popped a huge wad of money into the Restoration Box, a very generous gesture from a noble man.
Since I started this site, the great Charlton Heston has sadly died, after a long and courageous struggle with Alzheimers. The “Hollywood colossus from a bygone age” (Guardian headline) received the unusual distinction of having his death recorded on the front of The Times with a photograph framed by a black border, in the manner of a Victorian mourning card. Charlton Heston was much more than a Hollywood Superstar, in the 1950’s he actively opposed Joe McCarthy; campaigned for John F. Kennedy and marched with Martin Luther King. On the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, Heston proclaimed King as a “20th century Moses”. He was honoured by five U.S. presidents for his notable achievements, and on the screen played 3 presidents, 3 saints and 2 geniuses. Charlton Heston was a great man who played great men, and I am proud to say that I once shook his hand. Rest in peace Old Warrior.
___________________________________________________________________
http://www.secretoftheincas.co.uk/page8.html
Discuss
Discuss this movie and many others at IMDB.COM
Hear
Listen to the Lux Radio presentation of SECRET OF THE INCAS also available for download. Aired in December 1954 and starring Charlton Heston and Nicole Maurey
Watch
Ebay and Yammering Magpie are about the only source of DVD's until Paramount decide to release this officially.
Read
Read Fraser Heston’s moving eulogy to his Father here.
Dress
Dress like Harry Steele/Indiana Jones with one of the fantastic A2 Flying Jackets from the Wested Leather Co. and a Fedora from Bailey Briar. Complete the look with a silk aviator scarf. Chinos and white T's are available everywhere from Supermarkets to Department Stores, so If you want the Steele look, it wont be hard to put together. Just be prepared for everyone to mistake it for the "Indy" look.
Visit the Doctor
Dr. Macro is a fantastic resource for high quality scans of movie stars. Also some .wmv video files. The Heston gallery can be found here. Because of the high quality of these scans, they can take some time to load, frustratingly slow if you are on dial up.
Go to the Movies
Another worthwhile site documenting the diversity of Movie Theatre Architecture. Lists in excess of 20,000 Cinema's worldwide and has photos of approx 1600.
Contact Me...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Secret_of_the_Incas
PlotAn Incan legend states that the Inca Empire was destroyed by the gods when a gold and jeweled starburst was stolen from the Temple of the Sun centuries ago, and that the ancient civilization will be reborn once the treasure is returned. Harry Steele (Charlton Heston), an American adventurer, is seeking the artifact, as is his nemesis Ed Morgan (Thomas Mitchell), along with Elena Antonescu (Nicole Maurey), an Iron Curtain refugee.
ProductionSecret of the Incas was filmed by Paramount Pictures on location in Peru at Cuzco and Machu Picchu, the first time that a major Hollywood studio filmed at this archeological site. Five hundred native Indians were used as extras in the film.[1] The film also featured the Peruvian singer Yma Sumac as Kori-Tica. The film caused a surge in tourism to Peru in 1954.
Influence on Raiders of the Lost Ark
Charlton Heston and Nicole MaureyThe film is often cited by film buffs as a direct inspiration for the Indiana Jones franchise of films, with many of the scenes in Secret of the Incas bearing a striking resemblance in tone and structure to scenes in Raiders of the Lost Ark. Throughout Secret of the Incas, the main character, Harry Steele, can be seen wearing the "Indiana Jones" outfit - brown leather jacket, fedora, tan pants, an over-the-shoulder bag, and revolver.[2] The character also sometimes wears a light beard, unusual for films of its time, and there is a tomb scene involving a revelatory shaft of light similar to the "Map Room" sequence in Raiders.
Raiders' costume designer Deborah Nadoolman Landis noted that the inspiration for Indiana's costume was Charlton Heston's Harry Steele in Secret of the Incas: "We did watch this film together as a crew several times, and I always thought it strange that the filmmakers did not credit it later as the inspiration for the series" and quipped that the film is "almost a shot for shot Raiders of the Lost Ark."[3]
Secret of the Incas
19541hr 41mNRYou rated this movie: 5 Rate 5 starsRate 4 starsRate 3 starsRate 2 starsRate 1 starNot InterestedClearSaving.....Edward's rating:
5 stars.Average of 18,796 ratings:
3.2 stars ..Rugged American adventurer Harry Steele (Charlton Heston), who works as a tour guide in Peru, possesses part of a map leading to an invaluable Inca artifact and is racing to locate it before it's found by archaeologist Stanley Moorehead (Robert Young) or con man Ed Morgan (Thomas Mitchell). Using an airplane stolen with the help of a Romanian refugee (Nicole Maurey), Harry continues his quest at the stunning and treacherous Machu Picchu.
Some say this movie was the inspiration for elements of the Indiana Jones movies, and you can see that in this highly entertaining Charlton Heston adventure. Heston is an American living in Peru who makes a living giving tours to American tourists while trying to uncover the secret location of the Sunburst - an enormous jewel encrusted gold object created by the Incans that has been lost for hundreds of years. He teams up with a pretty Romanian, steals a plane, outwits the evil Ed Morgan, and eventually does the right thing. One thing that makes this movie compelling is that it is shot on location in Peru. Its just a really fun movie to watch and until recently has been hard to find.
Gee, do you think George Lucas and Stevie Spielberg may have seen this movie when they were kids? Charlton Heston edges out even Harrison Ford in the "Indiana Jones" role. All that's lacking is the bullwhip. The villain is deliciously creepy, right through to his final death-scream (more like a hoar...read morese croak), and the subtle artistic touches - like the ever-present stain on his vest, are from an earlier age of movie-making. Yet, as repugnant and devoid of scruples as he is, the film-makers also manage to create some compassion for him in the end. Very well-paced movie from an earlier age when audiences were more patient, and allowed for some actual character and plot development before getting to the good stuff. And the good stuff is indeed very good - and worth the wait. Robert Young is also fun in the kindly doctor role, presaging his later stint as Marcus Welby, M.D. Find out where Raiders of the Lost Ark really came from.
http://www.t-g.com/blogs/brianmosely/entry/17975/
Charlton Heston as Harry Steele in the 1954 film "Secret of the Incas," who has more than a few things in common with a popular film icon that will be returning to a theater near you next month.The recent passing of film legend Charlton Heston has had many a movie enthusiast mourning this loss. From the parting of the Red Sea, to chariot races, to finding the ruins of the Statue of Liberty, Heston played a wide variety of classic cinematic roles.
Including Indiana Jones.
Wait. Harrison Ford is returning next month to the classic role, right? Well, yes he is, but way before that, before Heston told Yul Brenner to let his people go, there was the1954 Paramount film entitled "Secret of the Incas," which has more than a few similarities to "Raiders of the Lost Ark."
In fact, after watching the unknown film for the first time this weekend, I believe George Lucas and Steven Spielberg have a bit of explaining to do when it comes to fully attributing the inspiration of the Indiana Jones character.
The film stars Heston, who plays square-jawed Harry Steele, a womanizing con artist getting by as a tour guide in the historic areas of Peru, that is, when he's not treasure hunting. He's been looking for the legendary diamond encrusted, solid gold Sunburst hidden in the ruins of Machu Picchu for years, but has had no success, until events begin to go his way.
So why do I say that Spielberg and Lucas lifted the character from this forgotten low budget film and turned him into the daring archaeologist we all know?
Because Steele looks exactly like Indiana Jones. And I mean an absolute spitting image of the film icon.
In fact, according to Wikipedia, the costume designer for "Raiders" said that the inspiration for Jones was Harry Steele.
"We did watch this film together as a crew several times, and I always thought it strange that the filmmakers did not credit it later as the inspiration for the series."
So do I.
Not only that, he's the only one possessing the crucial piece needed to find the location of the priceless Inca Sunburst. And for a swindling ladies man, he certainly knows quite a bit about South American archeology. The similarities to Indiana Jones doesn't end there. To figure out the location of the sacred artifact, he uses the old reflecting light trick seen in "Raiders" when Indiana is looking for the Well of Lost Souls, to find the treasure.
The film was released by Paramount and I find it quite interesting that this movie isn't available from the studio that released the Indiana Jones series, or for that matter, through your regular on-line retail outlets like Amazon. Or anywhere else. In fact, the copy I just got, which is a fine print of this lost film, is an obviously homemade DVD, and it took a while for this film buff to track down.
If I were a raving conspiracy theorist, I'd suggest that Lucas and Spielberg had the studio bury this vintage film so that movie buffs would never know where they got the idea for the adventure-seeking archaeologist that made them millions.
But that's just silly. They wouldn't do that. It's just a bunch of coincidences, right? That would be like saying "Star Wars" and its style was really based on a samurai film from the 1950's. What was I thinking...
In any case, I'm looking forward to watching the latest Indiana Jones film in May. But, I'm going to be checking the credits for a special thanks to Charlton, too. I hope I see it.
Let's give credit where credit is due.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments
Showing comments in chronological order
[Show most recent comments first]
Amen.
We owe a lot to the old pulp characters.
Often,we create new riffs on ancient stories without realizing that the conventions and cliches we love were once original and fresh when introduced years ago.
If not for remakes,revivals and pastiches,a younger generation might never know of the plots,the characters or the people who brought them to life.
Frank Reade,Jack Armstrong,Johhny Brainerd,Bulldog Drummond and others of their eras gave birth to Tom Swift and Johnny Quest as surely as Horatio Hornblower begat James Tiberius Kirk and Modesty Blaise gave birth to Sidney Bristow.
Whether we enjoy Henry Jones' baby boy,that Bond fellow,Emma Peel,the Maverick Brothers or Jessica Fletcher,we need to thank Steele (and Heston),Miss Marple,Raffles,Honey West and all the others who started those genres.
-- Posted by quantumcat on Sun, Apr 27, 2008, at 6:06 PM
Charlton Heston was indeed the definitive Indiana Jones prototype in SECRET OF THE INCAS. I saw this wonderful adventure movie as a kid and it inspired me to travel to Peru last year to explore all the locations shown in the movie, like Machu Picchu and Cuzco. I had the greatest two weeks of my life in Peru ... thanks to SECRET OF THE INCAS. Charlton Heston was also amazingly similar to Indiana Jones in the terrific circus epic THE GREATEST SHOW ON EARTH, coincidently Spielberg's favourite movie as a child. I have devoted a site to SECRET OF THE INCAS, where you can compare Heston's Harry Steele to Spielberg's Indiana Jones.
http://incas.mysite.orange.co.uk
-- Posted by James Byrne on Tue, Apr 29, 2008, at 4:19 AM
I just watched Willow (another George Lucas movie) again for the first time since I was a kid, and it seemed to be a copy of the Hobbit series. I love all of the Lucas movies, but he is seeming to come across a little unoriginal.
-- Posted by greasemonkey on Wed, Apr 30, 2008, at 8:12 PM
The link to my site on SECRET OF THE INCAS has changed. You can now view my site on this great precursor to Indiana Jones at :
www.secretoftheincas.co.uk
-- Posted by James Byrne on Tue, Sep 9, 2008, at 4:54 AM
From Kirkus Reviews
http://www.amazon.com/The-Secret-Incas-Astronomy-Against/dp/0517888513
The Secret of the Incas: Myth, Astronomy, and the War Against Time [Paperback]
William Sullivan
A sometimes murky, frequently meandering excursion into the meaning of ancient Andean beliefs, arguing that in a series of sophisticated myths Incan soothsayers foretold their own civilization's doom at the hands of Pizarro and his conquistadors in 1532. Sullivan, a scholar of Native American cultures, begins with a question that has perplexed historians of the Spanish conquest: How could the vast Inca Empire, with its millions of subjects, have been conquered overnight by a band of 170 Spanish adventurers? Sullivan digs into the history and mythology of Andean civilization to find what he feels is the answer: For hundreds of years the sages of the Andes had believed that astronomical transitions presaged earthly cataclysms; reading changes in the night skies in the 1400s, Incan priest-astronomers foretold the imminent destruction of their own recently founded empire. Sullivan argues, in a sometimes hyperbolic first-person account (``In that moment I had, I believed, touched for an instant the terrible burden and tragic urgency of the Inca vision''), that the Incas followed the planets, recorded precessional events in their myths, and equated social and celestial changes. He further asserts that elements in Incan culture preceding Pizarro's arrival--constant warfare and the Incan ritual of human sacrifice--represented an attempt to halt the march of time and prevent the apocalyptic events foreshadowed by changes in the night sky. The Incas assumed that the arrival of Pizarro represented the culmination of the prophecy and the failure of their own efforts to prevent its occurrence. The thread of the author's argument can be hard to follow. Still, Sullivan's deep feeling for Andean folk materials, and the originality of his observations about Andean astronomy, make his text worthwhile for those interested in the history of South American civilization and for those who, in the wake of Joseph Campbell's works, seek enduring meaning in ancient mythology. (History Book Club and One Spirit Book Club alternate selections) -- Copyright ©1996, Kirkus Associates, LP. All rights reserved. --This text refers to an out of print or unavailable edition of this title.
William Sullivan decodes the myths of the Incas.
Secrets of the Incas chronicles how Dr Sullivan first learned to decode ancient Andean myths. These myths - which were recorded by the Spanish at the time of their conquest of the Incas - are, according to Dr Sullivan, a 'message in a bottle' from the Incas to future generations. Dr Sullivan describes how he decoded the myths and how this led him to certain important dates in Andean prehistory and history. A glossary defines and explains various Andean mythological and historical terms, and a timeline shows what Dr Sullivan believes to be the correspondence between mythological, astronomical and archaeological events in the high Andes - how, in effect, what was happening in the heavens was mirrored by what was happening on Earth
On the evening of 15 November 1532, a band of 175 hardened Spanish adventurers crossed a pass in the high Andes. Looking down upon a broad, fertile valley in northern Peru, they became the first Europeans to make contact with the Incas, whose highly developed empire stretched 3,000 miles from Chile to Colombia and had a population of six million. On the following day, in what ranks as one of the strangest events in all recorded history, the Spaniards managed to seize the Inca king Atahuallpa and, in the ensuing panic, used the advantage of their 120 warhorses to kill and wound 10,000 Inca warriors. From that day onward, through luck and guile, and with reinforcements soon pouring in from Panama, the Spaniards - who came in search of gold and glory, in the name of the Roman Catholic Church - never relinquished the edge they seized in that first fateful encounter.
What the Spaniards never knew, and what history does not record, was the reason for the apparently inexplicable collapse of the greatest land empire on the face of the Earth
SECRET OF THE INCAS
Harry Steele is a tough young American soldier of fortune, eking out a living as a tour guide in Cuzco, Peru. He has heard the legend of the Inca treasure, a fabulous golden Sunburst which has been missing for centuries, and his intention, when he can get hold of a private plane, is to head for the long lost Inca city of Machu Picchu.
There is a legend among the Quechua Indians that the Inca Empire will be restored when the Sunburst is found. It is believed to be hidden in the tomb of Manco, last of the Inca chiefs. Harry has come into the possession of a fragment of an ancient stone map which points to the secret location of the treasure.
Steele is bored with his tour guide work and supplements his tedious job with a bit of gigolo work in his spare time. Bored tourists, like the middle-aged Mrs Winston, keep him busy with this extra occupation. Treacherous wheeler-dealer Ed Morgan occasionally does business with Harry, even though they mistrust and despise each other. Morgan knows that Harry has the stone map, and after being rebuked on a partnership deal, sends a sniper after Harry to ‘frighten’ him. Obviously shocked by the near miss from the gunman, Steele threatens the old guy and only calms down when he’s told that Morgan has lined up a little deal for him.
Morgan tells Harry that a Romanian refugee is coming to Cuzco by truck from La Paz and she needs help to get to Mexico. The Romanian Consul, Anton Marcu, has pursued her to Peru to take her back behind The Iron Curtain.
Harry meets the beautiful Elena in Cuzco Hotel, but when he finds out that she is short of cash, he isn’t interested in helping her escape. Only when Elena tells him that the Rumanian Consul has persued her to Peru in a private plane is Harry willing to help her. Having telephoned the consul giving him Elena’s whereabouts, Harry strikes a deal with Elena, knowing that she’s now helpless to refuse.
SECRET OF THE INCAS
Harry Steele is a tough young American soldier of fortune, eking out a living as a tour guide in Cuzco, Peru. He has heard the legend of the Inca treasure, a fabulous golden Sunburst which has been missing for centuries, and his intention, when he can get hold of a private plane, is to head for the long lost Inca city of Machu Picchu.
There is a legend among the Quechua Indians that the Inca Empire will be restored when the Sunburst is found. It is believed to be hidden in the tomb of Manco, last of the Inca chiefs. Harry has come into the possession of a fragment of an ancient stone map which points to the secret location of the treasure.
Steele is bored with his tour guide work and supplements his tedious job with a bit of gigolo work in his spare time. Bored tourists, like the middle-aged Mrs Winston, keep him busy with this extra occupation. Treacherous wheeler-dealer Ed Morgan occasionally does business with Harry, even though they mistrust and despise each other. Morgan knows that Harry has the stone map, and after being rebuked on a partnership deal, sends a sniper after Harry to ‘frighten’ him. Obviously shocked by the near miss from the gunman, Steele threatens the old guy and only calms down when he’s told that Morgan has lined up a little deal for him.
Morgan tells Harry that a Romanian refugee is coming to Cuzco by truck from La Paz and she needs help to get to Mexico. The Romanian Consul, Anton Marcu, has pursued her to Peru to take her back behind The Iron Curtain.
Harry meets the beautiful Elena in Cuzco Hotel, but when he finds out that she is short of cash, he isn’t interested in helping her escape. Only when Elena tells him that the Rumanian Consul has persued her to Peru in a private plane is Harry willing to help her. Having telephoned the consul giving him Elena’s whereabouts, Harry strikes a deal with Elena, knowing that she’s now helpless to refuse.
He asks her to steal the plane keys from Anton Marcu and they fly to the mystical village in the Andes, Machu Picchu. Having to land ten miles outside the Inca village, they set off on an arduous trek through the jungles of Peru. When they arrive at the ruins of Machu Picchu, they see that an archaeological expedition, headed by Dr Stanley Moorehead, is encamped on the spot. Pachacutec, the leader of the local Quechuan community, and his sister, Kori-Tica, both mistrust the pair, but the others in the expedition give them a warm welcome. Harry explains their presence by saying they were forced down when their plane ran out of gas.
In the evening while watching a sacred Inca ritual ceremony performed by Kori-Tica in the ruins, Dr Moorehead expresses his love for the beautiful refugee Elena. Ed Morgan arrives at the camp, and forces Steele to hand over the stone map, but is forced to go fifty-fifty with Harry because he doesn’t know how to read it. Dr Moorehead proposes marriage to Elena at the Intihuantana but she is more attracted to the rough, tough Harry Steele, but his lying, scheming nature prove to be a barrier.
The archaeological expedition mistakenly think they have finally discovered the long lost Sunburst, but it is only a stone replica. While Ed Morgan is asleep, Harry retrieves the stone map and enters the tomb discovering the real jewel encrusted golden Sunburst. Morgan follows him and shoots at Harry, making off with the Sunburst. The noise wakens the whole camp and they chase Morgan to the top of Machu Picchu.
Steele takes a short cut and is waiting for Morgan, after a brief scuffle Morgan falls to his death and Steele returns the Sunburst to the Quechuan community. He and Elena then head off to make a new life together
It’s true, if it wasn’t for SECRET OF THE INCAS, we wouldn’t have had the most exciting, extraordinary experience of our married life, a totally unique action-packed holiday that was worth all the worry and the planning, the expense, the yellow fever jabs, the anti-malaria tablets, the stomach upsets and the horrendous 15 hour flight (thank God for Bill Bryson). Peru is a land of intrigue, where tales of lost cities, fabulous treasures and sun-worshipping natives vanquished by ruthless conquistadors abound. This is a land of colourful people, exotic birds, great lakes and remote forests. As a kid, my imagination was stirred by watching Hollywood movies about American tough guys hunting for lost cities in the darkest jungles of South America, and SECRET OF THE INCAS was, without a shadow of a doubt, the best of these.
____________________________________________________________________
http://www.secretoftheincas.co.uk/page28.html
FRASER HESTON in conversation with JAMES BYRNE.
(6-12 May 2008)
JAMES BYRNE: I love a movie you wrote and produced, Mother Lode, in which your father also directed and starred in. The plot – about a group of adventurers searching for the Mother Lode in a secret cavern – has slight elements of the Secret of the Incas plot. My children pointed out to me that the beginning of Mother Lode, the tough guy hero in the aeroplane flying over the terrific scenery, resembled Harry Steele flying over the Andes. Fraser, did watching any of your father’s old adventure movies from the 1950’s influence you at all when writing Mother Lode?
FRASER HESTON: Thanks James, much appreciated. I’m sure there are some unintentional similarities – Mother Lode’s a treasure hunt film after all, but I made no conscious effort to emulate anything from Incas – more like a homage to another great treasure hunt film (the greatest ever): Treasure of the Sierra Madre.
JAMES BYRNE: I agree with you Fraser, Treasure of the SierraMadre is the greatest treasure hunt movie of ‘em all. Here’s an interesting little titbit I noticed when watching the Bogey classic. Fred C. Dobbs’ final words are “Burro, burro,” coincidently the first words spoken by Chuck Heston in Secret of the Incas, and the sunburst seekers in Incas are very similar to the Sierra Madre treasure hunters. Maybe the Incas scriptwriters were slightly influenced by the Bogey movie, who knows? As a scriptwriter, producer and director, Fraser, do you think it’s tempting to ‘pop in’ little homages to old classics as part of the plot of your own movie?
FRASER HESTON: I don’t think this happens as much as film critics allege – homages (or rip-offs as they are more often called) probably happen inadvertently as often as not, or subconsciously, thinking “Wouldn’t it be cool if this happened …” but forgetting you saw it in some other film first! Obviously there are exceptions, obvious homages and spoofs, but mostly we’re desperately working away, trying to come up with something original!
JAMES BYRNE: Most people who venture to Peru go on the ‘Inca Trail’, but I was slightly different, I went on the ‘Harry Steele Trail’, and made a point of touring all the locations seen in Secret of the Incas. Did you visit any of the places in Cuzco that Harry Steele hung out in the movie when you visited Peru, Fraser?
FRASER HESTON: Yes. I visited Cuzco, Sacsayhuaman, and Machu Picchu. I also travelled up the Amazon, by plane, river steamer (think Fitzcarraldo), motorized canoe and a dugout from Belem at the mouth up to Iquitos, and then eventually aways up the Ucayali, and then came to the Urubamba (below Machu Picchu) by train. Had a blast.
JAMES BYRNE: Sounds terrific Fraser. You also climbed Huayma Picchu at Machu Picchu, it sure looked a daunting prospect to me as I stood at the foot of it … was it as dangerous as it looked?
FRASER HESTON: I didn’t think it was all that dangerous, but there is certainly some exposure when you climb through a little cave, and pop out onto an airy little traverse overlooking the Urubamba valley about a thousand feet below. Nothing of any technical difficulty however and well worth the effort. I also got locked into the ruins after hours when I lost track of time in the fog. Security guard found me and turfed me out. Very cool experience.
JAMES BYRNE: Wow! The son of Harry Steele lost in the ruins of Machu Picchu! Fraser, your mother is an accomplished photographer and often went on location with her husband, and took some terrific shots. Has she ever considered writing a book … and using all those great behind-the-scenes location photos she took over the years?
FRASER HESTON: I have often been asked, “Your life was like Indiana Jones – one adventure after another – was it your father who inspired your adventures?” In fact, I say, it was my mother who was Indiana Jones, who dragged us up all those pyramids from Sacarra to Chichen Itza, ruin-running from Hadrian’s Wall to the Acropolis, museum marching from the British Museum to the Met. She’s published a couple of books, several photo shows and retrospectives, and is still going strong, at 84.
JAMES BYRNE: She’s a great lady, Fraser. For many years now, fans of Secret of the Incas have been literally begging for its release onto video and dvd. Have you any idea why Paramount won’t release this wonderful movie?
FRASER HESTON: I agree! I’m not sure Paramount is resisting releasing that, per se, but they’ve got a lot of old films (thousands in fact!) and I suppose eventually they’ll get around to releasing all of them. Let’s hope Incas is sooner than later!
JAMES BYRNE: I would like to congratulate you on your marvellous version of Treasure Island. It must have been a daunting prospect bringing a different variation on an oft-filmed classic. I notice that your adaptation is more realistic than the other movies, in particular the Disney version. Any thoughts on the making of this film?
FRASER HESTON: Thanks – another treasure hunt movie if there ever was one: and the best pirate story ever. And my favourite book – my dad read it to me dozens of times from the age of five! We tried to make this the most faithful to the book, and the most real, gritty version, with authentic sea faring stuff (we used the H.M.S. Bounty, provided by Ted Turner who got it from MGM) and pirates who would sooner cut your throat than look at you. Did we succeed?
JAMES BYRNE: Yes Fraser, you more than succeeded in making the pirates in Treasure Island look far more realistic than in the earlier versions. You got great performances from your father as Long John Silver and Oliver Reed as Billy Bones. In fact, all the cast really did look like gin-soaked nasty sea-dogs, particularly Reed and Pete Postlethwait. Ollie Reed had a bit of a reputation over here in England as being ‘very thirsty’. Did Ollie behave himself on the set … was he easy to work with?
FRASER HESTON: Thanks for the compliment. I loved directing Treasure Island with dad – a childhood fantasy come true. Oliver, in the event, though we were concerned at first, behaved himself very well, and delivered a stunning performance in my opinion. Though he could booze with the best of them, and eventually and tragically drank himself to death, as I understand it, he was professional with us at all times. We had a great cast in that film, including Christian Bale (who came all the way across America just to attend my father’s memorial) Christopher Lee, Julian Glover, Pete Postlethwait and of course Ollie, and not to mention Charlton Heston. It was a director’s dream come true and I was like a kid in the candy store with all those wonderful English actors. It’d be honoured to work with any of ‘em again in a heartbeat.
JAMES BYRNE: Yes, Treasure Island was a great movie, Fraser. What is your favourite Charlton Heston movie … and why?
FRASER HESTON: Two of them: Ben-Hur because it’s an amazing film, and stands up very well today. Just incredible. And Will Penny – a little western dad made up in the High Sierra, where I will spread some of his ashes in a few weeks, because it’s a hell of a movie and one of my dad’s personal favourites.
JAMES BYRNE: Fraser, you appeared as the infant Moses in The Ten Commandments, which is one of my family’s favourite movies. Obviously, you won’t be able to remember a single thing about making the movie, but did you ever meet any of the stars of the movie when you were older … and if so, what did they say to you?
FRASER HESTON: I’m sure I must have met Yul Brynner when I was very young, but don’t recall what he said. I did meet Cecil B. De Mille later (I’m the youngest actor in his last film as a director, and therefore, I am probably the last actor to ever work with C. B. DeMille). Here’s a photo for you – the inscription reads:
“To a fine young actor in a gripping situation. From his director, - C. B. DeMille. All three of us made the Ten Commandments.”
JAMES BYRNE: Great photo, Fraser. Thanks for your time and co-operation, and good luck to you in the future.
________________________________________________________________________________________________________
http://www.secretoftheincas.co.uk/page33.html
YMA SUMAC – the real secret of the Incas
Yma Sumac is the real secret of the incas; a bewitching, tantalizing, outrageous, magnificent, uniquely talented singer who has succeeded in remaining an enigma to her fans for over half a century. Her life is shrouded in exotic mystery, made even more complicated and confusing by the ludicrous publicity machine that dreamt up and pored forth sensational biographies of unimagined silliness in the early 1950’s which condemned her to be known forever as the “Queen of kitsch”. Strange as it may seem, I actually enjoy all those absurd and fantastic legends that were concocted to sell her LP records and discs. When you hear her voice for the first time and discover the miraculous musical madams 4 octave range, which instantly transport you to another world, but only really exists in your own imagination, you can forgive those publicity guys for inventing such surreal biographies.
I didn’t have a clue who Yma Sumac was when my father took me to see Secret Of The Incas in May1963, when I was ten years old. In the foyer of the cinema was an impressive display of glossy publicity stills showing a beautiful, exotic-looking woman, heavily made up and posing in some very fancy attire. I thought she was the most gorgeous lady I had ever seen. “That’s Yma Sumac, son” dad told me, “She has a wonderful untrained voice, and about ten years ago she was all the rage”. Looking at those publicity photos again, I thought to myself “She’s all the rage to me now”, and this was before I had encountered her voice!
The Yma Sumac story reads like one of the plots of those Hollywood music biographies of the 40’s, like The Jolson Story or The Great Caruso. A teenage sensation at a music festival on the outskirts of Lima, Peru, she went to America and became an overnight phenomenon, her album Voice of the Xtabay even knocked Bing Crosby off the number one spot in the charts. Her records featured exciting, colourful covers with exaggerated biographies on the back sleeve which at first were thought to be true,but later became a thorn in her side, inducing laughter in many cases. Paramount jumped aboard the publicity bandwagon and a role was specially written for her in Secret Of The Incas as the archaeological assisstant to Robert Young. Yma Sumac’s appearance in this colourful precursor to the Indiana Jones saga had a great effect on me as a ten year old boy in 1963. She reminded me of Judith Anderson as Mrs. Danvers in the Hitchcock classic Rebecca, but nowhere as sinister. Madame Sumac moved with grace and poise, and looked a real class act. Her training in music and ballet by Gamaiel Concha Vargas, from Cuzco, was evident in a couple of scenes. Look at the way she glides with effortless ease as she carries the water to fill Nicole Maurey’s bath in the temple at Machu Picchu. Yma Sumac has been criticized in print for her supposedly poor lip-synching during a couple of the music numbers in Secret Of The Incas. The first time I saw her perform “Virgin of the Sun” and “Earthquake” in the film had a tremendous effect on me. To this day I have never seen anything so bizarre and totally outrageous in a B-movie adventure flick. I never forgot her performing those “Inca folk songs” in that way and longed to see and hear her voice again. I had to wait three years for Secret Of The Incas to be shown on television, and alas, the black and white television recording paled next to the memory of her in glorious technicolor on the cinema screen. You should only experience Secret Of The Incas at a movie theatre.
My biggest regret is not booking my trip to Peru a year earlier. I was there in May 2007 and had the greatest experience of my life. Exactly a year before Yma Sumac made her final trip to Peru to receive The Order of the Sun for her outstanding contribution to the arts, which is the highest honour a Peruvian can be awarded. Previous recipients were presidents and royalty. She even recreated the final reel of Secret Of The Incas by singing at the Temple of the Sun to a small, but very priveliged, audience of onlookers. It sickens me that I missed the living legend Yma Sumac actually displaying that amazing voice at the top of Machu Picchu. I later wrote to Madam Sumac and tried to explain the nature of her appeal to me, and how fascinating, exhilarating and utterly miraculous her voice is. To my great joy I received a reply and the wonderful lady even sent me some signed photos from Secret Of The Incas that I will treasure forever.
______________________________________________________________________
http://www.secretoftheincas.co.uk/page14.html
CHARLTON HESTON
Supreme Cinematic Hero of All-Time
Charlton Heston and his wife Lydia Clarke were touring in the play “Love Letters” at selected British theatres in August 1997. Oxford, Norwich, Newcastle and my home town Lincoln were the lucky cities chosen to showcase this two-character play, which was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize for Drama. All four venues sold out almost immediately, testament to the Star Quality of Charlton Heston. Even though I had previously met Heston in London in 1985, this was something very special, and I could hardly contain my excitement when the local newspaper, Lincolnshire Echo, proudly proclaimed on the front page “Behold, Moses cometh to the city”. After their performance at the Theatre Royal, the Heston’s received a four-minute standing ovation, but I don’t think the rapturous reception was for their “Love Letters” performance, excellent as it was. The cheering, stomping multitude were really giving thanks to Heston for all his magnificent performances as Moses, Ben-Hur and El Cid. Bouquets were presented to them, prompting Mr. Heston to step forward and give a speech, extolling the virtues of the good people of Lincoln and how impressed he was with the beauty and history of my home town. Another standing ovation, and then hundreds lined up to get their copies of “In the Arena” signed. When he had signed hundreds of those, everybody queued up to get their programmes autographed.
The next day, the Heston’s were taken on a tour of the historic sites of Lincoln in the Mayor’s limousine. At the Guildhall he was photographed with the Richard III sword, presented to the city in 1386. After receiving a civic gift from the Mayor, Heston explained to the council chamber that he had nothing to give in return, so he just stood up and performed Prospero’s farewell speech from Shakespeare’s “The Tempest”. After that he was driven up Lindum Hill so he could have a look at our splendid Cathedral, the third largest in England after York Minister and St. Paul’s. I met Mr. Heston outside the Cathedral just as he was getting out of the limo, and was pleasantly surprised when he told me he remembered me from the theatre the night before, when we had a chat about his movies. I walked around the Cathedral with the Heston’s and he was very interested to learn that Buffalo Bill, Henry VIII and Sir Thomas More had also visited Lincoln Cathedral. Chuck had portrayed those great historical figures. I had to marvel at the graciousness of Charlton Heston and the kindness he showed to complete strangers. Excited fans kept stopping him, asking for autographs and saying the same things he must have heard at least a million times before. I lost count of the number of times people said “Loved you as Moses and Ben-Hur,” etc. and Mr. Heston reacted as if it was the first time he had heard the compliment. “Great guy”, I thought to myself, and realised what a genuinely nice person he really was, treating everyone he met with respect. Before he left the Cathedral, he popped a huge wad of money into the Restoration Box, a very generous gesture from a noble man.
Since I started this site, the great Charlton Heston has sadly died, after a long and courageous struggle with Alzheimers. The “Hollywood colossus from a bygone age” (Guardian headline) received the unusual distinction of having his death recorded on the front of The Times with a photograph framed by a black border, in the manner of a Victorian mourning card. Charlton Heston was much more than a Hollywood Superstar, in the 1950’s he actively opposed Joe McCarthy; campaigned for John F. Kennedy and marched with Martin Luther King. On the steps of the Lincoln Memorial in Washington, Heston proclaimed King as a “20th century Moses”. He was honoured by five U.S. presidents for his notable achievements, and on the screen played 3 presidents, 3 saints and 2 geniuses. Charlton Heston was a great man who played great men, and I am proud to say that I once shook his hand. Rest in peace Old Warrior.
___________________________________________________________________
http://www.secretoftheincas.co.uk/page8.html
Discuss
Discuss this movie and many others at IMDB.COM
Hear
Listen to the Lux Radio presentation of SECRET OF THE INCAS also available for download. Aired in December 1954 and starring Charlton Heston and Nicole Maurey
Watch
Ebay and Yammering Magpie are about the only source of DVD's until Paramount decide to release this officially.
Read
Read Fraser Heston’s moving eulogy to his Father here.
Dress
Dress like Harry Steele/Indiana Jones with one of the fantastic A2 Flying Jackets from the Wested Leather Co. and a Fedora from Bailey Briar. Complete the look with a silk aviator scarf. Chinos and white T's are available everywhere from Supermarkets to Department Stores, so If you want the Steele look, it wont be hard to put together. Just be prepared for everyone to mistake it for the "Indy" look.
Visit the Doctor
Dr. Macro is a fantastic resource for high quality scans of movie stars. Also some .wmv video files. The Heston gallery can be found here. Because of the high quality of these scans, they can take some time to load, frustratingly slow if you are on dial up.
Go to the Movies
Another worthwhile site documenting the diversity of Movie Theatre Architecture. Lists in excess of 20,000 Cinema's worldwide and has photos of approx 1600.
Contact Me...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)





















