http://www.aish.com/ho/p/48952026.html
Born in Auschwitz
A woman's miraculous birth in the death camp of Auschwitz.
by Jeff Heinrich
Honor thy mother. That's the motto Angela Polgar has tried to live by all her life -- a life that began in a death camp. The place was Auschwitz-Birkenau, in southern Poland. Her parents, Hungarian Jews, arrived there on a Nazi transport on May 25, 1944.
Polgar's mother, Vera Bein, nee Otvos, was 25 years old at the time and almost two months pregnant.
On the infamous railway platform where "selections" were made, Bein, as Polgar respectfully calls her, was not sent to the gas chambers. Instead, she was assigned to a variety of gruelling work details before becoming a guinea pig for sterilization experiments by a camp doctor.
By the horrific standards of the Holocaust, it's an ordinary story, perhaps -- except for one thing. The patient survived, and so did her child.
On Dec. 21 Bein felt labour pains. She climbed to the top bunk in her barrack, and there, aided by two other inmates, gave birth in secret to a baby girl.
The infant was tiny, weighing only one kilogram; she was too weak to cry but strong enough to drink the meagre offering from her mother's breast, and somehow survived the next few weeks in hiding.
Click here to receive Aish.com's free weekly email.
The only other infant survivor, according to Auschwitz museum records, was a Hungarian boy, Gyorgy Faludi, born the day of liberation with the help of a Russian doctor.Soviet Red Army troops liberated the camp on Jan. 27, 1945. Baby and mother were among the survivors, and they were an unusual sight -- indeed, almost unique.
The only other infant survivor, according to Auschwitz museum records, was a Hungarian boy, Gyorgy Faludi, born the day of liberation with the help of a Russian doctor.
Angela Polgar has decided now is the right time to tell Canadians her family's remarkable story.
She isn't doing it to shine light on herself; she even refuses to have her picture taken, for fear people would accuse her of self-aggrandizement.
Rather, she wants to honor her mother, a woman who never liked to talk about her experience because she thought it would be a burden to her daughter.
"She was a very, very special lady," said Polgar, a former clothing store owner who lives in Montreal with her husband, Joseph.
"My mother felt so terrible for all the people who had lost their children. They lost their babies, and she brought one back," Polgar said.
"And at the same time she didn't want me to have the memories she had. So she didn't talk about it."
Telling it now is a release -- and a duty. "It has nothing to do with me, this story. She did it. She's the one who went through all this."
And so Angela Polgar begins her story.
That both mother and daughter survived at all is a miracle in itself. About 1.1 million people, mostly Jews, were exterminated at Auschwitz between the start of the organized killing in March 1942 and its end in November 1944. The death machine was at its busiest the summer that Polgar's parents and other Hungarian Jews arrived en masse to be liquidated -- more than 132,000 a month, according to Canadian scholar Robert Jan van Pelt's exhaustive study, Auschwitz: 1270 to the Present.
"By the end of June, in just two months, half of Hungary's Jewry -- 381,661 souls -- had arrived at Auschwitz," van Pelt wrote in the 1996 book he co-authored with U.S. scholar Deborah Dwork. "At no other time was Auschwitz more efficient as a killing center."
They quote one survivor, Alexander Ehrmann, who arrived at Birkenau at night and was aghast at what he saw and heard -- especially the piles of burning bracken and rubble he saw and smelled through the barbed wire.
From the pyres came the sounds of children. "I heard a baby crying. The baby was crying somewhere in the distance and I couldn't stop and look. We moved, and it smelled, a horrible stench. I knew that things in the fire were moving; there were babies in the fire."
At selection on the platform, most visibly pregnant women were sent to die; so were babies, children, the obviously sick and the elderly. Others were spared for use as slave labour or fodder for medical experimentation.
Some of the inmates in Camp C, Auschwitz's barrack for Hungarian Jewish women and girls, were able to bring their pregnancies to term, but their babies were almost invariably taken from them right after and killed -- "mercifully" strangled to death by Jewish inmate doctors forced to work for the Nazis.
Most pregnancies never got that far; the usual clandestine practice was to abort fetuses before they could be born -- a life-saving measure for the mother, who was an easy target for liquidation if her pregnancy became too obvious.
One of the Jewish physicians who routinely performed this "service" at Auschwitz, a Hungarian gynecologist named Gisella Perl, described that and worse in her 1948 memoir I Was a Doctor in Auschwitz.
Walking by one of the crematoriums one day, she witnessed what happened to one group of women who, promised better treatment, had revealed to their Nazi overlords that they were pregnant. "They were surrounded by a group of SS men and women, who amused themselves by giving these helpless creatures a taste of hell, after which death was a welcome friend," Perl recalled in her book.
"They were beaten with clubs and whips, torn by dogs, dragged around by their hair and kicked in the stomach with heavy German boots. Then, when they collapsed, they were thrown into the crematory -- alive."
Vera Bein escaped that fate. For the longest while, she kept her pregnancy secret, and was lucky her delivery came within weeks of liberation by the Soviets, unannounced, and not "helped" by any camp doctor.
Her survival -- and that of her daughter -- is a footnote of the Holocaust, but an important one.
"This does seem to be an unusual story," said Estee Yaari, foreign media liaison for the Yad Vashem Holocaust museum in Jerusalem. "Although there are others," she said, including one survivor born in Buchenwald in 1944, "it is a rather rare occurrence."
Surviving Auschwitz was one thing. Little "Angi", as her mother called her, was also lucky to have survived the war's chaotic aftermath, overcoming a bad start from poor nutrition that made her bones weak.
She was even lucky to get official proof of her arrival in this world: a birth certificate that her adoptive father got for her before the family left Poland.
Prepared in 1945 in Oswiecim, the Polish name for Auschwitz, the certificate gave her name as "Angela Bein." The surname was that of her biological father, Tibor Bein, a lawyer, who died of maltreatment in the camp.
"Auschwitz" was listed as her place of birth -- a place that has ceased to exist by the German name, except as an expression synonymous with mechanized murder. Auschwitz today exists only as a museum, and Angela Polgar has never been back.
She has a copy of her birth certificate, issued in 1989 by the Communist authorities in her hometown, Sarospatak, in eastern Hungary.
As further proof, she has her original 1966 Hungarian teacher's diploma, which also lists Auschwitz as her birthplace.
After the liberation in 1945, Polgar's mother trekked across parts of Poland, Romania and Byelorussia in a circuitous route leading back to safety in Hungary. There, Vera remarried, and it was that second husband -- Sandor Polgar, also an Auschwitz survivor, owner of a textile shop and a generation older than Vera -- who adopted Polgar and become her "real" father, the only one she ever knew.
Twelve years later, however, he, too, died, and mother and child were once again set adrift. Coming on the heels of the crushing of their country's revolution by the Soviets in 1956, and with a relative now in Canada to sponsor them, they started plotting their flight from Hungary. Vera left in 1966, Angela followed in 1973 with her own daughter, Katy. They settled in Toronto, where Vera worked as a kindergarten teacher and bookkeeper. Katy moved to Montreal and started a family, and in 1996 Vera moved here to be with them.
For the longest time, the family saga -- especially the Auschwitz part -- was kept private. The only public recounting came in the form of a short memoir, written in Angela Polgar's voice by her sister-in-law, a retired Montreal high schoolteacher named Marianne Polgar. It was published in a small Zionist journal in New York in 2000.
Then, last January, after a barrage of coverage in the media about the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, Polgar decided the time had come to let the whole story be told. Polgar also unearthed a precious resource: an old audio tape of her mother recounting her time at Auschwitz. It was an "interview" Vera gave her granddaughter, Katy, in 1984 for a high-school project. The tape -- her final word on the subject -- will soon be registered as part of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Museum's archives in Poland.
As testimonies go, it's a poignant one: words spoken over the telephone more than 25 years ago, a 30-minute inter-generational dialogue in which the subject sounds like she'd rather not be telling the innocent teenager just how horrible history can be.
"It's so painful to talk about this," Vera says at one point, as Katy prods her for details. "I was so curious to hear what she had to say," Katy, now doing her doctorate in cancer research at McGill University, recalled last week.
"My mother was so protective; she wouldn't let me read any Holocaust books, so this was my one-time shot to see what my grandmother could give me. The amazing thing was that she was never bitter about what happened to her. She just went on with life."
On the tape, Vera begins by describing the confusion of her arrival at Auschwitz in May, 1944. She remembers the infamous Dr. Josef Mengele sending her to the left after inspection on the platform while others were sent to the right, to their deaths. Worried she was being separated from the others and unaware of her good fortune to be spared, she remembers telling Mengele she was pregnant, hoping he'd be compassionate and let her stay with the others.
"You stupid goose!" she recalled Mengele snapping at her, ordering her to do as she was told. Healthy and strong, Vera was good stock for the camp's labor force. Mengele wasn't going to send her to her death, not yet.
She was sent to have her left arm tattooed with a registration number: A-6075. Then she was assigned the night shift in the ample storeroom in Camp A that contained mounds of confiscated belongings of other Auschwitz victims and inmates.
Because it was so rich in stock, the depot was dubbed "Kanada," like the land of plenty. Vera's job was to sort clothing, shoes, bedding -- anything the Germans wanted to keep for themselves.
Later, she was assigned kitchen duty, where she ate potato peels, a slight but vital source of nutrition for her and the child inside her. The rest of her daily diet consisted of ersatz coffee in the morning, "something warm, a soup made of grass" for lunch, and for supper a slice of bread with a smear of jam or margarine on it.
Then came hard labour outside the camp, building a road and working in a field. Vera was transferred to Camp B2, then Camp C, where she got to know children, especially twins, who were used for medical experiments by Mengele and fellow doctors before being liquidated.
In October, now seven months pregnant, she was selected by Prof. Carl Clauberg's medical team for sterilization experiments. It was only a matter of time before she became a guinea pig herself.
In October, now seven months pregnant, she was selected by Prof. Carl Clauberg's medical team for sterilization experiments. They injected some kind of burning, caustic substance into her cervix.
Right behind, in the uterus, was the fetus.
"That was me in there," Polgar now marvels. "The needles went in, I went to the right side, then the left side. Who knows what he gave her?"
Somehow the fetus survived. After the experiment was over, the patient went back to her barracks -- and then disappeared from the doctors' radar.
"Somehow Mengele forgot her," Polgar said. "I was so small, the pregnancy didn't really show. That was her luck. Otherwise, they would have finished her off, and me, too."
A month later, Vera was approached in her barracks by "a Jewish woman doctor"-- possibly the gynecologist Gisella Perl.
The doctor had a warning and an offer. She told her that new mothers usually "disappeared" along with their offspring after the birth -- sent to the gas chambers. She offered to give Vera an abortion.
"I promised her to think it over, because she really insisted on it," Vera recalled on the tape. "She said I was too young to be gassed, and she wanted to save me." But that night, Vera dreamt of her mother. "She told me, 'Veruska, you are eight months pregnant, and you don't do this, because (the fetus is) alive already and ready to leave. Believe in God and Hashem will be with you. Maybe a miracle will happen. But don't do it.'
"The next day, Vera gave the doctor her answer: she was going ahead with the birth. It happened on Dec. 21, in the barracks of Camp C. "I felt the pain and told the Block altester (the barrack's inmate supervisor) that I feel cramps and pain. She asked me to climb on the top of the bunk, and she came with me and she helped me to give birth to your mummy," Vera tells her granddaughter on the tape. "She knew how to do it, because she was the daughter of a doctor, so she had an idea about cleanliness and how to help a woman in labor. She brought hot water and clean sheets. She cooked a pair of scissors in hot water to sterilize them" before cutting the umbilical cord, she said. "So everything went quite easily." The infant weighed one kilogram, a little over two pounds "Mummy was so weak and so tiny, she didn't cry. So nobody knew she was born."
Three hours after giving birth, Vera had to leave her baby in the bunk and go outside in the cold for roll call. Three hours after giving birth, Vera had to leave her baby in the bunk and go outside in the cold for roll call -- what the Germans called the Appell.
Her daughter is still amazed she was able to do it. "What courage, what incredible strength she had to do that," Polgar said. "Remember, it was December. It was freezing, and they didn't have any coats or proper shoes, just wooden clogs that made them slip on the ice."
Just before the liberation, a final scare. Yelling "Schnell! Schnell!"(Quick! Quick!) the German guards herded surviving inmates like Vera into a tunnel beneath the camp and told them they would be exterminated. (It didn't happen, but to her dying day Vera retained a mortal fear of tunnels; once, trapped between stations in a stalled Toronto subway car, she lost her senses, screaming to be let out.)
After the scare, there was another miracle.
On the day of liberation another child was born at Auschwitz, Gyorgy Faludi.
His mother had helped Vera with her delivery; now Vera returned the favor.
The woman didn't have enough milk to suckle her son, so Vera did it. It was the beginning of a long friendship. The two families -- Faludi with her son, Bein with her daughter -- stuck together for the next few months of wandering back to Hungary. Vera nursed the two children and helped Faludi find her husband and return to their hometown, Miskolc. The war was over. Now the recovery began. After the liberation, no-one except Vera held up much hope that little Angela would live long.
In Budapest, Vera's mother's advice was to let the baby die. So, too, said the local doctors they consulted -- until one of them did a closer examination."(He) held me up like a chicken, by the legs with my head down. He wanted to see if I'd try to pull my head up. And I did. And then he said 'We can let that baby live.'" Her biggest problem in those first few years were her bones. "They were very weak, and I wasn't allowed to walk. So they put me in a carriage, and my father took me back and forth to school that way," she said.
In the street, strangers used to stare." Everybody looked at me ... and said 'That's a doll, not a baby.' They called my mother the crazy lady, because they thought she was only pretending to have a baby." Over time, though, with better nutrition and care, the child's bones got stronger, and at six she could finally walk unaided. The legacy of Angela's early years never disappeared completely. She's still tiny of stature, under five feet tall, and walks with a shuffling gait. But that doesn't seem to faze her. These days, she bustles back and forth to a computer class she takes in Montreal and doesn't seem handicapped by her physique -- or her past.
Sixty years after her birth she's been thinking a lot about her mother. She remembers her on her death bed, 13 years ago in a Toronto hospital. It was a sad, cruel end to a remarkable life. Vera's body was ridden with cancer of the spine and lung. While she lay dying, paralyzed, she had visions of Auschwitz. "She would say 'Mengele is at the door,' " Polgar said. "It was horrible. There was not enough morphine to take the nightmare away even from her dying minutes."
Vera Polgar, previously Vera Bein, born Veronika Otvos, died at age 73 on Jan. 28, 1992 -- a day after the anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz. "She did not want to die on Jan. 27," Polgar said. "She pulled the suffering through to the next day to die."
She remembers her mother for many things: the odds she overcame, the perseverance she embodied, the pain she concealed for so many years under a mask of optimism and a survivor's dream of renewal.
"She was very charming, never depressed," Polgar said. "But deep down, it was always there."
Like the ink in the number tattooed on her arm, the mark that Auschwitz left on Vera's psyche was indelible. Now, thanks to her daughter, so is her story.
__________________________________________________________________________
http://www.aish.com/ho/p/Murdered_at_Auschwitz.html
Murdered at Auschwitz
My name is Yechiel Michoel Friedman. I was murdered in Auschwitz and don't you ever forget me.
by Benjamin Brafman
This speech was delivered by Benjamin Brafman, Esq. on Yom HaShoah.
I did not survive – I was murdered at Auschwitz.
My name is Yechiel Michoel Friedman. I was "murdered" at Auschwitz. I did not die at Auschwitz. I was "murdered" at Auschwitz.
None of you know me. None of the people in this room have ever met me; not even my own grandson, Ben Brafman, who many of you know, has ever met me. I have authorized my grandson to speak for me tonight, but this is not his speech. It is my speech. My grandson speaks for me, because although I was murdered, I was not silenced. You must be reminded of my life and of my murder - not my death - my murder. The murder of my family - of your family - of so many families...
This is my story - a true story. A sad, horrific story.
My story, like so many of your stories, has a wonderful beginning, a very terrible middle and a tragic, horrible end that Baruch Hashem was not really the end, because although I and part of my family were brutalized and murdered, a part of my family miraculously survived - and because some did survive, my grandson is here to speak for me, to tell you "my" story, his grandfather's story, my life story and my death story. The story of a life that was brutally taken from me, from my beautiful wife, Malka, my beautiful, sweet daughter, Sima, her young, handsome husband, Yaakov and their baby, my granddaughter, my "first" granddaughter, Chaya Sarah, my little Chaya Sarah, who at two years old was ripped screaming from her mother's arms and thrown into an oven at Auschwitz as if she did not matter.
Click here to receive Aish.com's free weekly email.
Well, I speak tonight to tell you that my little Chayala did matter, we all mattered.
Nazi killers murdered my Chayala and 1.5 million other Jewish children.Chaya Sarah was the only grandchild I ever knew and I loved her as only a grandfather can love a grandchild and Nazi killers murdered her, my Chayala and 1.5 million other Jewish children. They took our nachas - our life and our joy and our hope. They took our babies and turned them into ashes.
Today, I speak to you as a neshama, as a soul from heaven, where I and millions of my brothers and sisters sit in a special place of honor reserved for us, for those you call Kedoshim - holy ones - whose lives were taken only because we were Jews, brutally taken less than 70 years ago, when a whole country became dominated by savages, while a civilized world stood by and through its silence, said that it was "okay to smash the head of a two year old child and then, while she was still alive, throw her screaming in terror into a burning oven, that it was okay to gas and cremate - to murder her parents and grandparents." A civilized, cultured nation did this and a civilized world watched it happening and did nothing to stop our slaughter.
The world heard our screams but did not care, the world smelled our burning flesh but turned away - the world heard my Chayala screaming for her mother and did nothing, because Chayala was a Jewish child and at that time - the systematic murder of Jewish children - undertaken in an efficient, organized manner by monsters in government-issued uniforms -was okay. Indeed, it was encouraged, applauded. The murderers were honored with medals, applauded as heroes for killing our children - for killing my grandchild.
How did this happen to us? When did our world turn so bitter and dark?
I remember our life before Auschwitz, a good life, a quiet, pious life, centered around my family, my wife, Malka, our daughters, Sima, Ruchele, Hencha, Hnda, my sweet little boy, Meir, Sima's husband, Yaakov, and their baby, my zeis little Chayala.
We lived in a small town in Czechoslovakia, Kiviash, right near the Hungarian border. I was a learned man, a Hebrew teacher. Our family was a good family. We were poor, but respected. We were honest, kind, sweet people who lived among other respected, soft-spoken, wonderful families. We had no enemies.
I never even raised my voice in anger, never, until that day in Auschwitz, when they murdered my grandchild, then the world heard me, but did not listen, when they tried so hard to destroy my family. I screamed so loud, I cried so hard and long, but the murder continued. The smoke and gas roared and now I am still angry. Now, I raise my voice again, not to complain, but so that you will remember - so that you can wake up, because what happened to my family can happen again, it is happening again!
Today, less than 70 years later, monsters are again threatening and murdering Jewish families, murdering our beautiful children - just last month in Israel, in Itamar, the Fogel family was massacred and again, beautiful, little, innocent children were butchered because they were Jews.
Udi and Ruth Fogel murdered because they were Jews! Their children, Yoav, age 11, Elad, age 4 and Hadas, age 3 months - slaughtered!! Their throats slit while they slept in their own beds.
You must know the terror, not only to make you sad and angry, but to make you vigilant.So I need to tell you about my own murder. I need to relive for you my horror, my terrible loss, so that you will understand and remember, so that you will feel the Shoah - what the world refers to as the Holocaust. It needs to be real for those of you who were not there. It is more than a word - Shoah. You must know the terror, not only to make you sad and angry, but to make you vigilant.
_____If I upset you tonight, good! If my frankness and the terrifying description of brutal murder gives you nightmares tonight - good. I want you to be afraid and sad and angry and bitter and aware - but I also want you to be proud, because the end of my own story, although sad, was not the end.
Be comforted in the knowledge that "they did not win." The Nazi murderers killed me and millions of Jews like me, but they did not win. They did not murder my whole family, or your whole family. The murderers and their army of monsters did not murder the Jewish people, they did not end Klal Yisrael - they made us stronger.
Jews are alive today. Israel is strong today, my family, your families, are here today, and we must keep reminding the world about our parents, grandparents, great grandparents and the children, who were gassed and cremated.
My family is alive today to help you understand the quality of hate that can allow a country to burn and gas and bludgeon newborns, infants and toddlers; to machine gun them and throw them into mass graves or onto trucks and then while still alive, toss them into large ovens, or used while conscious and awake - for vicious, cruel medical experiments.
So many children, small Kinderlach screaming for their Mommy and Tattie, for Bobbie and Zayde - can you hear them? Their screaming is so loud - I can still hear my Chayala, 70 years later. Can you hear them? Can you hear your family members? The families you never got to meet or know. Can you hear their screams?
When you are in bed waiting to fall asleep, listen hard. If you try, you will hear them in your head and in your heart.
Listen and you will also hear 12 year old Tamar Fogel who, returning to her home in Itamar, after an Oneg Shabbat Friday night, only a few weeks ago, found her parents murdered, her three month old baby sister, Hadas, with her throat slit. Can you hear Tamar screaming? All of us, all the way up here in Heaven heard her screams; you should be able to hear her just across the ocean, her screams for her family, for every Jew whose child - whose life has been viciously taken just because they were Jewish.
It is almost impossible to imagine so much murder and torture and starvation, but you must.The difficulty in speaking about such horror and about so much grief is that it is so hard. It is almost impossible for the mind to process so much terrible information, it is almost impossible to make someone understand something so bad, it is hard to even imagine so much murder and torture and starvation, but you must.
I will help you. I am going to be graphic and brutal, because it is the only way to make you get it, for you to really understand what it means when we say Holocaust - or Shoah - or talk about six million Kedoshim.
I am standing in the gas chamber naked with hundreds of innocent Jews. My wife, Malka, whose terrified eyes were already dead, is next door holding our daughter, Sima. Sima's husband, Yaakov, is with me. We have already watched our Chayala cremated. We are already dead - the gas will just kill us again.
We know we are not in a shower. We know we are in a gas chamber. We know we are going to die and we all know that we did nothing wrong and we also know that a civilized world did this to us, that a civilized world abandoned us.
We are afraid to die, of the brutal, choking, burning death that is upon us, but we are so much more afraid that nobody will ever know that we lived, that nobody will ever know that we were a good family; that we had beautiful, good children and that we had a beautiful grandchild. I was so afraid that nobody would ever know; that nobody in my family or in anyone else's family would survive; that the "final solution" was really going to be final. Let me tell you something....
You think you know about prayer - you think you know about faith because you are religious or because you pray every day?
Let me tell you about real prayer, about real belief - in my gas chamber, as gas filled our lungs, as flames burned off our skin, we screamed "Ani Maamin,” we believe in you Hashem.
With our dying breath we screamed, "Shma Yisroel Hashem Elokenu Hashem Echad" - my last words screamed through gas filled lungs, as I died, so afraid that my entire family had been, or soon would be, murdered.
What wrenching sadness, what anger rose in my heart and raged through my mind - I pleaded to Hashem, not to be spared, but for nekama, for revenge! How, when, who would ever make this right, or get even for us, who would be alive to say Kaddish for us - to light a candle on our Yahrzeit - no graves, no headstones - no one alive to mourn our death - to even know of our life.
Well, I am not here tonight in person. Yechiel Michoel Friedman was murdered at Auschwitz, but we were not all murdered that day, or the next day and some of my children, some of your children did survive and today, our children, our grandchildren, our great-grandchildren and now even our great-great-grandchildren are alive. We live in the United States and all over the world as proud Jews, and we have Eretz Yisrael - do you hear that you Nazi murderers? We have Israel, a nation built by survivors. We have a Jewish army and a Jewish state. Our people are strong. We have powerful, eloquent voices demanding to be heard.
My daughters, Hencha and Hinda, who were tortured for years, did not die and my daughter, Ruchele, who at age 15 escaped to America, married Shlomo Brafman, who also escaped - they did not die and their children and my grandchildren and great-grandchildren are growing up as Shomer Shabbos Jews and tonight, my grandson is speaking for me in a shul with 1,000 proud, strong Jews who came to remember all of us tonight.
_____I do not have my life, but I have my revenge.So I do not have my life, but I have my revenge. In fact, my little boy, Meir, who they tried so hard to murder, he lived too. At age 16, he weighed 45 lbs. when found alive in a pile of corpses at Auschwitz.
When liberated, he went to Israel, to Israel, where for 50 years he was a soldier in Tzahal - Israel's army. A Jewish hero, he fought for 50 years in Israel's army. My son, my Kaddish, he did not die in Auschwitz either. How proud I was to watch as he put on the uniform of an Israeli soldier to fight for our country, a Jewish community.
I am very sad and very angry and bitter that I did not get to enjoy the world of nachas that was mine, a world of nachas and pride and Yddishkeit that I had a right to live through and enjoy.
The Nazis hurt me beyond words, but they did not win.
Ladies and gentlemen, they only win if you forget - or now, if you allow the world to deny. They only win if we do not cry real tears when we hear about the slaughter of the Fogel family in Itamar.
They only win if you cannot hear my Chayala screaming or feel the terror of Tamar Fogel, or her grandparents who must now face a quality of grief so savage that it is hard for you to grasp.
Trust me - I know about the murder of a child and a grandchild and how that impacts on everything else. How everything else is forever shrouded in death and overwhelming sadness. The Fogel family will never recover but they cannot be forgotten.
Here we are in a beautiful shul, with so many Jews. Good Jews. Strong, proud people who have not forgotten us, me, my family, your families - the parents, grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, the children, the grandchildren - the babies who were murdered and gassed and buried alive.
It is okay to cry for what we lost, for what was taken from you, for the lives lost, the nachas of family we were deprived of.
Cry for us. We cry for you too, for what you lost, for the family you never met, for the millions of good, sweet Jews who did not live - for the students who never finished their studies, for the scientists and artists and musicians and teachers and Rebbes who never got the chance to excel, to perform, to teach, to cure, to live.
It's okay to cry for the children who never got to play, or sing, or laugh, who were put to death with such violence, with so much hatred that I cannot describe it in words as for certain levels of grief, there are no words. It is so bad that it cannot even be imagined by any decent human being, impossible to process rationally.
But you must, because today, people are already questioning whether the Holocaust really happened. World leaders and scholars are already denying the Holocaust; they are challenging even the integrity of a handful of survivors, the eyewitnesses who are still alive, those who saw the horror with their own eyes. Even these heroic survivors are being doubted and am so afraid that in coming years, vicious, anti-Semitic revisionists will tamper with history and the truth and we cannot - you cannot allow that to happen ever - never...
If our memory is really to be for a blessing, then you must remember.I had a granddaughter, a charming, beautiful little baby girl named Chaya Sarah and she was murdered in front of my eyes and although her neshama, her soul, is in heaven with me, her memory must be emblazoned in your hearts forever.
If our memory is really to be for a blessing, for our neshamos to really have the aliyah you ask for, an aliyah we have earned and paid so dearly for, then you must remember.
You must make certain that your children and their children understand what happened to their family, to your family, to all of our families, or it will happen again.
You think it cannot happen again? Why? Because you have good lives - you live in civilized times? We had a good life - we lived in civilized times. We were happy and complacent, but we were not vigilant and we walked right into a Holocaust.
Our neighbors, an entire nation of ordinary men and women of intelligence and breeding and culture turned into monstrous, murderous animals who withdrew from humanity and imposed a level of brutality on us that cannot now be described and could not then, ever have been predicted - but that is exactly what happened.
It was even worse than the worst true story that any survivor can report, because the brain is not capable of capturing so much grief without exploding, so even those who survived, who saw it all, cannot fully capture the full horrific ordeal, the vicious detail.
Only a victim like me, only someone who did not survive, can tell you the whole, bad, ugly, demented, terrible truth about our murder, of six million murders.
That, my friends, is why I chose to speak to you through my grandson from my seat in heaven and although Hashem does not permit me to tell you "why" these terrible things happened, I am commanded to discuss "what" happened.
To tell you "what" happened with clarity and force, so that hopefully some people in this room will never doubt the Shoah and you will take it upon yourself to confront anyone who dares to deny it and make them hear my story - your story, the sad but true stories of our families, whom we too often refer to as the "Six Million," but rarely if ever refer use their names.
We have names. Our lives were taken, but they cannot take our names.
My name is Yechiel Mechoel Friedman. I was murdered at Auschwitz with my wife, Malka and my daughter, Sima, her husband, Yaakov Weiss and my granddaughter, Chaya Sarah.
Can you see them? I see them and I also see Tamar Fogel and the bodies of her family being carried through Itamar for burial; not 70 years ago - last month. People with names and lives taken in the dark - only because they were Jews.
My name is Yechiel Michoel Friedman. I was murdered in Auschwitz and don't you ever forget me.
________________________________________________________________
http://www.aish.com/ho/p/48948571.html
Sacrifice and Redemption in Auschwitz
No one survived without a miracle.
by Rabbi Yerachmiel Milstein
There's a synagogue near my office where I often "shoe-horn" Mincha (the daily afternoon prayer service) into my usually over-programmed day. During the winter months, when Mincha is prayed in the late afternoon, corralling a quorum of 10 men for services can be quite difficult as most men -- like me -- are still at their places of work, far from the residential neighborhood in which this particular synagogue and my office are located.
Six weeks ago, New York experienced its umpteenth snow storm this year and on this particular day a thin coating of ice was added for good measure. At precisely 15 minutes before sunset I left my office as usual and made my treacherous two-minute foot journey to the synagogue already praying that somehow nine other men would be similarly inspired.
Braving the ice encrusted steps leading down to the shul, I nearly slid into the open door and stumbled into an almost empty room. The rabbi was there and like a telemarketer selling prime property to the unemployed was working the phone trying to coax one or two reticent Jews into braving the elements and joining us. Another gentleman was there, one of the reliable regulars with whom I would occasionally chat as on more than one occasion, we were waiting for the room to fill. He looked at me and commenting about the weather invited me to sit down and get comfortable for the duration.
"You know I never asked you where you're from," I started, "although I'd recognize a Hungarian accent anywhere."
"Budapest," he replied with a sweep of his hand.
"So you must have come over after '56," I said, judging him to be a man of about 60 who like so many Jewish people I knew growing up in New York had made his way to the United States as a child in the aftermath of the Hungarian revolution.
Click here to receive Aish.com's free weekly email.
"No," he smiled, "I got one of these." With that he rolled up his sleeve and showed me a blue-green tattoo with European style numbers. As if to explain my confusion he added kindly, "I'm a little older than I look: already in the 70's."
His young face still gave me pause. "You must've been among the youngest survivors. How did you make it?"
"Only with miracles. Without miracles nobody survived." A man of uncommon good looks, he pointed to the upper bridge of his nose which had the slightest bump and two small scars on either side."I once made the mistake of being too starved and physically exhausted to stand up quickly enough for a vicious SS officer, so he gave me this present at the end of a particularly vicious beating. He stomped on my face with his perfectly shined, cleated boots. It was plain mazal that he only caused cosmetic damage. Had he blinded me I would have been shot dead on the spot, because there was no room in Auschwitz for anybody who couldn't work. No. Nobody survived without miracles."
I marveled at his easy demeanor in speaking about a topic that had silenced most of the Holocaust survivors I knew and I thought this a rare opportunity to learn more about the man and his experiences. "I hope I'm not causing you too much anxiety by dredging up the past, but what other miracles did you experience?"
When we entered the room next to the gas chamber and were asked to undress, it all sank bitterly in. Smiling broadly he said in a mixture of English and Yiddish, "Too much to count. Even the first moment I set foot in the camp, Mengele -- yimach shmo! (may his name be erased!) -- was making his infamous selection of those he deemed healthy enough to work, herding them off to one side. Those who were too young, too weak or too diseased to work were shoved to the other side, to die. Although I was just 14, God put an idea in my head that when that devil asked my age I straightened my shoulders as high as they would go and loudly shouted '16!'. Only later did I learn that this was the exact minimum age of survival."
It was quiet for about a minute as he seemed to lose himself in his thoughts and was all but oblivious to my eager stare.
Speaking more slowly and deliberately than before, he said in a voice barely more than a whisper, "In the end we were skeletons. They starved us and worked us so hard that we were just bones. We couldn't lift. We couldn't run. The most we could do was only shlep ourselves off the floor in the morning. And from working the gas chamber detail my bunkmates and I knew that it was only a matter of days before we would be 'sent to the showers' to be disposed of as well. On the day the Nazis decided to execute us we left the barracks without so much as a whimper. But when we entered the room next to the gas chamber and were asked to undress, it all sank bitterly in. We were a bunch of young men, children really, who were worked to death and when that didn't come soon enough for the Nazis, we had to be grotesquely killed by gas."
Tears welled up in my friend's eyes and began to build in mine as well. "My friends, who seemed lifeless moments before started to scream hysterically and to throw temper tantrums on the floor. Another went insane. But me, I had this feeling that I didn't want to die like that. I thought about my religious training and remembered my beloved Rebbe who had taught me the first letters of the Hebrew alphabet and remained my Rebbe until after my Bar Mitzvah. I wondered what he would have said to me at this moment."
The Zohar records that the recitation of Abraham's and Isaac's readiness to put love of God ahead of life itself is a source of heavenly mercy whenever Jewish lives are threatened. (The Complete Artscroll Siddur)His tears had overrun their banks and were now gracefully gliding down his chiseled cheekbones. "'You are not the worthless scum you are being made to be, but precious Jewish children who are being killed because of their special historic connection to God. This makes you as holy as any sacrifice brought on the altar of the Holy Temple.' I could hear my Rebbe's voice talking to me. 'You are as holy as any human can get. Although Jews do not believe in making human sacrifices, still, God has decided that today you are a human sacrifice.' So I thought, what would be a fitting prayer for a human sacrifice? I called out to anyone who would listen, 'Hey, has anybody got a Siddur (prayer book)?' Oddly enough a tattered book appeared. Sensing the end might be very near, I opened it quickly to the Akeidah, the part of the Torah many recite daily where God commands Abraham to take the life of his son Isaac as a human sacrifice. And with more feeling than ever, I began to recite the last prayer of my short life."
I don't remember at which point the rabbi gave up and got off the phone to become drawn into our conversation. But the rabbi's eyes were as wide as mine as my friend began to recite the words of the Akeidah by heart and with his beautiful voice and melodious Hungarian accent the words became a powerfully moving song.
"And they came to the place of which God had spoken to him, and Abraham built the altar there and arranged the wood, and he bound Isaac his son and placed him on the altar upon the wood. And Abraham stretched forth his hand and took the knife, to slaughter his son. And an angel of God called to him from heaven and said, "Abraham! Abraham!" And he said, "Here I am." And he said, "Do not stretch forth your hand to the lad, nor do the slightest thing to him, for now I know that you are a God fearing man, and you did not withhold your son, your only one, from Me."
Narrowing his eyes to no more than a sliver he said, "As soon as I said these words, a commotion broke out with SS officers rushing into the room yelling, 'Get dressed quickly' and we were ushered out of the room with great haste. They told us the Americans were coming and the Nazi cowards had enough trouble disposing of all the bodies that were already dead. They couldn't afford to create any more bodies and as such we were better off alive to them."
He sighed deeply, "No my friend, without a miracle nobody survived.
_______________________________________________
http://www.aish.com/ho/i/90559064.html
Hitler's Aides
How Christian teachings about Jews helped pave the road to the Holocaust.
by Gabriel Wilensky
How Christian teachings about Jews helped pave the road to the Holocaust.
by Gabriel Wilensky
After celebrating their liberation from the ancient Egyptian yoke, Jews mark Yom HaShoah, Holocaust Remembrance Day. The date was chosen to commemorate the revolt at the Warsaw Ghetto, an event in which a handful of Jews dared confront the all-powerful pharaoh. But the story of our brothers in the ghetto did not have a happy ending; the Red Sea did not open so that the pursued could escape, nor were their enemies smitten by divine hand. Instead, the few survivors from the hell that was the ghetto ended their lives in the vortex of death that was Treblinka.
The Warsaw Ghetto was one of the many ghettos the Germans established in various European cities. The ghettos were created with the sole purpose of keeping the Jewish population locked in to prevent them from having contact with their Christian neighbors. The Germans forced hundreds of hundreds of thousands of Jews to live packed in these places that would have normally held a tenth of the population.
The Jews from the ghetto, as well as those that still lived “free” in other cities, were forced to sew a yellow Star of David on their clothes so that the Christians could clearly identify them. The draconian anti-Jewish laws the Germans promulgated in 1935, followed by similar ones in Italy in 1938 and then in France, Slovakia, Hungary and other countries, prevented the Jews from socializing with Christians, holding public office or academic positions, working in professions such as law or medicine, as well as many other restrictions, including loss of citizenship. These laws constituted grave human rights violations and were the first steps in a gradual process of dehumanization of the Jews that made the subsequent genocide possible.
Where did the Germans get all these ideas? Which Machiavellian functionary thought of this? When the Nazis came to power in 1933 they discovered they did not need to invent almost anything in their persecution of the Jews, because the Catholic Church had invented practically everything hundreds of years before.
When Hitler came to power, he found that the population already deeply hated Jews.The yellow badge in the garments, the prohibition to hold public office, the prohibition to have Christian employees, the burning of the Talmud, the prohibition of living next to Christians, the prohibition from belonging to guilds or work in industry, the ghettos, all these violations to basic human rights of Jews that we associate with the legislation of the Nazi tyranny was promulgated by the Catholic Church between 400 and 700 years before the Nazis. During almost two millennia Christians were taught that Christianity had replaced Judaism, and that Jews were evil, bent on the destruction of Christianity and that they were killers of Jesus.
So we should not be very surprised that when Hitler came to power, he found that the population already deeply hated Jews. That hatred had been planted and cultivated by Christianity since practically the beginning of the Christian movement in the first century of the Common Era. A verbal hatred that began as an intra-Jewish fraternal fight, with time and the distancing of the Early Christians from mainstream Judaism (as Christianity gained traction among the pagan peoples of the Roman Empire) it transformed itself in violent, visceral and irrational hatred.
Click here to receive Aish.com's free weekly email.
The Christian movement accused Jews of killing Jesus and of rejecting his messianic mission. As a consequence, the Early Christians developed the concept of supersessionism in which Judaism was relegated to second plane as Christianity was replacing it. Christians believed at this time that God considered Christians the “New Israel” and the new “Chosen People.” They began calling the Christian Bible the “New” Testament and the Hebrew Bible the “Old” Testament, once again suggesting that the Jewish religion had become superfluous.
Despite oppression and hardship, the Jews did not disappear. This tenaciousness to survive and their continued refusal to accept Jesus as the Messiah led to an increase of Christian hatred toward Jews. The Church Fathers, whose writings make up the foundation of Christianity as we know it today, wrote about Jews in manner comparable to the Nazis. As St. Ambrose, known as the “Bishop with the Golden Tongue” said in 374 CE,
“The Jews are the most worthless of all men. They are lecherous, greedy, rapacious. They are perfidious murderers of Christ. They worship the Devil. Their religion is a sickness. The Jews are the odious assassins of Christ and for killing God there is no expiation possible, no indulgence or pardon. Christians may never cease vengeance, and the Jew must live in servitude forever. God always hated the Jews. It is essential that all Christians hate them.”1
Saint John Chrysostom, bishop of Antioch, was not that much better just a few years later:
“Where Christ-killers gather, the cross is ridiculed, God blasphemed, the father unacknowledged, the son insulted, the grace of the Spirit rejected. . . .If the Jewish rites are holy and venerable, our way of life must be false. But if our way is true, as indeed it is, theirs is fraudulent. I am not speaking of the Scriptures. Far from it!.. I am speaking of their present impiety and madness.”2
During the Middle Ages Christians began associating Jews with the Devil. This association was a natural one to make for a population already used to reading in the Gospels sentences like, “You belong to your father, the devil, and you want to carry out your father’s desire.” Christian thinkers asked themselves what kind of creature would reject the truth and kill God, and concluded that only an inhuman agent of Satan could act that way. The descending spiral led many European Christians, most of whom had never even seen a Jew, to form a fantastic conception of them that had no basis in reality.
The Enlightenment transformed the Christian theological anti-Judaism into something modern, secular and pseudo-scientific.The French Revolution brought about the Emancipation of the Jews, who quickly left the ghettos and in large part assimilated to the Christian population of the cities to which they moved. The Enlightenment transformed the Christian theological anti-Judaism into something modern, secular and pseudo-scientific, sine qua non prerequisites for a population that was rapidly adopting a modern worldview detached from the yoke of their religion. It’s in these cultural surroundings that anti-Semitism was transformed into something racial, and it’s in the 19th and 20th centuries that the old accusations of deicide, of poisoning wells, of bringing about the Black Death, of killing Christian boys to extract their blood to make matzah and many other baseless accusations were transformed into modern accusations in which Jews were blamed for Germany losing WWI, of creating and fomenting revolutions, of modernism, of Capitalism, of Communism, of inflation, of unemployment, and many more.
The Nazis inherited this conception of the Jew. Hitler was raised as a Catholic and imbibed the traditional anti-Jewish teachings in Christianity, and he took maximum advantage of them to promote his agenda. As he told two German Catholic bishops in 1933:
“The Catholic Church considered the Jews pestilent for fifteen hundred years, put them into ghettos, etc., because it recognized the Jews for what they were. . . . I am moving back toward the time in which a fifteen-hundred-year-long tradition was implemented. . . . I recognize the representatives of this race as pestilent for the state and for the church and perhaps I am thereby doing Christianity a great service for pushing them out of schools and public functions.”3
***
A Note from the Author: Antisemitism in Christianity and its role in the Holocaust
Thank you all for your comments. One important point to keep in mind is that this article does not describe modern Christians or Christianity. The focus of the article (and the book) is on the history of Christianity leading up to the Holocaust, particularly as it was in Europe. The Catholic Church convened the Second Vatican Council in the 1960s and among other things officially lifted the Christian accusation of deicide. But for those Christian readers who were raised after 1965, you should know that prior to that Christianity taught that Jews were Christ-killers, and that all the Jews of Jesus’ time, and for all time, were guilty of his death: ‘Let his blood be on us and on our children!’ (Matthew 27: 24-25). This brought untold misery on Jews during centuries of persecution. Christians were incensed by passion plays and Good Friday liturgy and went out on murderous rampages. The negative teachings about Jews were pervasive, starting with the New Testament (just the four Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles contain 450 antisemitic verses, an average of two per page!) and including the writings of the Church Fathers, Martin Luther and other Christian thinkers and theologians. Priests everywhere in Europe routinely disparaged the Jews through the centuries in their sermons, even during the Nazi era.
In other words, there’s a sad history wich runs deep and for a long time. Many of the perpetrators of the Holocaust saw first hand, or heard from their parents or grandparents about the ghettos the Church had instituted not in the name of Hitler but in the name of Jesus. Think about it: the walls of the Roman ghetto, literally across the Tiber from the Vatican, were destroyed for the last time in 1870!
Most Christians today do not harbor this hatred toward Jews. Many Christians helped Jews during WWII, but as good as that was, unfortunately it was a tiny drop in a giant ocean of violence toward Jews from other Christians. Many Christians today, particularly in the US, are friends of the Jews and of Israel. This is a good thing. It is my hope that through healthy discussion like this one, and through education about history as I tried to convey in my book Six Million Crucifixions, further links will be forged, and pre-existing ones will be strenghtened. Even with the great progress of Vatican II and its subsequent teachings, there’s still work to do to completely eliminate antisemitism from Christianity.
Based on the author's book, “Six Million Crucifixions: How Christian Teachings About Jews Paved the Road to the Holocaust”.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1.Quoted in Dagobert David Runes, The Jew and the Cross, p. 61.
2.Quoted in Jeremy Cohen, “Robert Chazan’s ‘Medieval Anti-Semitism’: A Note on the Impact of Theology,” in Berger, ed., History and Hate, p.69.
3.Akten deutscher Bischöfe, vol. 1, pp. 100-102. Quoted in Saul Friedländer, Nazi Germany and the Jews, p. 47.
Friday, May 11, 2012
Ethics of the Fathers: Chapter Four
Ethics of the Fathers: Chapter Four
1. Ben Zoma would say: Who is wise? One who learns from every man. As is stated (Psalms 119:99): "From all my teachers I have grown wise, for Your testimonials are my meditation."
Who is strong? One who overpowers his inclinations. As is stated (Proverbs 16:32), "Better one who is slow to anger than one with might, one who rules his spirit than the captor of a city."
Who is rich? One who is satisfied with his lot. As is stated (Psalms 128:2): "If you eat of toil of your hands, fortunate are you, and good is to you"; "fortunate are you" in this world, "and good is to you" in the World to Come.
Who is honorable? One who honors his fellows. As is stated (I Samuel 2:30): "For to those who honor me, I accord honor; those who scorn me shall be demeaned."
2. Ben Azzai would say: Run to pursue a minor mitzvah, and flee from a transgression. For a mitzvah brings another mitzvah, and a transgression brings another transgression. For the reward of a mitzvah is a mitzvah, and the reward of transgression is transgression.
3. He would also say: Do not scorn any man, and do not discount any thing. For there is no man who has not his hour, and no thing that has not its place.
4. Rabbi Levitas of Yavneh would say: Be very, very humble, for the hope of mortal man is worms.
Rabbi Yochanan the son of Berokah would say: Whoever desecrates the Divine Name covertly, is punished in public. Regarding the desecration of the Name, the malicious and the merely negligent are one and the same.
5. Rabbi Ishmael the son of Rabbi Yossei would say: One who learns Torah in order to teach, is given the opportunity to learn and teach. One who learns in order to do, is given the opportunity to learn, teach, observe and do.
Rabbi Tzaddok would say: Do not separate yourself from the community. Do not act as a counselor-at-law (when serving as a judge). Do not make the Torah a crown to magnify yourself with, or a spade with which to dig. So would Hillel say: one who make personal use of the crown of Torah shall perish. Hence, one who benefits himself from the words of Torah, removes his life from the world.
6. Rabbi Yossei would say: Whoever honors the Torah, is himself honored by the people; whoever degrades the Torah, is himself degraded by the people.
7. His son, Rabbi Ishmael would say: One who refrains from serving as a judge avoids hatred, thievery and false oaths. One who frivolously hands down rulings is a fool, wicked and arrogant.
8. He would also say: Do not judge on your own, for there is none qualified to judge alone, only the One. And do not say, "You must accept my view," for this is their [the majority's] right, not yours.
9. Rabbi Jonathan would say: Whoever fulfills the Torah in poverty, will ultimately fulfill it in wealth; and whoever neglects the Torah in wealth, will ultimately neglect it in poverty.
10. Rabbi Meir would say: Engage minimally in business, and occupy yourself with Torah. Be humble before every man. If you neglect the Torah, there will be many more causes for neglect before you; if you toil much in Torah, there is much reward to give to you.
11. Rabbi Eliezer the son of Yaakov would say: He who fulfills one mitzvah, acquires for himself one angel-advocate; he who commits one transgression, acquires against himself one angel-accuser. Repentance and good deeds are as a shield against retribution.
Rabbi Yochanan the Sandal-Maker would say: Every gathering that is for the sake of Heaven, will endure; that is not for the sake of Heaven, will not endure.
12. Rabbi Eliezer the son of Shamua would say: The dignity of your student should be as precious to you as your own; the dignity of your colleague, as your awe of your master; and your awe of your master as your awe of Heaven.
13. Rabbi Judah would say: Be careful with your studies, for an error of learning is tantamount to a willful transgression.
Rabbi Shimon would say: There are three crowns--the crown of Torah, the crown of priesthood and the crown of sovereignty--but the crown of good name surmounts them all.
14. Rabbi Nehora'i would say: Exile yourself to a place of Torah; do not say that it will come after you, that your colleagues will help you retain it. Rely not on your own understanding.
15. Rabbi Yannai would say: We have no comprehension of the tranquility of the wicked, nor of the suffering of the righteous.
Rabbi Matya the son of Charash would say: Be first to greet every man. Be a tail to lions, rather than a head to foxes.
16. Rabbi Yaakov would say: This world is comparable to the antechamber before the World to Come. Prepare yourself in the antechamber, so that you may enter the banquet hall.
17. He would also say: A single moment of repentance and good deeds in this world is greater than all of the World to Come. And a single moment of bliss in the World to Come is greater than all of the present world.
18. Rabbi Shimon the son of Elazar would say: Do not appease your friend at the height of his anger; do not comfort him while his dead still lies before him; do not ask him about his vow the moment he makes it; and do not endeavor to see him at the time of his degradation.
19. Samuel the Small would say: "When your enemy falls, do not rejoice; when he stumbles, let your heart not be gladdened. Lest G-d see, and it will displeasing in His eyes, and He will turn His wrath from him [to you]" (Proverbs 24:17-18).
20. Elisha the son of Avuyah would say: One who learns Torah in his childhood, what is this comparable to? To ink inscribed on fresh paper. One who learns Torah in his old age, what is this comparable to? To ink inscribed on erased paper.
Rabbi Yossei the son of Judah of Kfar HaBavli would say: One who learns Torah from youngsters, whom is he comparable to? To one who eats unripe grapes and drinks [unfermented] wine from the press. One who learns Torah from the old, whom is he comparable to? To one who eats ripened grapes and drinks aged wine.
Said Rabbi Meir: Look not at the vessel, but at what it contains. There are new vessels that are filled with old wine, and old vessels that do not even contain new wine.
21. Rabbi Elazar HaKapor would say: Envy, lust and honor drive a man from the world.
22. He would also say: Those who are born will die, and the dead will live. The living will be judged, to learn, to teach and to comprehend that He is G-d, He is the former, He is the creator, He is the comprehender, He is the judge, He is the witness, He is the plaintiff, and He will judge. Blessed is He, for before Him there is no wrong, no forgetting, no favoritism, and no taking of bribes; know, that everything is according to the reckoning. Let not your heart convince you that the grave is your escape; for against your will you are formed, against your will you are born, against your will you live, against your will you die, and against your will you are destined to give a judgement and accounting before the king, king of all kings, the Holy One, blessed be He.
Thursday, May 10, 2012
The text of Aratus poem Phainomena
http://archive.org/details/phainomenaorhea00aratgoog
THE RIGHT HONOURABLK WILLIAM EWART GLADSTONE, M.P. WHO, AMID THE MO.^T ARDUOUS PUBLIC LABOURS, HAS NEVER CEASED TO FIND REFRESHMENT IX THE STUDY OF ARCHAIC TIMF^. PREFACE. In the present work I place before the reader in an English form, the famoufi Poem of Aratos which has supplied our modem world with the now familiar ancient constellations. The Phainomena was one of the most popular productions of antiquity, and its theme is replete with a many-sided interest—astronomical, historical, mythological, and psychological. On Hellenic astronomy generally I have touched only slightly, for reasons mentioned in the foUowing pages ; and the work purports far more to indicate than to exhaust the numerous lines of thought and branches of investigation which are connected with stellar research generally and with the Phainomena in particular. The statements of Aratos are frequently very incorrectly quoted, and it seemed desirable, in the first place, to place them plainly on record, and to accompany them with a short Introduction and some brief illustrative notes.
One of the chief points of interest in the enquiry is the connexion, ever becoming clearer, between Hellenic and Euphratean astronomy, a subject necessarily almost entirely unknown to earlier writers. This work is also in strict continuation of my former studies on The Sun {The Great Vionysiak Myth), The Moon ( The Unicom, and The Myth of Kirke\ and The Stars [The Law of Kosmic Order, and Eridanus: River and Constellation), The same system, mythological and general, which I have supported and illustrated in former monographs reappears in these pages. It does not pretend a to resolve all archaic stories into accounts of natural plienomena ; but it fully recognizes the immense influence which natural phenoinena, and anthropomorphic and other analogies drawn from the animal kingdom, exercised upon the mind of early man.
Aratos, upon whom the composition of the Diosemeia, and the versification of the Phainomena of the astronomer Eudoxos, who lived cir. B.C. 403-350, have conferred immortality,^ was a native of Soloi, in Kilikia; and therefore, as has frequently been noticed, a fellow-coimtryinan of S. Paul, who shows evident familiarity with his principal poem. This work was undertaken at the request of Antigonos Gonatas, King of Makedonia, whose reign extended from B.C. 277 to 239, and at whose court Aratos lived and died. The composition of the Phainomena is generally placed cir. B.C. 270, and few works have been more popular. Numbers of commentators, at the head of whom stands Hipparchos, have exercised their learning and ingenuity upon it; whilst Cicero * and Grerman-icus ^ turned it into Latin verse. With the former it was evidently an especial favourite, and he remarks : ' Constat inter doctos hominem ignarum astrologiae^ Aratum, omatissimis atque optimis versibus de coelo stellisque dixisse.' * That Aratos was personally innocent of any scientific astronomical knowledge all the world has always agreed with Cicero ; and it is questionable whether even Eudoxos himself was so very greatly the poet's superior in this respect. But, notwithstanding, the Phainomena is of the highest interest, not only because it is the foundation of all the uranographic maps and lists now used by modem science, but also because it contains most valuable reminiscences of earlier stages sidereal observation and mythologico-religious belief in Western Asia. This phase of the enquiry I do not propose to consider exhaustively here, inasmuch as I have already treated of it elsewhere ; ^ and I now merely place before the English reader a faithful translation of the poem, as distinguished from a loose and inaccurate paraphrase. It is equally be)''ond my present purpose to enter into any detailed account of the rise and progress of early Hellenic astronomy; especially since this field has already been ably explored by Delambre, Sir G. C. Lewis, and others.
Cicero in an interesting passage, states that * Gallus assured us [that the] solid and compact [model] globe was a very ancient invention, and that the first [Hellenic] model had been originally made by Thales of Miletus,' cir. B.C. 636-546, renowned, amongst other things, for having fallen into a well whilst stargazing.*^ ' That afterwards Eudoxus of Cnidus, a disciple of Plato, had traced on its surface the stars that appear in the sky, and that many years subsequently, borrowing from Eudoxus this beautiful design and representation, Aratos had illustrated it in his not by any science of astronomy, but by the ornament of poetic description.'^ Anaximandros of Miletos, B.C. 610-547, the immediate philosophical successor of Thales, according to Diogenes Laertios, * was the first discoverer of the gnomon ; and he placed some in Lakedaimftn on the sun-dials there, and they showed the solstices and the equinoxes. He was the first person, too, who drew a map of the earth and sea, and he also made a globe.' * In statements of this kind by classical writers the introducer or the popularizer is constantly described as the inventor. Thus, in the present instance, Anaximandros was not ^ the first discoverer' of the gnomon ; for, as Herodotos truly says, * the gnomon with the division of the day into twelve parts, was received by the Greeks from the Babylonians.' ^ But the point to be here noticed is, that the Asiatic Hellenes had long been familiar with maps and other representations uranographic ^ and geographic.Thus, Herodotos saw and derided ^ numbers of the ethereal circle; Uelios driving his horses down the west, drawing Hesperos with him; black-robed Night in a two-horsed chariot, the Stars following her; the Pleiad in mid ether; * sword-bearing Orion' (vide p. 88) ; above, Arktos twisting around the pole ; the Full-moon, the month-divider; the Ilvades, the surest sign for sailors ; and, lastly, light-bearing star-chasing Eos (Ion, 1140-68. As to the Hellenic view of thekosmic and stellar dance, vide O, D, At, i. 106 et eeq,).
persons drawing maps of the world'; ^ and states that Aristagoras of Miletos, which city, it shoiild be noticed, was the abode of the sages above mentioned, cir. B.C. 500, produced to Kleomenes of Sparta * a bronze tablet, whereupon the whole circuit of the earth was engraved, with all its seas and rivers.' *^ This tablet was ^pinax, a term meaning (1) a board ; (2) a plate or wooden trencher ; (3) a plate with anything drawn or engraved on it (=a map) ; and (4) the plate etc. on which in later times astrological schemes were erected, so that 17 irepl irivaKa Ii€0o8os means * the art of casting nativities.'
That is to say, the scheme of constellation-figures was already archaic in his time ; and statements such as that Oinopides of Chios, a sage of uncertain date, * discovered' the Zodiac, are about as valuable as an assertion that * Homer' discovered the Great Bear. As to the Zodiac, Pliny gravely informs us that * Signa in eo Cleostratus [who * lived some time between B.C. 548 and 432 '] et prima Arietis ac Sagittarii.'' He might as well have stated that So-and-So put the letters in the alphabet. A far more important assertion, when rightly understood, and one which was literally received by Sir Isaac Newton, is made by Clement of Alexandria, who says, * Hermippus of Berytus [cir. a.d. 100] calls Cheiron the Centaur wise ; about whom, he that wrote 2he Battle of the Titans [probably either Arktinos, cir. B.C. 776, or Eumelos of Korinth, cir. B.C. 760] says, " that he first led the race of mortals to righteousness, by teaching them the solemnity of the oath, and propitiatory sacrifices and the figures of Olympus " ' * (o7(i7/iaT 'OXv/xTTov^). Thus Eudoxos summarized the astronomical observations
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 446-454).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 434-442).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 426-427).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 420-426).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 416-420).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 412-415).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 396-406).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 212-223).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Location 212).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 199-211).
Calm may she glide. A further taJe obtains,— lOO That once she was a denizen of earth, Met mortals face to face, and ne'er disowned Or men or women of the race of old. But though immortal sat amid them all. They used to name her Justice ; she would call 105 The elders to broad street or city-square, Declare men's rights, and see that right was done. As yet they knew not aught of grievous strife. Nor aught of blameful faction, or of din ; But thus they lived. Nor recked of ocean-toil, iio For life ^ not yet did vessels bring afar ; But ploughs and oxen, and the people's queen Justice, right-giver, richly all things gave. This was whilst earth maintained the golden race.'^
Calm may she glide. A further taJe obtains,— lOO That once she was a denizen of earth, Met mortals face to face, and ne'er disowned Or men or women of the race of old. But though immortal sat amid them all. They used to name her Justice ; she would call 105 The elders to broad street or city-square, Declare men's rights, and see that right was done. As yet they knew not aught of grievous strife. Nor aught of blameful faction, or of din ; But thus they lived. Nor recked of ocean-toil, iio For life ^ not yet did vessels bring afar ; But ploughs and oxen, and the people's queen Justice, right-giver, richly all things gave. This was whilst earth maintained the golden race.'^
Justice, hating such a race as these, Soared up to heaven, selecting this abode, Whence yet at night she shows herself to men The Virgin, near the Ploughman seen afar.^ O'er both her shoulders there revolves a star [in the right wing, Fruit-plucking-hetaid called,] * So large in size, and having such a gleam ' As to show forth beneath the Great Beards ttul.* For that is bright, and bright the neighbouring stars ; When you see these you have no need to doubt.*
THE HEAVENLY DISPLAV. All his huge form towards the left of the Twins Inclining, you will find : the TwistcJ-'s head Revolves just opposite. On his left shoulder The sacred Goat ^ which men say offered Zeus its dug ; Zeus' servants * call it the Olenian ^ Goat. She is both large and bright; but they—the Kids — Shine somewhat feebly on the wrist of the hand * The horned ^ Bull fallen near the Driver's * feet Fig, XI.— The CiiAKioTiiBB. Behold. And very like him lie the stars ; TIius is his head distinguished ; other mark Is needless to discern the head, since stars On both sides shape it as they roll along.'
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 153-160).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 117-121).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 81-95).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 81-95).
The text of Aratus poem Phainomena note the article by Dr Riemer Faber
The text of Aratus poemOntario, Canada
THE RIGHT HONOURABLK WILLIAM EWART GLADSTONE, M.P. WHO, AMID THE MO.^T ARDUOUS PUBLIC LABOURS, HAS NEVER CEASED TO FIND REFRESHMENT IX THE STUDY OF ARCHAIC TIMF^. PREFACE. In the present work I place before the reader in an English form, the famoufi Poem of Aratos which has supplied our modem world with the now familiar ancient constellations. The Phainomena was one of the most popular productions of antiquity, and its theme is replete with a many-sided interest—astronomical, historical, mythological, and psychological. On Hellenic astronomy generally I have touched only slightly, for reasons mentioned in the foUowing pages ; and the work purports far more to indicate than to exhaust the numerous lines of thought and branches of investigation which are connected with stellar research generally and with the Phainomena in particular. The statements of Aratos are frequently very incorrectly quoted, and it seemed desirable, in the first place, to place them plainly on record, and to accompany them with a short Introduction and some brief illustrative notes.
One of the chief points of interest in the enquiry is the connexion, ever becoming clearer, between Hellenic and Euphratean astronomy, a subject necessarily almost entirely unknown to earlier writers. This work is also in strict continuation of my former studies on The Sun {The Great Vionysiak Myth), The Moon ( The Unicom, and The Myth of Kirke\ and The Stars [The Law of Kosmic Order, and Eridanus: River and Constellation), The same system, mythological and general, which I have supported and illustrated in former monographs reappears in these pages. It does not pretend a to resolve all archaic stories into accounts of natural plienomena ; but it fully recognizes the immense influence which natural phenoinena, and anthropomorphic and other analogies drawn from the animal kingdom, exercised upon the mind of early man.
Aratos, upon whom the composition of the Diosemeia, and the versification of the Phainomena of the astronomer Eudoxos, who lived cir. B.C. 403-350, have conferred immortality,^ was a native of Soloi, in Kilikia; and therefore, as has frequently been noticed, a fellow-coimtryinan of S. Paul, who shows evident familiarity with his principal poem. This work was undertaken at the request of Antigonos Gonatas, King of Makedonia, whose reign extended from B.C. 277 to 239, and at whose court Aratos lived and died. The composition of the Phainomena is generally placed cir. B.C. 270, and few works have been more popular. Numbers of commentators, at the head of whom stands Hipparchos, have exercised their learning and ingenuity upon it; whilst Cicero * and Grerman-icus ^ turned it into Latin verse. With the former it was evidently an especial favourite, and he remarks : ' Constat inter doctos hominem ignarum astrologiae^ Aratum, omatissimis atque optimis versibus de coelo stellisque dixisse.' * That Aratos was personally innocent of any scientific astronomical knowledge all the world has always agreed with Cicero ; and it is questionable whether even Eudoxos himself was so very greatly the poet's superior in this respect. But, notwithstanding, the Phainomena is of the highest interest, not only because it is the foundation of all the uranographic maps and lists now used by modem science, but also because it contains most valuable reminiscences of earlier stages sidereal observation and mythologico-religious belief in Western Asia. This phase of the enquiry I do not propose to consider exhaustively here, inasmuch as I have already treated of it elsewhere ; ^ and I now merely place before the English reader a faithful translation of the poem, as distinguished from a loose and inaccurate paraphrase. It is equally be)''ond my present purpose to enter into any detailed account of the rise and progress of early Hellenic astronomy; especially since this field has already been ably explored by Delambre, Sir G. C. Lewis, and others.
Cicero in an interesting passage, states that * Gallus assured us [that the] solid and compact [model] globe was a very ancient invention, and that the first [Hellenic] model had been originally made by Thales of Miletus,' cir. B.C. 636-546, renowned, amongst other things, for having fallen into a well whilst stargazing.*^ ' That afterwards Eudoxus of Cnidus, a disciple of Plato, had traced on its surface the stars that appear in the sky, and that many years subsequently, borrowing from Eudoxus this beautiful design and representation, Aratos had illustrated it in his not by any science of astronomy, but by the ornament of poetic description.'^ Anaximandros of Miletos, B.C. 610-547, the immediate philosophical successor of Thales, according to Diogenes Laertios, * was the first discoverer of the gnomon ; and he placed some in Lakedaimftn on the sun-dials there, and they showed the solstices and the equinoxes. He was the first person, too, who drew a map of the earth and sea, and he also made a globe.' * In statements of this kind by classical writers the introducer or the popularizer is constantly described as the inventor. Thus, in the present instance, Anaximandros was not ^ the first discoverer' of the gnomon ; for, as Herodotos truly says, * the gnomon with the division of the day into twelve parts, was received by the Greeks from the Babylonians.' ^ But the point to be here noticed is, that the Asiatic Hellenes had long been familiar with maps and other representations uranographic ^ and geographic.Thus, Herodotos saw and derided ^ numbers of the ethereal circle; Uelios driving his horses down the west, drawing Hesperos with him; black-robed Night in a two-horsed chariot, the Stars following her; the Pleiad in mid ether; * sword-bearing Orion' (vide p. 88) ; above, Arktos twisting around the pole ; the Full-moon, the month-divider; the Ilvades, the surest sign for sailors ; and, lastly, light-bearing star-chasing Eos (Ion, 1140-68. As to the Hellenic view of thekosmic and stellar dance, vide O, D, At, i. 106 et eeq,).
persons drawing maps of the world'; ^ and states that Aristagoras of Miletos, which city, it shoiild be noticed, was the abode of the sages above mentioned, cir. B.C. 500, produced to Kleomenes of Sparta * a bronze tablet, whereupon the whole circuit of the earth was engraved, with all its seas and rivers.' *^ This tablet was ^pinax, a term meaning (1) a board ; (2) a plate or wooden trencher ; (3) a plate with anything drawn or engraved on it (=a map) ; and (4) the plate etc. on which in later times astrological schemes were erected, so that 17 irepl irivaKa Ii€0o8os means * the art of casting nativities.'
That is to say, the scheme of constellation-figures was already archaic in his time ; and statements such as that Oinopides of Chios, a sage of uncertain date, * discovered' the Zodiac, are about as valuable as an assertion that * Homer' discovered the Great Bear. As to the Zodiac, Pliny gravely informs us that * Signa in eo Cleostratus [who * lived some time between B.C. 548 and 432 '] et prima Arietis ac Sagittarii.'' He might as well have stated that So-and-So put the letters in the alphabet. A far more important assertion, when rightly understood, and one which was literally received by Sir Isaac Newton, is made by Clement of Alexandria, who says, * Hermippus of Berytus [cir. a.d. 100] calls Cheiron the Centaur wise ; about whom, he that wrote 2he Battle of the Titans [probably either Arktinos, cir. B.C. 776, or Eumelos of Korinth, cir. B.C. 760] says, " that he first led the race of mortals to righteousness, by teaching them the solemnity of the oath, and propitiatory sacrifices and the figures of Olympus " ' * (o7(i7/iaT 'OXv/xTTov^). Thus Eudoxos summarized the astronomical observations
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 446-454).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 434-442).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 426-427).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 420-426).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 416-420).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 412-415).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 396-406).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 212-223).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Location 212).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 199-211).
Calm may she glide. A further taJe obtains,— lOO That once she was a denizen of earth, Met mortals face to face, and ne'er disowned Or men or women of the race of old. But though immortal sat amid them all. They used to name her Justice ; she would call 105 The elders to broad street or city-square, Declare men's rights, and see that right was done. As yet they knew not aught of grievous strife. Nor aught of blameful faction, or of din ; But thus they lived. Nor recked of ocean-toil, iio For life ^ not yet did vessels bring afar ; But ploughs and oxen, and the people's queen Justice, right-giver, richly all things gave. This was whilst earth maintained the golden race.'^
Calm may she glide. A further taJe obtains,— lOO That once she was a denizen of earth, Met mortals face to face, and ne'er disowned Or men or women of the race of old. But though immortal sat amid them all. They used to name her Justice ; she would call 105 The elders to broad street or city-square, Declare men's rights, and see that right was done. As yet they knew not aught of grievous strife. Nor aught of blameful faction, or of din ; But thus they lived. Nor recked of ocean-toil, iio For life ^ not yet did vessels bring afar ; But ploughs and oxen, and the people's queen Justice, right-giver, richly all things gave. This was whilst earth maintained the golden race.'^
Justice, hating such a race as these, Soared up to heaven, selecting this abode, Whence yet at night she shows herself to men The Virgin, near the Ploughman seen afar.^ O'er both her shoulders there revolves a star [in the right wing, Fruit-plucking-hetaid called,] * So large in size, and having such a gleam ' As to show forth beneath the Great Beards ttul.* For that is bright, and bright the neighbouring stars ; When you see these you have no need to doubt.*
THE HEAVENLY DISPLAV. All his huge form towards the left of the Twins Inclining, you will find : the TwistcJ-'s head Revolves just opposite. On his left shoulder The sacred Goat ^ which men say offered Zeus its dug ; Zeus' servants * call it the Olenian ^ Goat. She is both large and bright; but they—the Kids — Shine somewhat feebly on the wrist of the hand * The horned ^ Bull fallen near the Driver's * feet Fig, XI.— The CiiAKioTiiBB. Behold. And very like him lie the stars ; TIius is his head distinguished ; other mark Is needless to discern the head, since stars On both sides shape it as they roll along.'
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 153-160).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 117-121).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 81-95).
Aratus. The Phainomena, or 'Heavenly displays' of Aratus, done into Engl. verse by R. Brown (Kindle Locations 81-95).
The text of Aratus poem Phainomena note the article by Dr Riemer Faber
The text of Aratus poemOntario, Canada
Transcendence and Immanence
Transcendence and Immanence
http://sn111w.snt111.mail.live.com/default.aspx#!/mail/InboxLight.aspx?n=325920862!n=1936041193&fid=1&fav=1&mid=ddce8867-89f9-11e1-a4ae-00237de4a7e6&fv=1
Shemini; Leviticus 9:1-11:47
Print this Page
By Eli Touger
Adapted from
Likkutei Sichos, Vol. III, p. 973ff;
Vol. XVII, p. 92ff;
Sefer HaSichos 5749, p. 475ff
Learning What It Means To Count
In Jewish thought, numbers represent not only concepts in our material world, but spiritual forces which mold our reality.1 Seven is a fundamental number, representative of the seven Divine middos, the attributes which are the source for and which parallel our emotions. These middos comprise the active force which brings our material world into being.2 For this reason, time is structured in cycles of seven. There are seven days in the week, seven years in the Shemittah cycle,3 and our Sages speak4 of seven millennia as the span of the world's existence.
Shabbos, the seventh day, reflects perfection within the natural order. Just as the original Shabbos brought Creation to a close, on Shabbos a person should feel that "all his work is completed."5 Moreover, Shabbos does not symbolize only material perfection; referring to it as Shabbos Kodesh, " the holy Sabbath," indicates that the G-dly light enclothed within the world is manifest at that time.
The number eight, however, refers to an even higher level of holiness the G-dly light which transcends the limits of our world. Indeed, it eclipses the number seven to the extent that our Rabbis state6 that "the number seven is always mundane, while the number eight is holy."
"The Eighth Day"
These concepts are reflected in this week's Torah reading, Parshas Shemini. Shemini means "the eighth." It refers to the first of Nissan, the day on which the Sanctuary was established. It is called "the eighth day"7 because it was preceded by seven days of dedication, during which Moshe erected and took down the Sanctuary each day, and taught Aharon and his sons the order of sacrificial worship.
The Kli Yakar asks why the Torah employs the term, "the eighth day." For this day is not one of the seven days of dedication, and indeed represents a totally different plane. For it was on this day that G-d's presence manifested itself in the Sanctuary: "G-d's glory was revealed to the people and a fire came forth from before G-d."8
In resolution, he explains that the day is associated with this number to highlight its uniqueness. For the number eight is "set aside for G-d," representing a transcendence of the world's natural limits.
But this resolution is itself problematic. Since the number eight reflects such a high level, how can it be associated with the seven days that precede it? Calling it "the eighth day" implies the continuation of a sequence. Thus the very term used to accentuate the day's uniqueness points to its connection with the previous days.
Earning More Than We Can
The above difficulty can be resolved on the basis of a ruling with regard to monetary law:9 Giving a present is equated with a sale, because if the recipient had not generated satisfaction for the giver, he would not have granted him the gift.
Similarly with the concepts mentioned previously: the manifestation of G-d's presence cannot be drawn down by man's service, for it is a transcendent light. Instead, it must be granted as a gift from above. Nevertheless, when does G-d endow us with such a revelation? When we have created a fit setting for it when we have refined and developed our environment and ourselves to the limit of our abilities.
Thus the seven days of dedication represented man's efforts to refine our environment an objective within man's capacity. And by carrying out this objective, a setting is created for the revelations of the eighth day, the transcendent light.10
Focus on This World, Not on the Next
Moreover, when this transcendent revelation is brought about by man's Divine service, it does not remain an isolated occurrence, but permeates our environment, showing the immanence of infinite spirituality.
This concept is underscored by the continuation of the Torah reading,11 which speaks of the death of Aharon's sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah relates12 that they brought an unauthorized incense offering and as a result, "Fire came forth from G-d and consumed them."
Many explanations are offered as to why the brothers were punished by death.13 From a mystical perspective, it is said14 that they died because their souls soared to such heights that they could no longer remain in their bodies. Nevertheless, their conduct is judged unfavorably because their spiritual quest ran contrary to G-d's intent in creation: the establishment of a dwelling for Himself amidst the day-to-day realities of our existence.15 Their deaths show that our spiritual quest should not be directed towards the attainment of lofty rapture, but instead should remain firmly grounded in our actual lives.
This theme is also reflected in the conclusion of the Torah reading, which focuses on kosher food. For the establishment of a dietary code indicates that Judaism's conception of Divine service involves living within the world.
A Fusion of Opposites
This fusion of transcendence and immanence is also alluded to by the name Shemini. Shemini shares a root with the Hebrew word shemen, meaning "oil." Oil has two tendencies.16 On one hand, it floats above other liquids, to the extent that if an impure person touches oil floating on another liquid, the lower liquid is not rendered impure, for the two are not considered to be joined.17
On the other hand, oil permeates the entities on which it is placed. Therefore, if a non-kosher substance which is fat or oily is roasted together with other food, it makes the entire quantity of food non-kosher, although ordinarily only the food actually touching the non-kosher substance would be tainted.18
Similarly, with regard to the subject at hand, the essential light associated with the eighth day transcends the limits of our material realm. Nevertheless, G-d's intent is not that this light remain in a sublime state, but that it permeate the material world, endowing it with holiness.
New Doors of Perception
The number eight shares a connection to the Era of the Redemption, as our Sages state:19 "The harp of the Era of the Redemption will be of eight strands" (while the harp used in the Beis HaMikdash had seven strands).
The revelations of the Era of the Redemption will also follow the motif described above. Thus in describing those revelations, our prophets say:20 "And the glory of G-d will be revealed and all flesh will see." "The glory of G-d" refers to a spiritual peak21 above the natural order. This level will be "seen," perceived openly, by "all flesh"; mortals within our material world will realize this spiritual truth.
Moreover, these revelations will be an intrinsic part of that era. Just as today it is natural for our eyes to see material objects, in that era, all flesh will perceive the glory of G-d. This involves a remaking of the natural order through our Divine service. For as stated in Tanya,22 the revelations of the Era of the Redemption depend on our service during the time of exile.
To refer to concepts mentioned previously: seven prepares for eight. By refining and elevating ourselves and our environment in the present age, we precipitate the transcendent revelations of the Era of the Redemption. Our Divine service creates a framework for the fusion of the spiritual and the material, allowing for these revelations to permeate and remake our worldly existence.
FOOTNOTES
1. There are two explanations for this concept: a) In Hebrew, letters correspond to numbers. Since G-d created the world through speech, the numerical patterns created by the letters of the Ten Utterances of Creation reflect the interplay of G-d's creative forces (Tanya, Shaar HaYichud VehaEmunah, ch. 1).b) The Hebrew word for number is mispar (????). Accordingly, the statement of Sefer Yetzirah (1:1) that the world was created bisofar, bisefer, ubisippur (????? ???? ??????) is interpreted as referring to the merging of numerical patterns.
2. See the commentary of the Ramban to Genesis 2:3. Note as well the maamar Issa BiMidrash Tehillim (Sefer HaMaamarim 5708, p. 272ff.)
3. The cycle upon which the agricultural laws observed in Eretz Yisrael are based.
4. Rosh HaShanah 31a.
5. Mechilta, quoted in Rashi, Shmos 20:9.
6. Kli Yakar, commenting on Leviticus 9:1, the opening verse of our Torah reading. See also the Responsa of the Rashba (Vol. I, Responsum 9), which explains that eight refers to a rung of holiness that transcends the limits of nature.
7. Leviticus 9:1.
8. Ibid.: 23-24.
9. Gittin 50b, et al.
10. We find a similar motif with regard to Sefiras HaOmer the Counting of the Omer, a mitzvah which in many years is associated with the time when Parshas Shemini is read. We are obligated to count 49 (7x7) days to observe this mitzvah. Each day involves an effort to refine a specific dimension of our characters. The fiftieth day marks the celebration of Shavuos, which is associated with Divine light. See the essay entitled "Counting More than Days" (Timeless Patterns in Time, Vol. II, p. 63ff).
11. This reflects the fact that the name Shemini is associated with the entire Torah portion, and not merely the opening verse.
12. Leviticus 10:1-2.
13. See the commentary of Rashi to the above verse, Eruvin 63a, Toras Kohanim, commenting on Leviticus 16:1, Vayikra Rabbah 20:8-9.
14. Or HaChayim, commenting on Leviticus 16:1; Likkutei Sichos, Vol. III, p. 987ff; Timeless Patterns in Time, Vol. I, p. 52ff.
15. See Midrash Tanchuma, Parshas Bechukosai, sec. 3; Tanya, chs. 33 and 36.
16. See Inyano Shel Torah HaChassidus (English translation, "The Essence of the Teachings of Chassidus "), sec. 7.
17. Tivul Yom 2:5. Mishneh Torah, Hilchos Tumas Ochalin 8:10.
18. See Chulin 97a; Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah 105:5.
19. Archin 13b. See Likkutei Torah, Vayikra 21d. Note also the connection to this concept in the commentary of the Kli Yakar cited previously.
20. Isaiah 40:5.
21. In the series of maamarim entitled BeShaah Shehikdimu, Vol. II, p. 930, it is explained that this level refers to the dimension of Malchus within the Ein Sof as it exists before the tzimtzum.
22. Ch. 37.
http://sn111w.snt111.mail.live.com/default.aspx#!/mail/InboxLight.aspx?n=325920862!n=1936041193&fid=1&fav=1&mid=ddce8867-89f9-11e1-a4ae-00237de4a7e6&fv=1
Shemini; Leviticus 9:1-11:47
Print this Page
By Eli Touger
Adapted from
Likkutei Sichos, Vol. III, p. 973ff;
Vol. XVII, p. 92ff;
Sefer HaSichos 5749, p. 475ff
Learning What It Means To Count
In Jewish thought, numbers represent not only concepts in our material world, but spiritual forces which mold our reality.1 Seven is a fundamental number, representative of the seven Divine middos, the attributes which are the source for and which parallel our emotions. These middos comprise the active force which brings our material world into being.2 For this reason, time is structured in cycles of seven. There are seven days in the week, seven years in the Shemittah cycle,3 and our Sages speak4 of seven millennia as the span of the world's existence.
Shabbos, the seventh day, reflects perfection within the natural order. Just as the original Shabbos brought Creation to a close, on Shabbos a person should feel that "all his work is completed."5 Moreover, Shabbos does not symbolize only material perfection; referring to it as Shabbos Kodesh, " the holy Sabbath," indicates that the G-dly light enclothed within the world is manifest at that time.
The number eight, however, refers to an even higher level of holiness the G-dly light which transcends the limits of our world. Indeed, it eclipses the number seven to the extent that our Rabbis state6 that "the number seven is always mundane, while the number eight is holy."
"The Eighth Day"
These concepts are reflected in this week's Torah reading, Parshas Shemini. Shemini means "the eighth." It refers to the first of Nissan, the day on which the Sanctuary was established. It is called "the eighth day"7 because it was preceded by seven days of dedication, during which Moshe erected and took down the Sanctuary each day, and taught Aharon and his sons the order of sacrificial worship.
The Kli Yakar asks why the Torah employs the term, "the eighth day." For this day is not one of the seven days of dedication, and indeed represents a totally different plane. For it was on this day that G-d's presence manifested itself in the Sanctuary: "G-d's glory was revealed to the people and a fire came forth from before G-d."8
In resolution, he explains that the day is associated with this number to highlight its uniqueness. For the number eight is "set aside for G-d," representing a transcendence of the world's natural limits.
But this resolution is itself problematic. Since the number eight reflects such a high level, how can it be associated with the seven days that precede it? Calling it "the eighth day" implies the continuation of a sequence. Thus the very term used to accentuate the day's uniqueness points to its connection with the previous days.
Earning More Than We Can
The above difficulty can be resolved on the basis of a ruling with regard to monetary law:9 Giving a present is equated with a sale, because if the recipient had not generated satisfaction for the giver, he would not have granted him the gift.
Similarly with the concepts mentioned previously: the manifestation of G-d's presence cannot be drawn down by man's service, for it is a transcendent light. Instead, it must be granted as a gift from above. Nevertheless, when does G-d endow us with such a revelation? When we have created a fit setting for it when we have refined and developed our environment and ourselves to the limit of our abilities.
Thus the seven days of dedication represented man's efforts to refine our environment an objective within man's capacity. And by carrying out this objective, a setting is created for the revelations of the eighth day, the transcendent light.10
Focus on This World, Not on the Next
Moreover, when this transcendent revelation is brought about by man's Divine service, it does not remain an isolated occurrence, but permeates our environment, showing the immanence of infinite spirituality.
This concept is underscored by the continuation of the Torah reading,11 which speaks of the death of Aharon's sons, Nadav and Avihu. The Torah relates12 that they brought an unauthorized incense offering and as a result, "Fire came forth from G-d and consumed them."
Many explanations are offered as to why the brothers were punished by death.13 From a mystical perspective, it is said14 that they died because their souls soared to such heights that they could no longer remain in their bodies. Nevertheless, their conduct is judged unfavorably because their spiritual quest ran contrary to G-d's intent in creation: the establishment of a dwelling for Himself amidst the day-to-day realities of our existence.15 Their deaths show that our spiritual quest should not be directed towards the attainment of lofty rapture, but instead should remain firmly grounded in our actual lives.
This theme is also reflected in the conclusion of the Torah reading, which focuses on kosher food. For the establishment of a dietary code indicates that Judaism's conception of Divine service involves living within the world.
A Fusion of Opposites
This fusion of transcendence and immanence is also alluded to by the name Shemini. Shemini shares a root with the Hebrew word shemen, meaning "oil." Oil has two tendencies.16 On one hand, it floats above other liquids, to the extent that if an impure person touches oil floating on another liquid, the lower liquid is not rendered impure, for the two are not considered to be joined.17
On the other hand, oil permeates the entities on which it is placed. Therefore, if a non-kosher substance which is fat or oily is roasted together with other food, it makes the entire quantity of food non-kosher, although ordinarily only the food actually touching the non-kosher substance would be tainted.18
Similarly, with regard to the subject at hand, the essential light associated with the eighth day transcends the limits of our material realm. Nevertheless, G-d's intent is not that this light remain in a sublime state, but that it permeate the material world, endowing it with holiness.
New Doors of Perception
The number eight shares a connection to the Era of the Redemption, as our Sages state:19 "The harp of the Era of the Redemption will be of eight strands" (while the harp used in the Beis HaMikdash had seven strands).
The revelations of the Era of the Redemption will also follow the motif described above. Thus in describing those revelations, our prophets say:20 "And the glory of G-d will be revealed and all flesh will see." "The glory of G-d" refers to a spiritual peak21 above the natural order. This level will be "seen," perceived openly, by "all flesh"; mortals within our material world will realize this spiritual truth.
Moreover, these revelations will be an intrinsic part of that era. Just as today it is natural for our eyes to see material objects, in that era, all flesh will perceive the glory of G-d. This involves a remaking of the natural order through our Divine service. For as stated in Tanya,22 the revelations of the Era of the Redemption depend on our service during the time of exile.
To refer to concepts mentioned previously: seven prepares for eight. By refining and elevating ourselves and our environment in the present age, we precipitate the transcendent revelations of the Era of the Redemption. Our Divine service creates a framework for the fusion of the spiritual and the material, allowing for these revelations to permeate and remake our worldly existence.
FOOTNOTES
1. There are two explanations for this concept: a) In Hebrew, letters correspond to numbers. Since G-d created the world through speech, the numerical patterns created by the letters of the Ten Utterances of Creation reflect the interplay of G-d's creative forces (Tanya, Shaar HaYichud VehaEmunah, ch. 1).b) The Hebrew word for number is mispar (????). Accordingly, the statement of Sefer Yetzirah (1:1) that the world was created bisofar, bisefer, ubisippur (????? ???? ??????) is interpreted as referring to the merging of numerical patterns.
2. See the commentary of the Ramban to Genesis 2:3. Note as well the maamar Issa BiMidrash Tehillim (Sefer HaMaamarim 5708, p. 272ff.)
3. The cycle upon which the agricultural laws observed in Eretz Yisrael are based.
4. Rosh HaShanah 31a.
5. Mechilta, quoted in Rashi, Shmos 20:9.
6. Kli Yakar, commenting on Leviticus 9:1, the opening verse of our Torah reading. See also the Responsa of the Rashba (Vol. I, Responsum 9), which explains that eight refers to a rung of holiness that transcends the limits of nature.
7. Leviticus 9:1.
8. Ibid.: 23-24.
9. Gittin 50b, et al.
10. We find a similar motif with regard to Sefiras HaOmer the Counting of the Omer, a mitzvah which in many years is associated with the time when Parshas Shemini is read. We are obligated to count 49 (7x7) days to observe this mitzvah. Each day involves an effort to refine a specific dimension of our characters. The fiftieth day marks the celebration of Shavuos, which is associated with Divine light. See the essay entitled "Counting More than Days" (Timeless Patterns in Time, Vol. II, p. 63ff).
11. This reflects the fact that the name Shemini is associated with the entire Torah portion, and not merely the opening verse.
12. Leviticus 10:1-2.
13. See the commentary of Rashi to the above verse, Eruvin 63a, Toras Kohanim, commenting on Leviticus 16:1, Vayikra Rabbah 20:8-9.
14. Or HaChayim, commenting on Leviticus 16:1; Likkutei Sichos, Vol. III, p. 987ff; Timeless Patterns in Time, Vol. I, p. 52ff.
15. See Midrash Tanchuma, Parshas Bechukosai, sec. 3; Tanya, chs. 33 and 36.
16. See Inyano Shel Torah HaChassidus (English translation, "The Essence of the Teachings of Chassidus "), sec. 7.
17. Tivul Yom 2:5. Mishneh Torah, Hilchos Tumas Ochalin 8:10.
18. See Chulin 97a; Shulchan Aruch, Yoreh De'ah 105:5.
19. Archin 13b. See Likkutei Torah, Vayikra 21d. Note also the connection to this concept in the commentary of the Kli Yakar cited previously.
20. Isaiah 40:5.
21. In the series of maamarim entitled BeShaah Shehikdimu, Vol. II, p. 930, it is explained that this level refers to the dimension of Malchus within the Ein Sof as it exists before the tzimtzum.
22. Ch. 37.
Wednesday, May 9, 2012
The_Golden_Salamander
http://movies.netflix.com/WiMovie/The_Golden_Salamander/70147295?trkid=496624
A film that has a lot to offer,and for some unknown reason there has not been too many takers.. Or maybe I should say viewers A very good script that offers the cast to really show their skills.. And in the case Anouk Aimee beauty as well Trevor Howard is well fitted for his role,and at times you se...read moree a little Indiana Jones in her character... Story has a few nice twists to it,and there is enough action,and suspense to hold you interest quite well.. The car ride down the mountain in the storm will have you checking your seat belt... Supporting cast is as good as the film is,and no review is complete without honoring them Have two that I thought were especially good... Wilfred Hyde-White in a odd role for him,and Herbert Lom for his journeyman performance in his role.. A film that really is vastly unappreciated.. Mores the shame
This movie was done very well. The acting, dialog,and senary was masterful. It doesnt deliver the heart stopping thrills of an Alfred Hichcock movie, But certainly shares a lot of his influence. This movie seems under rated to me. I think it deserves 3.5 stars. And should remain in the Clas...read moresics Genre. And I consider myself a tough critic.
There was a time when the story was more important than the special effects, and this film is a good representative of that era. There are a number of reasons to see this one. I hesitate to make comparisons to Casablanca, but... The plot has enough twists and turns to keep it interesting. There are ...read morea host of sinister characters, and a debonair hero. The cozy restaurant, run by French expatriots, is not as glamorous as Ricks Cafe Americain, but it has plenty of atmosphere, helped along by a talented pianist. Not the least of the lot, there is the gorgeous leading lady, Anouk Aimee. At the tender age of 18, this was her first significant role, years before she made it big in A Man and a Woman. Walter Rilla does an excellent job as the unflappable villain, as does Herbert Lom in the role of his henchman. You might recognize the piano player, Wilfred Hyde-White, as one of the costars of My Fair Lady. Trevor Howards performance, so natural and unaffected, as the principled archaeologist David Redfern, is what really holds this movie together, as he slowly comes to terms with the ethics of a difficult situation. It is the title subject, the golden salamander, which points the way. Look for wonderful contrast and definition in the black and white cinematography, and an engaging score by little-known English composer William Alwyn. 3.5 stars my scale, an official 3. 22 Apr11
Golden Salamander (film) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search Golden Salamander
Directed by Ronald Neame
Produced by Alexander Galperson
Written by Victor Canning (novel and screenplay)
Ronald Neame
Lesley Storm
Starring Trevor Howard
Anouk Aimée
Herbert Lom
Release date(s) 1 September 1950
Running time 87 min.
Country United Kingdom
Language English
Golden Salamander is a 1950 adventure film directed by Ronald Neame and starring Trevor Howard as an archaeologist in North Africa who runs afoul of a crime sydicate. It won an award at the 1950 Locarno International Film Festival.[1] It is based on Victor Canning's novel The Golden Salamander, itself based on the Peter Prudden book The Night That Came.
[edit] CastTrevor Howard as David Redfern
Anouk Aimée as Anna (as Anouk)
Herbert Lom as Rankl
Walter Rilla as Serafis
Miles Malleson as Douvet
Jacques Sernas as Max
Wilfrid Hyde-White as Agno
Peter Copley as Aribi
Marcel Poncin as Dommic
Kathleen Boutall as Mme. Guillard
Eugene Deckers as Police Chief
Percy Walsh as Guillard
Sybille Binder as Mme. Labree
[edit] References1.^ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0043594/awards
[edit] External linksGolden Salamander at the Internet Movie Database
Films directed by Ronald Neame
1940s Take My Life (1947)
1950s Golden Salamander (1950) ·The Card (1952) ·The Million Pound Note (1954) ·The Man Who Never Was (1956) ·The Seventh Sin (1957) ·Windom's Way (1957) ·The Horse's Mouth (1958)
1960s Tunes of Glory (1960) ·Escape from Zahrain (1962) ·I Could Go On Singing (1963) ·The Chalk Garden (1964) ·Mister Moses (1965) ·A Man Could Get Killed (1966) ·Gambit (1966) ·Prudence and the Pill (1968) ·The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie (1969)
1970s Scrooge (1970) ·The Poseidon Adventure (1972) ·The Odessa File (1974) ·Meteor (1979)
1980s Hopscotch (1980) ·First Monday in October (1981) ·Foreign Body (1986)
http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9F00E1DD1138E13BBC4C51DFB566838A649EDE
Movie Review
The Golden Salamander (1950)
March 24, 1951
THE SCREEN IN REVIEW; 'Golden Salamander,' a British Adventure Film, Is New Bill at Little Carnegie At the Criterion
The Britishers' taste for the exotic in their romantic adventure yarns is quite evident in "Golden Salamander," which came to the Little Carnegie yesterday. And this liberal indulgence of preference is most fortunate in this case, for the authentic Tunisian backgrounds and atmosphere of this film are its best points—these and a pretty young lady who now goes by the name of Anouk.
Miss Anouk (if that is how we should call her) is a wistful but strong and pliant girl who recently made a quite impressive appearance in "The Lovers of Verona," a French film. And now, as a French girl residing in a somewhat remote Tunisian town where things happen during the course of this picture, she continues to draw attention to herself. A sweet face; a youthful, vital figure and a reserved but magnetic sort of charm seem to be more in her favor just now than a striking ability to act.
However, in this instance, she is fortunately given little to do except blend into the atmosphere of mystery and string along with a nice adventure tale. This tale, based up on a lusty novel by Victor Canning, who helped prepare the script, is a customary lot of hokus-pokus in the romantic British vein. An archaeologist from the British Museum arrives in this small Tunisian town to pack up some relics for shipment and gets caught in a gun-running plot. He also gets caught in the soft toils of the exiled French girl's adhesive love—and between the two preoccupations, he has himself quite a busy time.
As the scientist, Trevor Howard delivers his usual sincere and forceful job, demonstrating as much evolution into a bold adventurer as the script will allow. Under Ronald Neame's easy-going direction, he emerges from his academic calm rather abruptly but with absolute assurance once the melodramatic heat is turned on. Herbert Lom is extravagantly evil as the gunman of the gun-running gang and Walter Rilla is exquisitely silky as the lord of a Moorish villa and boss of the mob. A vast lot of outdoor action within the crowded streets of a Tunisian town and in the midst of a noisy native boar-hunt (for the climax) brings color to the film. The atmosphere is even augmented by a wistful pianist who plays dreamy bar-room tunes.
GOLDEN SALAMANDER; screen play by Lesley Storm, Victor Canning and Ronald Neame, from the novel of the same name by Mr. Canning; directed by Mr. Neame and presented by J. Arthur Rank; released by Eagle Lion Classics. At the Little Carnegie.
David . . . . . Trevor Howard
Anna . . . . . Anouk
Rankl . . . . . Herbert Lom
Douvet . . . . . Miles Malleson
Serafis . . . . . Walter Rilla
Max . . . . . Jacques Sernas
Agno . . . . . Wilfred Hyde-White
Aribi . . . . . Peter Copley
French Chief of Police . . . . . Eugene Deckers
http://www.tcm.turner.com/this-month/article/205141%7C0/The-Golden-Salamander.html
The Golden SalamanderAn archaeologist stumbles into the territory of an evil crime syndicate and struggles to set things right in The Golden Salamander (1950). Filmed on location in Tunisia, this routine action adventure was an unusual choice for Trevor Howard to make following his critically acclaimed performance in Carol Reed's The Third Man but part of the lure may have been the exotic location. Howard was an actor with wanderlust and loved visiting other countries, especially when he was being paid for it.
The Golden Salamander was the first major film production directed by cinematographer/screenwriter Ronald Neame; he had previously directed a low-budget crime thriller in 1947 entitled Take My Life. When Neame first offered the film to Howard, he turned it down but then changed his mind and was soon delighted to be playing opposite French actress Anouk Aimee, who was the love interest. Aimee was at the very beginning of her film career and had just attracted international attention for her role in Andre Cayatte's Les Amants de Verone (1949). During the filming Howard and Aimee became very close, resulting in rumors of an affair but no evidence exists that it did, much to the relief of Howard's wife, who was genuinely concerned for awhile that the picture might ultimately cause the breakup of her marriage.
The Golden Salamander was nothing more than a standard genre thriller but it afforded some comical moments during filming. "One of the best scenes on location was, Neame recalls (in Trevor Howard: A Gentleman and a Player by Vivienne Knight), unfortunately not for the picture. Shooting was taking place in an open market of a native village which was filthy, squalid and filled with Arabs buying and selling fly-covered local produce: a nice natural scene with thousands of free extras. The script called for Trevor Howard to work his way through the crowd in the market place. The camera was set up, creating a stir in itself since none of the locals had ever seen one before. Then came a loud hailer emitting interpreted pleas to the crowd to behave quite normally and naturally, just as though the camera wasn't there and, this above all, "Please don't look at the camera." It was a crane shot and there could be no rehearsal. It was all set. Ronnie Neame lifted his megaphone, shouted "Action!" and all hell was let loose: the Arabs started to fight, stalls were knocked over and a number of participants were knocked out. In the middle of it all Trevor Howard strugged with shock, amazement and other people. When, with some difficulty, a degree of order was restored and Arab had stopped tearing into Arab, it transpired that the word 'action' had triggered off something they had either seen in films, or thought should happen in films: action equalled fighting. But Ronnie Neame found out that, once they got the hang of it, many of the voluntary extras were quite good. So, up to a point, was the film."
Typical of the critical reviews that The Golden Salamander received upon its theatrical release is this one by Bosley Crowther in The New York Times: "The Britishers' taste for the exotic in their romantic adventure yarns is quite evident in "Golden Salamander," which came to the Little Carnegie yesterday. And this liberal indulgence of preference is most fortunate in this case, for the authentic Tunisian backgrounds and atmosphere of this film are its best points-these and a pretty young lady who now goes by the name of Anouk...As the scientist, Trevor Howard delivers his usual sincere and forceful job, demonstrating as much evolution into a bold adventurer as the script will allow. Under Ronald Neame's easy-going direction, he emerges from his academic calm rather abruptly but with absolute assurance once the melodramatic heat is turned on. Herbert Lom is extravagantly evil as the gunman of the gun-running gang and Walter Rilla is exquisitely silky as the lord of a Moorish villa and boss of the mob. A vast lot of outdoor action within the crowded streets of a Tunisian town and in the midst of a noisy native boar-hunt (for the climax) brings color to the film. The atmosphere is even augmented by a wistful pianist who plays dreamy bar-room tunes."
Producer: Alexander Galperson
Director: Ronald Neame
Screenplay: Lesley Storm, Victor Canning, Ronald Neame
Cinematography: Oswald Morris
Art Direction:
Music: William Alwyn
Film Editing: Jack Harris
Cast: Trevor Howard (David Redfern), Anouk (Anna), Herbert Lom (Rankl), Walter Rilla (Serafis), Miles Malleson (Douvet), Jacques Sernas (Max), Wilfrid Hyde-White (Agno), Peter Copley (Aribi), Marcel Poncin (Dommic), Kathleen Boutall (Mme. Guillard)
BW-94m.
by Jeff Stafford
A film that has a lot to offer,and for some unknown reason there has not been too many takers.. Or maybe I should say viewers A very good script that offers the cast to really show their skills.. And in the case Anouk Aimee beauty as well Trevor Howard is well fitted for his role,and at times you se...read moree a little Indiana Jones in her character... Story has a few nice twists to it,and there is enough action,and suspense to hold you interest quite well.. The car ride down the mountain in the storm will have you checking your seat belt... Supporting cast is as good as the film is,and no review is complete without honoring them Have two that I thought were especially good... Wilfred Hyde-White in a odd role for him,and Herbert Lom for his journeyman performance in his role.. A film that really is vastly unappreciated.. Mores the shame
This movie was done very well. The acting, dialog,and senary was masterful. It doesnt deliver the heart stopping thrills of an Alfred Hichcock movie, But certainly shares a lot of his influence. This movie seems under rated to me. I think it deserves 3.5 stars. And should remain in the Clas...read moresics Genre. And I consider myself a tough critic.
There was a time when the story was more important than the special effects, and this film is a good representative of that era. There are a number of reasons to see this one. I hesitate to make comparisons to Casablanca, but... The plot has enough twists and turns to keep it interesting. There are ...read morea host of sinister characters, and a debonair hero. The cozy restaurant, run by French expatriots, is not as glamorous as Ricks Cafe Americain, but it has plenty of atmosphere, helped along by a talented pianist. Not the least of the lot, there is the gorgeous leading lady, Anouk Aimee. At the tender age of 18, this was her first significant role, years before she made it big in A Man and a Woman. Walter Rilla does an excellent job as the unflappable villain, as does Herbert Lom in the role of his henchman. You might recognize the piano player, Wilfred Hyde-White, as one of the costars of My Fair Lady. Trevor Howards performance, so natural and unaffected, as the principled archaeologist David Redfern, is what really holds this movie together, as he slowly comes to terms with the ethics of a difficult situation. It is the title subject, the golden salamander, which points the way. Look for wonderful contrast and definition in the black and white cinematography, and an engaging score by little-known English composer William Alwyn. 3.5 stars my scale, an official 3. 22 Apr11
Golden Salamander (film) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search Golden Salamander
Directed by Ronald Neame
Produced by Alexander Galperson
Written by Victor Canning (novel and screenplay)
Ronald Neame
Lesley Storm
Starring Trevor Howard
Anouk Aimée
Herbert Lom
Release date(s) 1 September 1950
Running time 87 min.
Country United Kingdom
Language English
Golden Salamander is a 1950 adventure film directed by Ronald Neame and starring Trevor Howard as an archaeologist in North Africa who runs afoul of a crime sydicate. It won an award at the 1950 Locarno International Film Festival.[1] It is based on Victor Canning's novel The Golden Salamander, itself based on the Peter Prudden book The Night That Came.
[edit] CastTrevor Howard as David Redfern
Anouk Aimée as Anna (as Anouk)
Herbert Lom as Rankl
Walter Rilla as Serafis
Miles Malleson as Douvet
Jacques Sernas as Max
Wilfrid Hyde-White as Agno
Peter Copley as Aribi
Marcel Poncin as Dommic
Kathleen Boutall as Mme. Guillard
Eugene Deckers as Police Chief
Percy Walsh as Guillard
Sybille Binder as Mme. Labree
[edit] References1.^ http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0043594/awards
[edit] External linksGolden Salamander at the Internet Movie Database
Films directed by Ronald Neame
1940s Take My Life (1947)
1950s Golden Salamander (1950) ·The Card (1952) ·The Million Pound Note (1954) ·The Man Who Never Was (1956) ·The Seventh Sin (1957) ·Windom's Way (1957) ·The Horse's Mouth (1958)
1960s Tunes of Glory (1960) ·Escape from Zahrain (1962) ·I Could Go On Singing (1963) ·The Chalk Garden (1964) ·Mister Moses (1965) ·A Man Could Get Killed (1966) ·Gambit (1966) ·Prudence and the Pill (1968) ·The Prime of Miss Jean Brodie (1969)
1970s Scrooge (1970) ·The Poseidon Adventure (1972) ·The Odessa File (1974) ·Meteor (1979)
1980s Hopscotch (1980) ·First Monday in October (1981) ·Foreign Body (1986)
http://movies.nytimes.com/movie/review?res=9F00E1DD1138E13BBC4C51DFB566838A649EDE
Movie Review
The Golden Salamander (1950)
March 24, 1951
THE SCREEN IN REVIEW; 'Golden Salamander,' a British Adventure Film, Is New Bill at Little Carnegie At the Criterion
The Britishers' taste for the exotic in their romantic adventure yarns is quite evident in "Golden Salamander," which came to the Little Carnegie yesterday. And this liberal indulgence of preference is most fortunate in this case, for the authentic Tunisian backgrounds and atmosphere of this film are its best points—these and a pretty young lady who now goes by the name of Anouk.
Miss Anouk (if that is how we should call her) is a wistful but strong and pliant girl who recently made a quite impressive appearance in "The Lovers of Verona," a French film. And now, as a French girl residing in a somewhat remote Tunisian town where things happen during the course of this picture, she continues to draw attention to herself. A sweet face; a youthful, vital figure and a reserved but magnetic sort of charm seem to be more in her favor just now than a striking ability to act.
However, in this instance, she is fortunately given little to do except blend into the atmosphere of mystery and string along with a nice adventure tale. This tale, based up on a lusty novel by Victor Canning, who helped prepare the script, is a customary lot of hokus-pokus in the romantic British vein. An archaeologist from the British Museum arrives in this small Tunisian town to pack up some relics for shipment and gets caught in a gun-running plot. He also gets caught in the soft toils of the exiled French girl's adhesive love—and between the two preoccupations, he has himself quite a busy time.
As the scientist, Trevor Howard delivers his usual sincere and forceful job, demonstrating as much evolution into a bold adventurer as the script will allow. Under Ronald Neame's easy-going direction, he emerges from his academic calm rather abruptly but with absolute assurance once the melodramatic heat is turned on. Herbert Lom is extravagantly evil as the gunman of the gun-running gang and Walter Rilla is exquisitely silky as the lord of a Moorish villa and boss of the mob. A vast lot of outdoor action within the crowded streets of a Tunisian town and in the midst of a noisy native boar-hunt (for the climax) brings color to the film. The atmosphere is even augmented by a wistful pianist who plays dreamy bar-room tunes.
GOLDEN SALAMANDER; screen play by Lesley Storm, Victor Canning and Ronald Neame, from the novel of the same name by Mr. Canning; directed by Mr. Neame and presented by J. Arthur Rank; released by Eagle Lion Classics. At the Little Carnegie.
David . . . . . Trevor Howard
Anna . . . . . Anouk
Rankl . . . . . Herbert Lom
Douvet . . . . . Miles Malleson
Serafis . . . . . Walter Rilla
Max . . . . . Jacques Sernas
Agno . . . . . Wilfred Hyde-White
Aribi . . . . . Peter Copley
French Chief of Police . . . . . Eugene Deckers
http://www.tcm.turner.com/this-month/article/205141%7C0/The-Golden-Salamander.html
The Golden SalamanderAn archaeologist stumbles into the territory of an evil crime syndicate and struggles to set things right in The Golden Salamander (1950). Filmed on location in Tunisia, this routine action adventure was an unusual choice for Trevor Howard to make following his critically acclaimed performance in Carol Reed's The Third Man but part of the lure may have been the exotic location. Howard was an actor with wanderlust and loved visiting other countries, especially when he was being paid for it.
The Golden Salamander was the first major film production directed by cinematographer/screenwriter Ronald Neame; he had previously directed a low-budget crime thriller in 1947 entitled Take My Life. When Neame first offered the film to Howard, he turned it down but then changed his mind and was soon delighted to be playing opposite French actress Anouk Aimee, who was the love interest. Aimee was at the very beginning of her film career and had just attracted international attention for her role in Andre Cayatte's Les Amants de Verone (1949). During the filming Howard and Aimee became very close, resulting in rumors of an affair but no evidence exists that it did, much to the relief of Howard's wife, who was genuinely concerned for awhile that the picture might ultimately cause the breakup of her marriage.
The Golden Salamander was nothing more than a standard genre thriller but it afforded some comical moments during filming. "One of the best scenes on location was, Neame recalls (in Trevor Howard: A Gentleman and a Player by Vivienne Knight), unfortunately not for the picture. Shooting was taking place in an open market of a native village which was filthy, squalid and filled with Arabs buying and selling fly-covered local produce: a nice natural scene with thousands of free extras. The script called for Trevor Howard to work his way through the crowd in the market place. The camera was set up, creating a stir in itself since none of the locals had ever seen one before. Then came a loud hailer emitting interpreted pleas to the crowd to behave quite normally and naturally, just as though the camera wasn't there and, this above all, "Please don't look at the camera." It was a crane shot and there could be no rehearsal. It was all set. Ronnie Neame lifted his megaphone, shouted "Action!" and all hell was let loose: the Arabs started to fight, stalls were knocked over and a number of participants were knocked out. In the middle of it all Trevor Howard strugged with shock, amazement and other people. When, with some difficulty, a degree of order was restored and Arab had stopped tearing into Arab, it transpired that the word 'action' had triggered off something they had either seen in films, or thought should happen in films: action equalled fighting. But Ronnie Neame found out that, once they got the hang of it, many of the voluntary extras were quite good. So, up to a point, was the film."
Typical of the critical reviews that The Golden Salamander received upon its theatrical release is this one by Bosley Crowther in The New York Times: "The Britishers' taste for the exotic in their romantic adventure yarns is quite evident in "Golden Salamander," which came to the Little Carnegie yesterday. And this liberal indulgence of preference is most fortunate in this case, for the authentic Tunisian backgrounds and atmosphere of this film are its best points-these and a pretty young lady who now goes by the name of Anouk...As the scientist, Trevor Howard delivers his usual sincere and forceful job, demonstrating as much evolution into a bold adventurer as the script will allow. Under Ronald Neame's easy-going direction, he emerges from his academic calm rather abruptly but with absolute assurance once the melodramatic heat is turned on. Herbert Lom is extravagantly evil as the gunman of the gun-running gang and Walter Rilla is exquisitely silky as the lord of a Moorish villa and boss of the mob. A vast lot of outdoor action within the crowded streets of a Tunisian town and in the midst of a noisy native boar-hunt (for the climax) brings color to the film. The atmosphere is even augmented by a wistful pianist who plays dreamy bar-room tunes."
Producer: Alexander Galperson
Director: Ronald Neame
Screenplay: Lesley Storm, Victor Canning, Ronald Neame
Cinematography: Oswald Morris
Art Direction:
Music: William Alwyn
Film Editing: Jack Harris
Cast: Trevor Howard (David Redfern), Anouk (Anna), Herbert Lom (Rankl), Walter Rilla (Serafis), Miles Malleson (Douvet), Jacques Sernas (Max), Wilfrid Hyde-White (Agno), Peter Copley (Aribi), Marcel Poncin (Dommic), Kathleen Boutall (Mme. Guillard)
BW-94m.
by Jeff Stafford
Labels:
Anouk Aimée,
Jacques Sernas,
Ronald Neame,
Trevor Howard,
Walter Rilla
Tuesday, May 8, 2012
amshinover-rebbe
http://pitputim.wordpress.com/category/rabonim/amshinover-rebbe/
pitputim
A collection of my musings
Category Archives: Amshinover Rebbe
What does one say-a last vestige of the Chassidim of yore?
Posted on September 14, 2011 by pitputim
The Amshinover Rebbe is a controversial figure. Amshinov descended from the famed R’Yitzchak Vurka ז’ל who was linked to R’ Simcha Bunim of P’Shischa (whose disciples included the Kotzker, Chiddushei HaRim of Ger, Alexander and more) right back to the Magid of Mezritch.
Early complaints against Chassidim in general were about their reported lack of respect for certain aspects of Halacha and strange practices during davening. One of these, but by no means the only one, was their seeming disdain for davening within the mandated halachic time frame: the Zman. Some, such as Rabbi Dr Norman Lamm described this behaviour as “antinomianism”. It was as if there was a “higher imperative” that surpassed the halachic imperative. These complaints fuelled early litvak/misnagdic distaste for Chassidic Rebbes and the Chassidic lifestyle. Many Rebbes were comparatively unlearned. Unlike their misnagdic brethren, Rebbes were often not experts in many facets of Jewish learning, and concentrated on simple drashos, one liners, and seemingly fanciful stories.
These days, the number of Rebbes has by no means subsided. Elements of Chassidism, such as the reverence for an uber Rabbi, have invaded the misnagdic Weltanschauung. Most Rebbes are respected solely by their Chassidim, save for a chosen few whose learning and well-known middos and deeds are universally acknowledged.
Acknowledged by both the Chassidic and Misnagdic/Litvak world, there is an unobtrusive Rebbe in Bayit Vegan,
The Amshinover Rebbe שליט’’א
who is uniformly respected. Many an itinerant Yeshiva student who slept in, knew they could go to the Rebbe’s Beis HaMedrash because they would always catch the Minyan “on time”, even well after the Zman. The Rebbe’s davening and preparation for davening meant that time was an irrelevant imposition in his quest for nearness to Hashem.
Yes, my great-grandfather and name-sake was a simple Amshinover Chosid who lived in Boguszyce, and delivered chalav yisrael and cheese goods from his small farm by horse and buggy to nearby towns and villages. Yes, I have tried on two occasions to see the Rebbe given that I am somewhat of a pseudo-Polish romantic (others would describe my malady as extreme second generation post holocaust syndrome). I have been unsuccessful (maybe there is a message there). I also felt somewhat “wrong” to seek Yechidus and waste the Rebbe’s time given that I didn’t have a particular problem or issue that I felt I needed to discuss. That’s probably due to the part Brisker in me on my grandmother’s side and the influence of the Rav on my outlook.
Recently, someone emailed me a comment post from a hebrew web site. I thought it might be useful to loosely translate the comment and post it below.
There are some Rebbes, Rabonim and Roshei Yeshivos from this and past generations, about whom many believed and believe that they are Tzadikim and holy. Sometimes this belief comes about because of the (biased) education imparted in the house, other times this belief is purely a political imperative.
It is only very few, about whom one can sense with one’s own eyes, irrespective of earlier biases, their true righteousness, and pure Avodas Hashem.
The Amshinover Rebbe is the Rebbe about whom one does not need to believe that he is a Tzadik. This can be readily observed every minute and hour of the day, each day, over many years.
Without minimising the importance of others, I do not think there is anyone in our generation who approaches the Amshinover Rebbe’s stature as a Tzadik, and who serves Hashem in his holy way and through pure Avodas Hashem.
I’m talking about a person who is ascetic in the extreme. He barely eats (he drinks a natural juice concentrate), sleeps 5-6 hours in a week and lives a life of extreme simplicity. He doesn’t have the trappings of many “grand” Rebbes. He doesn’t have a fancy car at his disposal. He wears basic clothing. On the door of his apartment of three rooms, on the second floor, there is a sign which simply reads “Family Milekowski”. In this apartment of three rooms, twelve children were brought up. He literally runs away from any smell of honour, has no special honoured seat for Davening and at a Tish, he sits on a plain bench. He has no use for extravagant silver utensils or accoutrements.
His love for fellow Jews is unparalleled, spending many hours each day helping people from all around the world. He cares for each Jew irrespective of which group they may belong to. Whoever hasn’t experienced his love, cannot understand what I mean. Even when he talks to fifteen year old children he uses words of respect and speaks in the third person.
He is the only Rebbe, in my opinion, who has never allowed a word to cross his lips without careful forethought. He doesn’t unload on anyone. This is someone who trembles with a countenance revealing his genuine fear of Hashem. Each time he even makes the most “mundane” of brachos the trepidation in saying Hashem’s name is palpable . The Rebbe never sits during davening, even if that davening takes him 10 hours.
The Amshinover Rebbe is possessed with unique strength. There are innumerable stories and testimonies from people who will support what I have written above. To give you a feel, I’ll relate one.
A few years ago, on Rosh Hashana, after two entire days without sleep and being involved with intensive davening that included a 7 hours personal Shmone Esreh, the Rebbe proceeded to wish a “Git Yohr” for four hours as people passed in front of him. After aTish, just before T’kias Shofar, the Rebbe informed his Gabbay that he needed to leave for some sleep. Before he entered his room, the Rebbe requested that the Gabbay wake him in nine minutes. After nine minutes, as the Gabbay entered, the Rebbe immediately jumped up and re-entered the Beis Medrash as if he has enjoyed a complete sleep. The Rebbe had minimised his bodily needs.
In respect of the Rebbe’s knowledge of Torah, he was never “caught out” on any topic: Bavli, Yerushalmi, Shulchan Aruch, Poskim, Kabbala, Chassidus or Sheylos U’Tshuvos (many tried to catch him out, but were unsuccessful). Even to this day, the Rebbe maintains Chevrusos studying all these topics.
I could go on and on about the Rebbe’s greatness, but it would be unnecessary if one takes the above into their hearts with seriousness. Nobody seriously questions the Rebbe because he is a giant of giants who serves Hashem constantly, and surely won’t err in Halacha.
I will finish with one story, which admittedly I heard second-hand. That being said, “well known things don’t require proof”.
R’ Shlomo Zalman Auerbach ז’ל, loved and respected the Rebbe. Once, R’ ShlomoZalman was asked how it was possible that the Rebbe seemingly didn’t follow Halacha (on account of the Rebbe davening after the Zman). R’ Shlomo Zalman answered:
“The Mishna in Pirkei Avos says that one Mitzvah causes another Mitzvah and an Aveirah causes another Aveirah. There are two ways of understanding this double meaning. When a man does a good deed, but isn’t sure whether what he did was indeed a good deed, look and see if the Yetzer Hora stirs the man or whether the Yetzer Hora is sidelined and leaves him alone. The obvious way to answer this is to look at the next action, after the Mitzvah. If the next action is good, then this is proof that the first action was also good.
When the Amshinover Rebbe does something which isn’t easily understood, we don’t know if he is doing Mitzvos or Aveyros ח’ו. Have a look at what his next actions are. They are Mitzvos … “
It’s important to note that the Rebbe studied for several years in Yeshivas Brisk. He grew up in an authentic “Litvak” home (his father was the Gaon R’ Chaim Milekovski). In all aspects of his life the Rebbe is a Machmir and punctilious, even more than the Briskers and the Chazon Ishnikes. This extends to all aspects of Kashrus, Pesach Chumros, Succos, Daled Minim, giving honour and respect to another human being, avoiding Machlokes, not speaking Lashon Hara etc. Do you know another Rebbe who has not had a single Machlokes with anyone?
The Rebbe is always on the go, rushing around with his eyes perched downwards. Everything the Rebbe does is with great care and Zrizus.
One more last story will serve to elucidate how much we don’t really know about him or appreciate his greatness.
A few years ago, on the Hillula of a previous Rebbe, his great-grandfather R’ Shimon Sholem ז’ל (Rabbi Shimon Sholem was a major driving force behind the exodus of thousands of young men in Mir, Kletzk, Radin, Novhardok, and other yeshivas via Japan to Shanghai at the outbreak of World War II and was also widely respected by the Rayatz of Chabad) on the 19th of Av,
the Rebbe went to R’ Shimon Sholem’s grave site in the old city of T’verya. On the way, he davens Shachris at the Kever of R’ Meir Ba’al HaNes. In that year, the Rebbe arrived very early at the Kever of R’ Meir Ba’al HaNes, and the Chassidim were sure that the Rebbe would manage to daven by the Zman. The Chassidim were astonished. The Rebbe paced around the Beis Medrash at the Kever of R’ Meir Ba’al HaNes deep in thought, occasionally glancing at the ticking clock. The Rebbe continued to pace back and forth, sweating profusely in the Tiberian heat. In the end, the Rebbe paced deep in thought for a full six hours, preparing himself for the eventual T’filla. What was the Rebbe thinking about? What was he waiting for? Everyone watched in astonishment. We will never know.
“The purpose of knowing, is that we will never know”
pitputim
A collection of my musings
Category Archives: Amshinover Rebbe
What does one say-a last vestige of the Chassidim of yore?
Posted on September 14, 2011 by pitputim
The Amshinover Rebbe is a controversial figure. Amshinov descended from the famed R’Yitzchak Vurka ז’ל who was linked to R’ Simcha Bunim of P’Shischa (whose disciples included the Kotzker, Chiddushei HaRim of Ger, Alexander and more) right back to the Magid of Mezritch.
Early complaints against Chassidim in general were about their reported lack of respect for certain aspects of Halacha and strange practices during davening. One of these, but by no means the only one, was their seeming disdain for davening within the mandated halachic time frame: the Zman. Some, such as Rabbi Dr Norman Lamm described this behaviour as “antinomianism”. It was as if there was a “higher imperative” that surpassed the halachic imperative. These complaints fuelled early litvak/misnagdic distaste for Chassidic Rebbes and the Chassidic lifestyle. Many Rebbes were comparatively unlearned. Unlike their misnagdic brethren, Rebbes were often not experts in many facets of Jewish learning, and concentrated on simple drashos, one liners, and seemingly fanciful stories.
These days, the number of Rebbes has by no means subsided. Elements of Chassidism, such as the reverence for an uber Rabbi, have invaded the misnagdic Weltanschauung. Most Rebbes are respected solely by their Chassidim, save for a chosen few whose learning and well-known middos and deeds are universally acknowledged.
Acknowledged by both the Chassidic and Misnagdic/Litvak world, there is an unobtrusive Rebbe in Bayit Vegan,
The Amshinover Rebbe שליט’’א
who is uniformly respected. Many an itinerant Yeshiva student who slept in, knew they could go to the Rebbe’s Beis HaMedrash because they would always catch the Minyan “on time”, even well after the Zman. The Rebbe’s davening and preparation for davening meant that time was an irrelevant imposition in his quest for nearness to Hashem.
Yes, my great-grandfather and name-sake was a simple Amshinover Chosid who lived in Boguszyce, and delivered chalav yisrael and cheese goods from his small farm by horse and buggy to nearby towns and villages. Yes, I have tried on two occasions to see the Rebbe given that I am somewhat of a pseudo-Polish romantic (others would describe my malady as extreme second generation post holocaust syndrome). I have been unsuccessful (maybe there is a message there). I also felt somewhat “wrong” to seek Yechidus and waste the Rebbe’s time given that I didn’t have a particular problem or issue that I felt I needed to discuss. That’s probably due to the part Brisker in me on my grandmother’s side and the influence of the Rav on my outlook.
Recently, someone emailed me a comment post from a hebrew web site. I thought it might be useful to loosely translate the comment and post it below.
There are some Rebbes, Rabonim and Roshei Yeshivos from this and past generations, about whom many believed and believe that they are Tzadikim and holy. Sometimes this belief comes about because of the (biased) education imparted in the house, other times this belief is purely a political imperative.
It is only very few, about whom one can sense with one’s own eyes, irrespective of earlier biases, their true righteousness, and pure Avodas Hashem.
The Amshinover Rebbe is the Rebbe about whom one does not need to believe that he is a Tzadik. This can be readily observed every minute and hour of the day, each day, over many years.
Without minimising the importance of others, I do not think there is anyone in our generation who approaches the Amshinover Rebbe’s stature as a Tzadik, and who serves Hashem in his holy way and through pure Avodas Hashem.
I’m talking about a person who is ascetic in the extreme. He barely eats (he drinks a natural juice concentrate), sleeps 5-6 hours in a week and lives a life of extreme simplicity. He doesn’t have the trappings of many “grand” Rebbes. He doesn’t have a fancy car at his disposal. He wears basic clothing. On the door of his apartment of three rooms, on the second floor, there is a sign which simply reads “Family Milekowski”. In this apartment of three rooms, twelve children were brought up. He literally runs away from any smell of honour, has no special honoured seat for Davening and at a Tish, he sits on a plain bench. He has no use for extravagant silver utensils or accoutrements.
His love for fellow Jews is unparalleled, spending many hours each day helping people from all around the world. He cares for each Jew irrespective of which group they may belong to. Whoever hasn’t experienced his love, cannot understand what I mean. Even when he talks to fifteen year old children he uses words of respect and speaks in the third person.
He is the only Rebbe, in my opinion, who has never allowed a word to cross his lips without careful forethought. He doesn’t unload on anyone. This is someone who trembles with a countenance revealing his genuine fear of Hashem. Each time he even makes the most “mundane” of brachos the trepidation in saying Hashem’s name is palpable . The Rebbe never sits during davening, even if that davening takes him 10 hours.
The Amshinover Rebbe is possessed with unique strength. There are innumerable stories and testimonies from people who will support what I have written above. To give you a feel, I’ll relate one.
A few years ago, on Rosh Hashana, after two entire days without sleep and being involved with intensive davening that included a 7 hours personal Shmone Esreh, the Rebbe proceeded to wish a “Git Yohr” for four hours as people passed in front of him. After aTish, just before T’kias Shofar, the Rebbe informed his Gabbay that he needed to leave for some sleep. Before he entered his room, the Rebbe requested that the Gabbay wake him in nine minutes. After nine minutes, as the Gabbay entered, the Rebbe immediately jumped up and re-entered the Beis Medrash as if he has enjoyed a complete sleep. The Rebbe had minimised his bodily needs.
In respect of the Rebbe’s knowledge of Torah, he was never “caught out” on any topic: Bavli, Yerushalmi, Shulchan Aruch, Poskim, Kabbala, Chassidus or Sheylos U’Tshuvos (many tried to catch him out, but were unsuccessful). Even to this day, the Rebbe maintains Chevrusos studying all these topics.
I could go on and on about the Rebbe’s greatness, but it would be unnecessary if one takes the above into their hearts with seriousness. Nobody seriously questions the Rebbe because he is a giant of giants who serves Hashem constantly, and surely won’t err in Halacha.
I will finish with one story, which admittedly I heard second-hand. That being said, “well known things don’t require proof”.
R’ Shlomo Zalman Auerbach ז’ל, loved and respected the Rebbe. Once, R’ ShlomoZalman was asked how it was possible that the Rebbe seemingly didn’t follow Halacha (on account of the Rebbe davening after the Zman). R’ Shlomo Zalman answered:
“The Mishna in Pirkei Avos says that one Mitzvah causes another Mitzvah and an Aveirah causes another Aveirah. There are two ways of understanding this double meaning. When a man does a good deed, but isn’t sure whether what he did was indeed a good deed, look and see if the Yetzer Hora stirs the man or whether the Yetzer Hora is sidelined and leaves him alone. The obvious way to answer this is to look at the next action, after the Mitzvah. If the next action is good, then this is proof that the first action was also good.
When the Amshinover Rebbe does something which isn’t easily understood, we don’t know if he is doing Mitzvos or Aveyros ח’ו. Have a look at what his next actions are. They are Mitzvos … “
It’s important to note that the Rebbe studied for several years in Yeshivas Brisk. He grew up in an authentic “Litvak” home (his father was the Gaon R’ Chaim Milekovski). In all aspects of his life the Rebbe is a Machmir and punctilious, even more than the Briskers and the Chazon Ishnikes. This extends to all aspects of Kashrus, Pesach Chumros, Succos, Daled Minim, giving honour and respect to another human being, avoiding Machlokes, not speaking Lashon Hara etc. Do you know another Rebbe who has not had a single Machlokes with anyone?
The Rebbe is always on the go, rushing around with his eyes perched downwards. Everything the Rebbe does is with great care and Zrizus.
One more last story will serve to elucidate how much we don’t really know about him or appreciate his greatness.
A few years ago, on the Hillula of a previous Rebbe, his great-grandfather R’ Shimon Sholem ז’ל (Rabbi Shimon Sholem was a major driving force behind the exodus of thousands of young men in Mir, Kletzk, Radin, Novhardok, and other yeshivas via Japan to Shanghai at the outbreak of World War II and was also widely respected by the Rayatz of Chabad) on the 19th of Av,
the Rebbe went to R’ Shimon Sholem’s grave site in the old city of T’verya. On the way, he davens Shachris at the Kever of R’ Meir Ba’al HaNes. In that year, the Rebbe arrived very early at the Kever of R’ Meir Ba’al HaNes, and the Chassidim were sure that the Rebbe would manage to daven by the Zman. The Chassidim were astonished. The Rebbe paced around the Beis Medrash at the Kever of R’ Meir Ba’al HaNes deep in thought, occasionally glancing at the ticking clock. The Rebbe continued to pace back and forth, sweating profusely in the Tiberian heat. In the end, the Rebbe paced deep in thought for a full six hours, preparing himself for the eventual T’filla. What was the Rebbe thinking about? What was he waiting for? Everyone watched in astonishment. We will never know.
“The purpose of knowing, is that we will never know”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






