Thursday, October 27, 2016

Which Way Home

http://video.overdrive.com/watch?c=ofs&m=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%3D&s=90c22386faa92877fa0ccd3d61eb96709352ad7d

Which Way Home

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Which Way Home
Which Way Home.jpg
Directed byRebecca Cammisa
Produced byRebecca Cammisa
Music byJames Lavino
Cinematography
  • Lorenzo Hagerman
  • Eric Goethals
Edited by
  • Pax Wassermann
  • Madeleine Gavin
Production
company
Distributed byHBO Films
Release dates
  • January 31, 2009
Running time
90 minutes
CountryUnited States
Language
Which Way Home is a 2009 documentary film directed by Rebecca Cammisa. The film follows several children who are attempting to get from Mexico andCentral America to the United States, on top of a freight train that crossesMexico known as "La Bestia" (The Beast). Cammisa received a Fulbright Scholar Grant to make the documentary in 2006. The film premiered on HBOon August 24, 2009.

Sypnosis[edit]

Each year, thousands of Latin American migrants travel hundreds of miles to the United States, with many making their way on the tops of freight trains. Roughly five percent of those traveling alone are children. As the United States continues to debate immigration reform, the documentary Which Way Home looks the issue through the eyes of children who face the harrowing journey with enormous courage and resourcefulness.

Characters[edit]

  • Kevin: A fourteen-year-old boy trying to reach America to be able to support his mother back in Honduras. Eventually, Quickly finds out that life there is equally difficult in different ways.
  • Fito: A thirteen year old boy trying to find work in America. He leaves his hometown in Honduras with Kevin, also hoping to find a better life away from his grandmother and absent mother.
  • Yurico: A seventeen year old boy, who leaves Chiapas, Mexico in hopes of finding a family that will adopt him in the US. Having no family, he lives on the streets begging in Chiapas and strikes up a close friendship with Fito on the journey to the border. He struggles with an addiction to huffing glue.
  • SYNOPSIS

    As the United States continues to build a wall between itself and Mexico, Which Way Home shows the personal side of immigration through the eyes of children who face harrowing dangers with enormous courage and resourcefulness as they endeavor to make it to the United States.
    The film follows several unaccompanied child migrants as they journey through Mexico en route to the U.S. on a freight train they call "The Beast." Director Rebecca Cammisa(Sister Helen) tracks the stories of children like Olga and Freddy, nine-year-old Hondurans who are desperately trying to reach their families in Minnesota, and Jose, a ten-year-old El Salvadoran who has been abandoned by smugglers and ends up alone in a Mexican detention center, and focuses on Kevin, a canny, streetwise 14-year-old Honduran, whose mother hopes that he will reach New York City and send money back to his family. These are stories of hope and courage, disappointment and sorrow.
    They are the ones you never hear about – the invisible ones.
  • MEET THE CHILDREN

    Kevin, a canny, 14-year-old Honduran, who is traveling through Mexico to get to the United States. His reason: to find a job and send money back to his mother, Lupe. Kevin hopes to buy her a house so that she can leave an abusive relationship. Lupe hopes he will find work, or some U.S. citizen will adopt him. Kevin wants to go to Manhattan. But the trip he takes is a revelation to Kevin – he was prepared for the harshness of the journey, but the violence that he experiences and witnesses takes its toll. Unexpectedly, he reexamines the high cost migrants pay for their common dream of a better life in the United States.
    Fito, 13-year-old Honduran whose mother abandoned him when he was very young, lives with his impoverished grandmother, who has a job making cigars. He is traveling to the U.S. to look for work and hopes to be adopted.
    Yurico, a 17-year-old Mexican who ran away from his mother, has lived on the streets of Tapachula, Chiapas since age seven. Yurico proclaims that his life has been spent begging and sleeping on streets, thieving and abusing drugs; sometimes he makes money by washing buses at the city depot. Yurico wants a life free of drugs and violence, and is traveling to the U.S. to find a loving family.
    Jairo, a 14-year-old Mexican whose father never accepted him. He has lived on the streets of Chiapas since his mother was killed a year ago. Schooling is very important to him, but he cannot currently afford to continue his education. Jairo has decided to go to Laredo, Texas to find employment, and then return to Mexico with money to hire a tutor.
    Jose, a nine-year-old Salvadoran, lives with his aunt, and has not seen his mother Rosa since she left to work in the U.S. three years ago. Hoping to live with her, he traveled through Mexico on a bus with a smuggler. When Mexican immigration officials boarded the bus, the smuggler abandoned Jose, who was then taken to a detention center.
    Olga and Freddy, nine-year-old Hondurans being taken to the U.S. by smugglers, travel on Mexican freight trains. Olga is trying to get to her mother and sisters in Minnesota, while Freddy wants to reunite with his father. Both have witnessed many accidents while riding the trains, and hope that God will bless their journey.
    Juan Carlos, a 13-year-old Guatemalan, left a letter for his mother Esmeralda, stating that he was going to the U.S. to help her and his siblings. Juan Carlos' father abandoned the family years ago, so he feels it is his responsibility to provide for them. He also wants to find his father in New York, and confront him about why he's forgotten them.
    WHICH WAY HOME also features the families of two young migrants who did not survive their journey. The bodies of 13-year-old Eloy and his 16-year-old cousin Rosario were found separately in the desert. Their deaths, along with the other stories of those featured in the film, underscore the extremely dangerous journey undertaken by these often-invisible children, who are making adult decisions to change their lives.
  • ABOUT THE FILMMAKERS

    Rebecca Cammisa

    Director/Producer

    In 2003, Rebecca Cammisa founded Documentress Films, teamed up with Mr. Mudd Productions, and began developing the 2010 OSCAR®-nominated documentary, “Which Way Home,” for which she received a 2006 Fulbright Fellowship for Filmmaking.
    “Which Way Home” aired on HBO and was nominated for a 2010 Independent Spirit Award for Best Documentary, and received four EMMY nominations. The film won the 2010 News & Documentary Emmy Award for Outstanding Informational Programming and also received a 2010 Imagen Award for Best Documentary on Television.
    Ms. Cammisa co-directed, co-produced, and shot the feature documentary film, "Sister Helen," which aired on HBO, and won the Sundance Film Festival's 2002 Documentary Directing Award, was nominated for both a 2004 EMMY Award for Outstanding Cultural and Artistic Programming, and an Outstanding Directorial Achievement in Documentary Film Award by the Directors Guild of America. Rebecca has worked on various films and television series for IFC, A&E Films, and the History Channel.
    In 2010, Rebecca was honored with a John Simon Guggenheim Fellowship for Filmmaking, and the Robert F. Kennedy Journalism Awards Grand Prize. In 2012, Rebecca directed and produced the OSCAR®-nominated documentary short, "God is the Bigger Elvis."

 

REVIEWS

"Tremendous - eye opening filmmaking."
Erik Price, Esquire
"Tackles the almost unfathomably complex immigration issue by zooming in on some of its youngest victims."
David Hinckley, The New York Daily News
"Taps into the same concept and themes of Sin Nombre, except it's all real and it's all heartbreaking to watch...A truly captivating documentary, that doesn't carry an agenda...it brings you to the front lines of a war we know very little about and turns the audience member into an expert. But, like with most documentaries, what becomes of that new chunk of brutal information is entirely up to you. My advice: Turn to the person next to you and tell them there's a great film they need to see."
Erik Davis, Cinematical
"An unflinching look at the world of Central American child migrants."
The Wall Street Journal
"Dramatically and pictorially pulls its weight...a reverse-angle on the many documentaries about decamped mothers or fathers who toil in New York or Los Angeles to send cash back to families from whom they are exiled."
Ronnie Scheib, Variety
"Despite the subject matter -- terrified children, many who haven't seen their families in years -- Cammisa never gets sentimental, and instead lets those closest to the subject do the talking."
New York Magazine
"Without resorting to any background narration, Which Way Home raises questions about cross-border immigration policies and the macro-economic causes that propel people from struggling countries to stream into developed ones."
Reed Johnson, Los Angeles Times
"Some of them make it. Some of them don't. But all of them remind us what it truly means to be brave and literally chase after your dreams."
Latina Magazine
"Exceptionally effective filmmaking."
Jennifer Merin, About.com
"What comes out of the film is a message of hope, as there needs to be a serious discussion about immigration policy by both sides of the border. Having a situation where so many children are risking their lives to try and come here is pretty unacceptable. Thankfully, Which Way Home is a film that informs and inspires - as the first step in creating real change is to give people the knowledge of what is actually happening - and that is an incredibly hopeful thing."
Gina Telaroli, TakePart.com
"Produces a powerful testimony of how absolute poverty hurls even young children into the clandestine migrant stream. It is the best film made of the undocumented migration of Central Americans into the United States."
Nestor Rodriguez, Professor, Department of Sociology, The University of Texas at Austin, Author, When States Kill: Latin America, the U.S., and Technologies of Terror
"It's an amazing film. As someone who teaches immigration courses but also does research precisely on the issue of family separation and the migration of children, I have seen many films about how migrants reach the United States. But I've never seen anything like Which Way Home. It's easily the best documentary of its kind I've seen... The film does not dehumanize or essentialize these children. Rather, the humane and sensitive lens seems to aim to present a realistic picture that can inform many about the human drama that these young immigrants and their families live...But we don't only get to hear the children's stories in their own voices, we also learn their parents' views, and get a good glimpse of the context within which the kids live and within which they make decisions to migrate...A remarkably well done documentary that will inform many students of immigration and spark important debates."
Cecilia Menjivar, Professor of Sociology, School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Author, Fragmented Ties: Salvadoran Immigrant Networks in America
"Heartbreaking... These stories illustrate how U.S. immigration and border enforcement policies affect families thousands of miles away who have no recourse but to migrate without documents so as to find opportunities for work. This documentary is an invaluable educational tool for all ages."
Patricia Zavella, Professor and Chair, Latin American and Latino Studies, University of California-Santa Cruz, Author, Women and Migration in the US-Mexico Borderlands

FILM FESTIVALS

U.S. Film Festivals

  • Cine Las Americas Film Festival, Texas
  • Columbus International Film & Video Festival, Ohio
  • Los Angeles Film Festival, California
  • New York International Latino Film Festival
  • Napa Sonoma Wine Country Film Festival
  • North Carolina Latin American Film Festival
  • Rocky Mountain Women’s Film Festival, Denver
  • San Francisco Immigrant Film Festival, California
  • Sedona Film Festival, Arizona
  • Traverse City Film Festival, Michigan
  • Tribeca Film Festival, New York (World Festival Premiere)
  • United Nations Association Film Festival

International Film Festivals

  • Ambulante Film Festival, Xalapa, Veracruz, Mexico
  • Bermuda Docs International Film Festival
  • Ciclo de Cine Documental, Bilwi, Nicaragua
  • CineMigrante Film Festival, Buenos Aires, Argentina
  • CineMigrante Film Festival, Bogota, Colombia
  • CNEX Documentary Film Festival, Taipei, Taiwan
  • Documenta Madrid, Spain
  • Docaviv, Tel Aviv, Israel
  • Festival de Films sur les Droits de la Personne de Montréal, Canada
  • Global Visions Film Festival, Edmonton, Canada
  • Havana International Film Festival, Cuba
  • Hot Docs Film Festival, Toronto, Canada
  • Human Rights Film Festival, Sarajevo, Bosnia & Herzegovina
  • IDFA, Holland
  • International Film Festival & Forum on Human Rights, Geneva, Switzerland
  • International Human Rights Film Festival, Mexico City
  • Istanbul International Meeting of Cinema & History Film Festival, Turkey
  • Karlovy Vary Film Festival, Czech Republic
  • Kiev International Film Festival, Ukraine
  • Latin American Film Festival, Utrecht, Holland
  • Latin Beat Film Festival, Japan
  • Marda Loop Justice Film Festival, Calgary, Canada
  • Montreal Human Rights Film Festival, Canada
  • Morelia International Film Festival, Mexico
  • One World International Film Festival, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Open Doek Film Festival, Belgium
  • 1000 Metros Bajo Tierra Film Fest, Merida, Venezuela
  • Refuge in Films, London, U.K.
  • Reykyavik International Film Festival, Iceland
  • San Sebastian Human Rights Film Fest, Spain
  • Seoul International Youth Film Festival, South Korea
  • Thessaloniki Documentary Film Festival, Greece
  • 20th Africa, Asian & Latin American Film Fest, Milano, Italy
  • UNICEF ‘s Convention on Rights of the Child Film Festival, Amman, Jordan
  • WATCH DOCS/Human Rights in Film, Poland
  • Zacatecas Film Festival, Mexico
  • Week of New Minorities, Slovakia

THE MAKING OF THE FILM

How did you meet your interview subjects?
We met our subjects in many different ways’ mostly in immigration detention centers, by the railroad tracks, and other locations where migrants converged to travel north. We felt it was extremely important to find families of children who had died migrating in the Sonora Desert, to make two points: that children are in grave danger when they migrate through Mexico, and that this practice is an urgent child welfare issue.
What aspect of the children’s journey surprised/shocked you most? Were you surprised by their age, conditions, and circumstances?
After researching this story for so long, I was not surprised or shocked by the circumstances of child migrants’ lives. However, I was taken by their utter commitment to pursing their dreams of reaching the United States. I did hold my breath when watching our young subjects hopping the trains. Sometimes, they treated the train like a playground; jumping from boxcar to boxcar, jumping off the train to run alongside it, only to jump back on again – just for laughs. They really did not have a “healthy fear” of freight trains as a dangerous means of travel.
What kind of impact did your presence have on the journey?
We wanted our impact to be minimal. As observers, our job was to document their lives while traveling with them. However, since our subjects were children, we made it a point to remind them how dangerous the road ahead could be, and we offered to help connect them with migration officials if they wanted to go home.
The realm we were filming in was full of smugglers, gang members, and corrupt officials. As a crew, we were always mindful of how our child subjects could potentially be put in danger by the presence of our cameras and ourselves. On several occasions, we decided not to travel with children when threats towards us were made.
How long was the filming? Were there gaps in between shoots? How did you track your subjects?
This film took six years to complete, and there where many gaps in between shoots. I first pitched this film idea in early 2003, and received a development grant from the Sundance Documentary Fund. In November 2004, I traveled to Mexico to research, scout locations, film child subjects, and edit a trailer for fundraising purposes. While filming in 2004, I was struck by the huge multitudes of migrants that had crossed over from Guatemala into Tapachula, Mexico, and were waiting on the tracks to hop freight trains going north. This fact made it very easy for us to meet potential subjects. Unfortunately, the development money ran out and I was forced to return to Mexico City and cut a trailer with the footage I had.
Shortly after HBO came on board, I decided to search for an executive producer. That same year, Lianne Halfon, Russell Smith and John Malkovich of Mr. Mudd stepped in. Fortunately for us, Mr. Mudd agreed to executive produce, and while they worked tirelessly to find investors, filming was halted for a year and a half. Because of Mr. Mudd’s involvement, I was able to return to Mexico to complete principal filming. In 2006, investors were found, and I also received a Fulbright Fellowship to Mexico for Filmmaking. This 11-and-a-half-month fellowship began in the fall of 2006, and helped me greatly by providing: 1) a stipend that covered my living expenses, and 2) the most important factor – a work visa, which granted me the extended time in Mexico to complete filming.
Because there were many delays in filming, most of the time we would be forced to begin again with new child subjects. Also, after Hurricane Stan struck in 2005, the landscape in Tapachula, Mexico irrevocably changed. This hurricane destroyed infrastructure, train tracks, and wiped out the train bridge that trains took north. Therefore the trains stopped running and migrants were forced to find other dangerous routes to cross. Partial funding arrived in January 2007, but by the time we returned to film, it was much harder to connect with potential subjects. Our shooting schedule lasted three weeks when bureaucratic and contractual delays forced myself, and my crew to suspend filming and leave the field again.
Six months later, in July 2007, filming continued, and we had to find new child subjects. Also, the train company that operated in southern Mexico officially folded. We did not realize it at the time, but the train we took with our new child subjects was the last one that went north. Filming halted once again for three weeks, but we were able to follow up with our child subjects in mid-August through September, and again in November 2007.
Your crew has incredible access within the governmental agencies in Mexico. How were you able to get clearance?
Gaining access and permissions from governmental officials and various agencies took many months to obtain. I was very fortunate in meeting Alejandra Liceaga, the film’s production manager. She was instrumental in making those initial contacts, building support, and pursuing the permissions until we finally received them.
I must say that we received lots of support and good will from Central American and Mexican officials, who really believed in the story we were trying to tell, and so the accesses were granted.
What is your intended impact for the film?
To make the public aware of the realities of child migration, and to provide a greater understanding of not only how but also why children are so driven to make this journey alone. Many child migrants are trying to find relatives, so one challenge is how to provide laws that migrating children and their parents can be reunified safely. Lastly, and very hopefully, that this film will serve as a catalyst to promote a dialogue that leads to creating humane, immigration policy reform in the United States.


REVIEWS

"Tremendous - eye opening filmmaking."
Erik Price, Esquire
"Tackles the almost unfathomably complex immigration issue by zooming in on some of its youngest victims."
David Hinckley, The New York Daily News
"Taps into the same concept and themes of Sin Nombre, except it's all real and it's all heartbreaking to watch...A truly captivating documentary, that doesn't carry an agenda...it brings you to the front lines of a war we know very little about and turns the audience member into an expert. But, like with most documentaries, what becomes of that new chunk of brutal information is entirely up to you. My advice: Turn to the person next to you and tell them there's a great film they need to see."
Erik Davis, Cinematical
"An unflinching look at the world of Central American child migrants."
The Wall Street Journal
"Dramatically and pictorially pulls its weight...a reverse-angle on the many documentaries about decamped mothers or fathers who toil in New York or Los Angeles to send cash back to families from whom they are exiled."
Ronnie Scheib, Variety
"Despite the subject matter -- terrified children, many who haven't seen their families in years -- Cammisa never gets sentimental, and instead lets those closest to the subject do the talking."
New York Magazine
"Without resorting to any background narration, Which Way Home raises questions about cross-border immigration policies and the macro-economic causes that propel people from struggling countries to stream into developed ones."
Reed Johnson, Los Angeles Times
"Some of them make it. Some of them don't. But all of them remind us what it truly means to be brave and literally chase after your dreams."
Latina Magazine
"Exceptionally effective filmmaking."
Jennifer Merin, About.com
"What comes out of the film is a message of hope, as there needs to be a serious discussion about immigration policy by both sides of the border. Having a situation where so many children are risking their lives to try and come here is pretty unacceptable. Thankfully, Which Way Home is a film that informs and inspires - as the first step in creating real change is to give people the knowledge of what is actually happening - and that is an incredibly hopeful thing."
Gina Telaroli, TakePart.com
"Produces a powerful testimony of how absolute poverty hurls even young children into the clandestine migrant stream. It is the best film made of the undocumented migration of Central Americans into the United States."
Nestor Rodriguez, Professor, Department of Sociology, The University of Texas at Austin, Author, When States Kill: Latin America, the U.S., and Technologies of Terror
"It's an amazing film. As someone who teaches immigration courses but also does research precisely on the issue of family separation and the migration of children, I have seen many films about how migrants reach the United States. But I've never seen anything like Which Way Home. It's easily the best documentary of its kind I've seen... The film does not dehumanize or essentialize these children. Rather, the humane and sensitive lens seems to aim to present a realistic picture that can inform many about the human drama that these young immigrants and their families live...But we don't only get to hear the children's stories in their own voices, we also learn their parents' views, and get a good glimpse of the context within which the kids live and within which they make decisions to migrate...A remarkably well done documentary that will inform many students of immigration and spark important debates."
Cecilia Menjivar, Professor of Sociology, School of Social and Family Dynamics, Arizona State University, Author, Fragmented Ties: Salvadoran Immigrant Networks in America
"Heartbreaking... These stories illustrate how U.S. immigration and border enforcement policies affect families thousands of miles away who have no recourse but to migrate without documents so as to find opportunities for work. This documentary is an invaluable educational tool for all ages."
Patricia Zavella, Professor and Chair, Latin American and Latino Studies, University of California-Santa Cruz, Author, Women and Migration in the US-Mexico Borderlands
Which Way Home

Wednesday, October 26, 2016

The Holocaust’s long reach





The Holocaust’s long reach: Trauma is passed on to survivors’ children


On the morning of April 15, 1945, 70 years ago this month, a convoy of Canadian and British soldiers liberated Franci Solar, a 25-year-old Czechoslovakian dressmaker, from the Nazi concentration camp at Bergen-Belsen, in northern Germany. She had been living in camps, including Theresienstadt and Auschwitz, since 1942.


She was undernourished and puffy and had typhus. When she finally made her way back to Prague, weeks later, friends were surprised to find her alive, which was why they had sold or assumed possession of her belongings. The odds were in their favour. Of the nine million Jews who had lived in Europe before the war, and of the perhaps 500,000 who survived in Nazi-occupied Europe in concentration lager, or fighting in small bands of partisans, or hiding, or passing as Christians, no more than 75,000 outlived the camps.
Franci resumed a mostly solitary life in Prague – her parents and husband had been killed by the Nazis – until she married Kurt Epstein, a 41-year-old former Olympic water-polo player and fellow camp survivor, and in 1947 gave birth to their daughter, Helen – Helen, after Kurt’s mother, also killed. After the Soviet-backed Communist coup in Czechoslovakia in 1948, the Epsteins moved to Manhattan. About 92,000 Holocaust survivors emigrated to the United States. An additional 25,000 headed to Canada.
Thirty-one years later, Helen published a book. It was a story no one had ever told before, at least not in a book meant to be read by everyone.
Children of the Holocaust: Conversations with Sons and Daughters of Survivors – published to widespread acclaim in 1979, 35 years ago last fall – made a then-astounding claim: that the harrowing trauma of the Holocaust, and the symptoms that marked survivors, had been passed on to their children – a generation that wasn’t even alive during the war.
Today, having identified post-traumatic stress disorder, we take this as a given. And the transmission isn’t just psychological, as psychiatrists have pointed out for more than a century; it’s physical. Rachel Yehuda, a pioneering psychiatrist and neuroscientist at Mount Sinai School of Medicine in New York, has found that children of mothers with PTSD are three times as likely to have it as are other kids, and almost four times more likely to be depressed and anxious. As Judith Shulevitz pointed out last fall in The New Republic, the children of survivors often have unusual levels of cortisol, a hormone released in response to stress – which was also true of infants whose mothers were pregnant and near the World Trade Center on 9/11.
Emotional and physical trauma can become genetic.
I reread Helen Epstein’s book a few days ago, as we came up on Easter and Passover, the annual celebrations of forgiveness and freedom and resurrection and renewal that take place this weekend. Reading it, you can’t help but think of all the agony that has been stored up and passed on – by survivors not just of the Holocaust, but of Hiroshima and of Cambodia and of Rwanda, of residential schools and wars and countless other public and private calamities.
But the more we learn about how deep and far a wound can travel, the more we seem to want to forget it. The world is plagued by genocide (Islamic State, Boko Haram), ethnic wars (Ukraine, Mali, Burma), physical, sexual and racial abuse (disappearing aboriginal women, men’s fraternities in Oklahoma). It made me want to remember what Helen Epstein noticed 35 years ago, and how the world responded. Because 35 years from now, another generation’s scars will be rippling to the surface.
Helen Epstein was a student at Israel’s Hebrew University in the late 1960s (she’s 67 now) when she first felt a connection to other children of Holocaust survivors – multilingual citizens of a global array of countries whose parents were all Central European survivors of concentration camps.
“I wasn’t even thinking about trauma then,” Ms. Epstein remembers. “I was just thinking, ‘Here are all these people who speak European languages like me.’ And I was connecting with them.” Never before – not at school in New York, not playing music (she is a widely published cultural journalist and biographer of, among others, Vladimir Horowitz and producer Joe Papp), not in the Brownie Scouts – had she ever felt part of a community.
Her sense of isolation was itself a symptom. Until then, the Holocaust had been what Helen believed was her private secret, a “black box” within her where she stored the details of her parents’ life in the camps, and her own vivid, almost hallucinogenic mental images: piles of skeletons and hills of suitcases, barbed wire – none of which she had seen with her own eyes. She lived within a “floating sense of danger and incipient harm.” Manhattan’s Seventh Avenue subway line was a cattle car on the way to Poland. A smokestack was always attached to an imagined crematorium. She often felt angry and violent, but had nowhere to park those feelings.
In hundreds of interviews over the next decade, including a two-year stint of research in Toronto, she discovered how common and debilitating these fears were. They recurred again and again in the lives of children of survivors.
The parents of one of her closest friends never left their house, for fear it would be looted or burnt down: This seemed like a reasonable concern to Ms. Epstein. Many children of survivors married other children of survivors: Raising a family took on “cosmic significance.” Some hid their Jewishness; many never talked of the war, “because talk meant accepting that the war had happened and, more than anything else in the world, I wished it had not,” as one subject explained. Many were named for murdered relatives. Many were enormously accomplished people, but they still felt like replacements, with all the burden that implied. Hardly anyone discussed these matters.
Most of all, they had to deal with their parents, who had survived unthinkable Nazi torture to give their children a life free from it. “For most kids of survivors, there’s nothing except your parents,” Ms. Epstein told me recently from Lexington, Mass., where she writes and lives with her husband, Patrick Mehr, an e-book publisher and himself the son of French survivors, “There’s no grandparents. No aunts or cousins. What does that mean? It means, first of all, that your parents have no context. There’s no one to say, ‘No, your mother didn’t do that, your father’s wrong.’ It essentially magnifies the power of the parents.”
Quite apart from hearing harrowing stories of murdered relatives – proof, as Ms. Epstein says, “that something went really wrong in your family”– the children of survivors had no allies. The ensuing pressure to cause no trouble, to outperform others, to make up for all the losses of the war, was overwhelming. Some had trouble settling on a career; many figured any choice would fail; many were anxious. “I often wonder if I could have survived myself and I doubt whether I could have,” one interviewee tells the author. Says another: “We had to be gentle with our parents. They appeared to be very strong people but we had to be gentle with them because they could shatter very easily.”
Every time Albert Singerman, one of Ms. Epstein’s subjects, disobeyed his mother, she screamed “Enemy of Israel! Enemy of the Jews!” He responded by trying to see how long he could hold his breath in shower stalls, and later enlisted and fought in Vietnam.
Ms. Epstein herself often felt numb, as if she had no right to be angry. Her solution was to dissociate from what was happening. She longed to hear her family’s stories, but she was loath to cause her parents any pain in the telling. Everything took place under a curtain of secrecy – and in a mixture of Czech and German, to boot. “I heard all this in a language that wasn’t my adult language”– loaded words like lager andkapo and achtung, which didn’t seem to have any precise English equivalent. “It made it feel like a different world,” Ms. Epstein says today. “And maybe that speaks to why no one knew. It was like another planet.”
Thirty years went by before these problems were identified in the children of survivors. Ms. Epstein estimated there were at least 250,000 children of survivors like her. Today, there are, conservatively speaking, somewhere between 10 million and 52 million refugees on Earth, people who have been ripped out of their lives and families for the crime of being who they are. Presumably their offspring will have a few issues themselves.
For all the corroboration Ms. Epstein found, there was very little acknowledgment of the syndrome scientifically. By 1978, fewer than two dozen studies of children of survivors had been published. The first, a casual description of three patients, was written in 1966 by Vivian Rakoff, the brilliant professor emeritus of psychiatry at the University of Toronto (and later director of what became the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health), who at the time was an assistant director of research at the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal, another gathering city for survivors.
“The parents are not broken conspicuously,” Rakoff wrote, “yet their children, all of whom were born after the Holocaust, display severe psychiatric symptomatology. It would almost be easier to believe that they, rather than their parents, had suffered the corrupting, searing hell.” Two of his three subjects had tried to commit suicide.
Twelve years later, Rakoff and two colleagues published the first systematic study of children of survivors. He was violently criticized for pathologizing them, and while he now points out that “the vast majority of the kids of survivors do okay,” he sees nothing surprising in his original thesis. “It’s not surprising that a tremendously traumatic event would be imparted to successive generations. Human beings are shaped by experience. And experience becomes part of memory. And memory is what we impart to our children.” (Dr. Yehuda’s theory, that stress reactions caused by severe trauma are genetically inheritable, has run into skepticism as well.)
That changed as Helen Epstein’s book appeared, first in the form of a New York Times Magazine story. Some survivors hated it. “It really upset Holocaust survivors who were invested in normal children, and in not giving Hitler a posthumous victory.” But the 500 letters that arrived in response – detailed seven- and eight-page single-spaced accounts of similar experiences – proved her hunch had been right.
Children of the Holocaust has been in print ever since. Germany, Italy and Japan, three countries of the Axis, were the first to translate it outside the United States. It still hasn’t been published in Israel.
“Israel has always been extremely ambivalent about the Holocaust,” Ms. Epstein said, over the telephone. “In 1967, when I was starting my inquiry, Israel was 19 years old, exactly as old as I was. So it was a very new country, and they were really trying to differentiate between Israelis and Diaspora Jews.” Israel was trying to re-establish a stronger, healthier, prouder, fitter image of Jewishness.
As well, Ms. Epstein added, “Everyone in Israel is some kind of survivor,” whether of 19th-century pogroms in Russia or of more recent Jewish exoduses from North Africa and the Middle East. “So you have a country that’s totally populated with people who have PTSD. Why would they be more interested in my parents’ history than they would be in their own? Plus, my family’s story doesn’t fit the Zionist narrative, because my parents emigrated to America.”
These days, with her husband, she runs Plunkett Lake Press, a non-fiction publishing company with a focus on Jewish writing (including Heda Kovaly’s Under A Cruel Star, one of the most gripping Holocaust memoirs ever published, which Ms. Epstein discovered and translated.) Plunkett Lake was the spot in the Berkshires where Kurt Epstein liked to swim after he came to America.
Ms. Epstein has two grown sons. They grew up with relatives, so “they’re not as preoccupied by history.” The transmission of historical trauma from generation to generation can be halted, it seems, provided one works to becomes conscious of it.
But history keeps grasping for us anyway. Ms. Epstein is now finishing the last in what has turned out to be a trilogy of memoirs about the long and often invisible hand of the Holocaust in her life: All she will say is that it uncovers sexual abuse, an affair her mother had, and our astonishing ability to “forget” what we most need to remember.
Trauma is trauma, whether it is besetting children of Holocaust survivors or children of families shattered by atom bombs, civil war, terrorism, domestic violence, sexual abuse, addiction, or even illness and disability. The stories keep emerging: in Heather Connell’s Small Voices, a film about the children of survivors of the Khmer Rouge killing fields; in Peter Balakian’s memoir Black Dog of Fate, written as the son of survivors of the Armenian genocide; in Michael Arlen’s Passage to Ararat, also about Armenia. (Memoirs by the children of Rwandan survivors are rarer: They’re just becoming adults.) The details of each oppression make it unique, but the effect of the trauma always follows the same path.
“I don’t feel possessive about my PTSD at all,” Ms. Epstein says. “I think it’s nearly universal.” To which Vivian Rakoff adds, “I think the transmission of trauma has to be admitted to. That when you do something terrible, it has effects. You can have psychic transmission of disorder in the same way you can have microbial transmission of disorder.”
Now we are learning that the horror can be passed along physically, and perhaps even genetically. Efforts are being made to interrupt that fateful flow: At Mount Sinai in New York, Dr. Yehuda has a theory that hydrocortisone might stymie the establishment of PTSD. There are also encouraging therapies and experimental programs, as Judith Shulevitz reported in The Atlantic, in which pregnant women at risk for PTSD receive counselling to help them through the thickets of child rearing.
Trauma and the atrocities that cause it are unavoidable. Parliament’s decision to expand Canada’s war against the Islamic State is, at least arguably, a legitimate and necessary evil. But the children of the soldiers and victims who fall on both sides in that war will feel its trauma regardless, in some place too dark to see. Then will come the hard part. Because once we notice trauma, and inquire after it, we are apologizing for it, and admitting to some sense of responsibility.
Maybe this is why we try so hard not to to notice other people’s pain, why we resist the idea that formative experiences are passed along in physical form as memory, conscious or collective or otherwise. We know we’re connected to one another in ways we can’t see or control, inconvenient as the fact often is. “Much of history is written in blood,” Helen Epstein writes in Children of the Holocaust, “and experiencing some degree of trauma seems to be a part of experiencing life. What that means to me is that it is not ‘other’ but, to various degrees, ‘us’ and that we need to learn to use that insight toward connection rather than separation.” Human pain turns out to be not very private after all.
Judith Herman, the Harvard psychiatrist who in 1993 wrote Trauma and Recovery: The Aftermath of Violence from Domestic Abuse to Political Terror, observed that “the study of psychological trauma has a curious history – one of episodic amnesia.” Why? Because “to study psychological trauma is to come face to face both with human vulnerability in the natural world and with the capacity for evil in human nature.”
We want to remember, and we want to forget. We are who we are. But sometimes we can’t bear to admit it.

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

The Second World War: The Grand Alliance (Unabridged) Part 1




The Second World War: The Grand Alliance (Unabridged) Part 1

The Death of the West: How Dying Populations and Immigrant Invasions Imperil Our Country and Civilization
THESE  SAME ENRICH OUR CIVILIZATION-WHO ELSE CONDEMNED IMMIGRANT INFLUX  FASCISTS AND THEIR PERNICIOUS NOTION OF LEBENSRAUM AND JUDENREIN
EY

Churchill, Hitler, and "The Unnecessary War": How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World

UNNECESSARY WAR? IT SAVED CIVILIZATION  from barbarism  EYMay 27, 2008

Were World Wars I and II inevitable? Were they necessary wars? Or were they products of calamitous failures of judgment?

In this monumental and provocative history, Patrick Buchanan makes the case that, if not for the blunders of British statesmen–Winston Churchill first among them–the horrors of two world wars and the Holocaust might have been avoided and the British Empire might never have collapsed into ruins. Half a century of murderous oppression of scores of millions under the iron boot of Communist tyranny might never have happened, and Europe’s central role in world affairs might have been sustained for many generations.

Among the British and Churchillian errors were:
• The secret decision of a tiny cabal in the inner Cabinet in 1906 to take Britain straight to war against Germany, should she invade France
• The vengeful Treaty of Versailles that mutilated Germany, leaving her bitter, betrayed, and receptive to the appeal of Adolf Hitler
• Britain’s capitulation, at Churchill’s urging, to American pressure to sever the Anglo-Japanese alliance, insulting and isolating Japan, pushing her onto the path of militarism and conquest
• The greatest mistake in British history: the unsolicited war guarantee to Poland of March 1939, ensuring the Second World War

Certain to create controversy and spirited argument, Churchill, Hitler, and “the Unnecessary War” is a grand and bold insight into the historic failures of judgment that ended centuries of European rule and guaranteed a future no one who lived in that vanished world could ever have envisioned
http://www.audible.com/pd/History/Never-Give-In-Audiobook/B00HQ14LTM/ref=a_pd_Histor_c4_1_6_i?ie=UTF8&pf_rd_r=02HH9ZRHCTR89FTZHHSJ&pf_rd_m=A2ZO8JX97D5MN9&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_i=detail-page&pf_rd_p=1814705522&pf_rd_s=center-4


Never Give In! Speech

Churchill  speeches
Author: Sir Winston Churchill
Date:
24-MAR-2008
Narrator:
Christian Rodska 

http://www.audible.com/wl/ref=a_wl_c1_r?sortType=createdate&sortOrder=dsc&totalAsinsPerPage=20&page=6

http://www.audible.com/search/ref=a_search_c7_5_srchNxt?searchNarrator=Christian+Rodska&searchPage=5
Provider:
BBC WW
Running Time:
4 h 53 min
Format 4

This volume of Churchill's history of the Second World War recounts the events of 1941 surrounding America's entry into the War, Hitler's march on Russia, and the alliance between Britain and America. "After the first forty days we were alone," writes Churchill. This edition is part two of Churchill's own abridgement of his original six-volume history of the Second World War. Please note: This book was originally published in six volumes: 1. The Gathering Storm 2. Their Finest Hour 3. The Grand Alliance 4. The Hinge of Fate 5. Closing the Ring 6. Triumph and Tragedy Churchill then condensed these into four volumes, which have since been released as one, rather hefty, publication. This is an unabridged recording of Churchill's condensed volume, broken up into four parts, as follows: 1. Milestone to Disaster 2. Alone 3. The Grand Alliance 4. Triumph and Tragedy





APOSTLES DOCTRINE? BY STEVE FINNELL


EY   note my commentS

__________________________



APOSTLES DOCTRINE? BY STEVE FINNELL


The three thousand converts on the Day of Pentecost continued in the apostles doctrine. [Acts 2:40-42 And with many other words he testified and exhorted them, saying, "Be saved from this perverse generation."41 Then those who gladly received his word were baptized; and that day about three thousand souls were added to them. 42 And they continued steadfastly in the apostles doctrine....] NKJV

The apostles doctrine came from the apostles.
________________________________________________ Who are not apostles? Scribes and Pharisees, Thomas Campbell, Mary Baker Eddy, Tony Campolo, Judaizers, John Calvin, Joseph Smith Jr., Gnostics, Pope FrActs 2:40-42ancis, Kenneth E. Hagin,
Rick Warren, Max Lucado, Bill Hybels, Paul Washer, Martin Luther, William Miller, Charles Taze Russel, Brigham Young, Jimmy Swaggart, Charles Stanley, Chuck Swindoll, Alexander Campbell, Joyce Meyer, Benny Hinn, John Piper, T.D. Jakes, Joel Osteen, Dietrich Bonhoeffer, Dwight L. Moody, and Billy Graham.
___________Is  Holy Spirit  limited? Can it inspire? It bloweth  where it listeth_. What did the Lord mean  BY THEIR FRUITS YOU WILL KNOW THEM  AND WHO IS NOT AGAINST ME IS FOR ME?___They overturned the then known world and still do and these followed their  lead ________Edward Y. ___________________________From whom did the apostles receive their doctrine? From God the Father through Jesus and the Holy Spirit.
 [John 14:26 "But the Helper, the Holy Spirit, whom the Father will send in My name, He will teach you all things, and bring to your remembrance all things that I said to you.](NKJV)

John 16:13 However, when He, the Spirit of truth, has come, He will guide you into all truth; for He will not speak on His own authority, but whatever He hears He will speak; and He will tell you things to come. (NKJV)

The apostles had all truth. There was, nor is there, new truth after the apostles died.

Galatians 1:11-12 But I make known to you, brethren, that the gospel which was preached   me is not according to man. 12 For I neither received it from man, nor was I taught it, but it came through the revelation of Jesus Christ. (NKJV)

The apostle Paul was taught by Jesus Christ.

John 12:49 "For I have not spoken on My own authority; but the Father who sent Me gave Me a command, what I should say and what I should speak. (NKJV)

 John 7:16 Jesus answered them and said, "My doctrine is not Mine, but His who sent Me. (NKJV)

The apostles doctrine came from God the Father through Jesus and the Holy Spirit. The apostles were guided into all truth. There is no new truth. New truth ended with the death of the last apostle.
____________________________________________There is hidden truth  Note ellipsis bible passages  EY
______________________________________________ The apostles doctrine is found in the Bible alone.
_____________________________________________
The Holy Spirit is not limited   EY
The question is, do men today continue in the apostles doctrine or do they follow man-made doctrine? 

Sunday, October 23, 2016

Twilight's Last Gleaming / FULL Movie (1977) Burt Lancaster

( Dwight D. Eisenhower ) “Every GUN that is Made! Every WARSHIP Launched! Every ROCKET! Fired signifies in the Final SENSE ? Is a (Thief ) from Those Who “Hunger and Are NOT Fed ! Those Who are COLD and are NOT Clothed. This World in Arms is NOT spending money Alone. It is Spending the Sweat of its Laborers, the Genius of its Scientists, the HOPE’s of its Children. This is Not a Way of Life at ALL in any true sense. Under the Clouds of WAR, it is Humanity Hanging on a CROSS of IRON ( Dwight D. Eisenhower )



Ex POW Vietnam Vet USAF general Takes over a Titan ICBM complex too expose the PENTAGONs Criminal Activity's which COST the Lives of 58,000 Americans Soldiers & Airmen as well as the Ten of MILLIONS of South East Asians who Where Murdered by the US/NATO Governments and threatens to provoke World War 3 unless the President reveals details of a secret meeting held just after the start of the Vietnam War 
We, the U.S. have lost over 158,000 American lives to the Vietnam war and that count is still rising. Approx 58,000 in Vietnam. 100,000 or more to suicide and most of those occurred after the men came home. This accurate accounting gives us persepective on the cost of current and future wars. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UAmr-...
Soured on America by his experiences as a POW in Vietnam, General Lawrence Dell (Burt Lancaster) hopes that his government will someday tell the truth about the Southeast Asian debacle, thereby allowing his country to embark upon a healing process. Regarded as a dangerous embarrassment by the higher-ups, Dell is framed on a manslaughter charge and sent to prison. Escaping with three hardened convicts , Dell takes over an SAC base, threatening to launch nine Titan missiles if his demands that top-secret Vietnam files be made public are not met. Thus, the fate of the world rests in the hands of the mentally unbalanced Dell, his former superior General MacKenzie (Richard Widmark), and U.S. president David Stevens (Charles Durning). For this picture, Edward Huebach and Ronald M. Cohen adapted Walter Wager's novel Viper Three.
Twilight's Last Gleaming is a 1977 film directed by Robert Aldrich, starring Burt Lancaster and Richard Widmark. 

The film was a West German/US co-production, shot mainly at the Bavaria studios.
Loosely based on a 1971 novel, Viper Three by Walter Wager.

A split screen technique is used at several points in the movie to give the audience insight into the simultaneously occurring strands of the storyline. The film's title, which functions on several levels, is taken from The Star-Spangled Banner, the national anthem of the United States of America:
O say, can you see, by the dawn's early light / what so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last gleaming.

Also Staring "Paul Edward Winfield" other movies he played in , (The Terminator ) ( Damnation Alley ) & ( Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan )

Well known for playing mail carrier Cliff Clavin on the sitcom Cheers ( John Ratzenberger ) Plays a role as a USAF Sgt. Kopecki ( Suit Case Nuclear Weapons Specialist or Special Atomic Demolition Munition (SADM) Specialist'

And the Unforgettable ( Burt Young ) who played in the movies ROCKY and CONVOY & Back To School .